Free Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 53, Number 5, November-December 2019
Page(s) 1729 - 1747
Published online 09 October 2019
  • S.R. Adrian-Taylor, K.A. Noels and K. Tischler, Conflict between international graduate students and faculty supervisors: toward effective conflict prevention and management strategies. J. Stud. Int. Edu. 11 (2007) 90–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K.L. Alexander, D.R. Entwisle and C.S. Horsey, From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociol. Edu. 70 (1997) 87–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.L. Brockman, A.A. Nunez and A. Basu, Effectiveness of a conflict resolution training program in changing graduate students style of managing conflict with their faculty advisors. Innovative Higher Edu. 35 (2010) 277–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T.R. Burns and A. Gomolińska, The theory of socially embedded games: the mathematics of social relationships, rule complexes, and action modalities. Qual. Quant. 34 (2000) 379–406. [Google Scholar]
  • T.R. Burns, A. Gomolinska and L.D. Meeker, The theory of socially embedded games: applications and extensions to open and closed games. Qual. Quant. 35 (2001) 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • W. Busch Judith and S. Candace Garrett, Mentoring in graduate schools of education: mentees’ perceptions. J. Exp. Edu. 59 (1991) 165–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.M. Carr and U.S. Karmarkarm, Competition in multiechelon assembly supply chains. Manage. Sci. 51 (2005) 45–59. [Google Scholar]
  • E.F. Cataldi and A. KewalRamani, High school dropout and completion rates in the United States: 2007 Compendium report. NCES 2009–064. National Center for Education Statistics (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • P. Chiste, Assessing the needs of graduate students at the University of Saskatchewan. Unpublished manuscript, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • A.M. Colman, Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behav. Brain Sci. 26 (2003) 139–153. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Correa, An economic analysis of class size and achievement in education. Edu. Econ. 1 (1993) 129–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Correa, A game theoretic analysis of teacher-student interaction, class size and achievement. Edu. Econ. 34 (1997) 13–38. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Correa, Game theory as an instrument for the analysis of international relations. Ritsumeikan Ann. Rev. Int. Stud. 14 (2001) 187–208. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Correa, A game theoretical analysis of the educational impact of differences in the abilities and work ethics of teachers and students. J. Socio-Econ. 32 (2003) 249–263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Correa and G.W. Gruver, Teacher–student interaction: a game theoretic extension of the economic theory of education. Math. Soc. Sci. 13 (1987) 19–47. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Damrosch, We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Devos, G. Boudrenghien, N. Van der Linden, M. Frenay, A. Azzi, B. Galand and O. Klein, Misfits between doctoral students and their supervisors:(how) are they regulated?. Int. J. Dr. Stud. 11 (2016) 467–486. [Google Scholar]
  • S.L. Dika and K. Singh, Applications of social capital in educational literature: a critical synthesis. Rev. Edu. Res. 72 (2002) 31–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Gao, L.I. Yuan and W. Zhang, A survey and analysis on the relationship between tutors and graduate students. Sci. Sci. Manage. S & T 28 (2007) 144–147. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Gillen, A.D. Ziegler, D.A. Friess and R. Wasson, Geography’s role in nurturing postgraduate students. Geog. J. 181 (2015) 427–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.M. Golde, Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Rev. Higher Edu. 23 (2000) 199–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Hamburger, Games as Models of Social Phenomena. Edited by W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • C.J. Hardy, Nurturing our future through effective mentoring: Developing roots as well as wings aaasp 1993 presidential address. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 6 (1994) 196–204. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Howells, K. Stafford, R. Guijt and M. Breadmorem, The role of gratitude in enhancing the relationship between doctoral research students and their supervisors. Teach. Higher Edu. 22 (2017) 621–638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hu, Cooperative partnership: a possible relationship for supervisors and postgraduates. Acad. Degr. Grad. Edu. 4 (2014) 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  • J.N. Hughes, T.A. Cavell and V. Willson, Further support for the developmental significance of the quality of the teacher–student relationship. J. School Psychol. 39 (2001) 289–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W.B. Johnson and J.M. Huwe, Toward a typology of mentorship dysfunction in graduate school. Psychotherapy: Theory Res. Pract. Train. 39 (2002) 44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W.B. Johnson and N. Nelson, Mentor-protégé relationships in graduate training: some ethical concerns. Ethics Behav. 9 (1999) 189–210. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Klomparens, J. Beck, J. Brockman and A. Nunez, Setting expectations and resolving conflicts in graduate education. J. Higher Edu. Strat. 2 (2004) 21–37. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Komarraju, S. Musulkin and G. Bhattacharya, Role of student–faculty interactions in developing college students’ academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement. J. Col. Student Dev. 51 (2010) 332–342. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K.E. Kram, Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. University Press of America, Lanham, MD (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • V.M. Lechuga, Faculty–graduate student mentoring relationships: mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Edu. 62 (2011) 757–771. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D.J. Levinson, The Seasons of a Man’s Life. Random House Digital Inc, Manhattan, NY (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • P. Liu, The research on the relationship between mentor and master student – a case study of Nanjing University. Master’s thesis, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • W. Liu, A study on the supervisor–graduate relationship in the supervisor-funding system. Master’s thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • E. Löfström and K. Pyhältö, Ethics in the supervisory relationship: supervisors’ and doctoral students’ dilemmas in the natural and behavioural sciences. Stud. Higher Edu. 42 (2017) 232–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Lumby and M. Morrison, Partnership, conflict and gaming. J. Edu. Policy 21 (2006) 323–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Maher, B.C. Timmerman, D.F. Feldon and D. Strickland, Factors affecting the occurrence of faculty–doctoral student coauthorship. J. Higher Edu. 84 (2013) 121–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Mandel, Exploring the differences in expectations between supervisors and supervisees during the initial clinical experience. Perspect. Admin. Supervision 25 (2015) 4–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Midgley, H. Feldlaufer and J.S. Eccles, Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Dev. 60 (1989) 981–992. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Mohebbi and X. Li, Coalitional game theory approach to modeling suppliers’ collaboration in supply networks. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 169 (2015) 333–342. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Nerad and D.S. Miller, Increasing student retention in graduate and professional programs. New Directions Inst. Res. 92 (1996) 61–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G. Owen, Game Theory. 2nd edition. Academic Press, New York, NY (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • R.M. Ryan, J.D. Stiller and J.H. Lynch, Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. J. Early Adolescence 14 (1994) 226–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Spencer, “it’s not what I expected’’ a qualitative study of youth mentoring relationship failures. J. Adolescent Res. 22 (2007) 331–354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Talebpour, H.S. Mahmassani and S.H. Hamdar, Modeling lane-changing behavior in a connected environment: a game theory approach. Transp. Res. Proced. 7 (2015) 420–440. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H.R. Tenenbaum, F.J. Crosby and M.D. Gliner, Mentoring relationships in graduate school. J. Vocational Behav. 59 (2001) 326–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Tsay and N. Agrawal, Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 2 (2000) 372–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (60th anniversary, commemorative edition). Princeton University Press. Princeton Google Scholar, Princeton, NJ (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K.R. Wentzel, Sociometric status and adjustment in middle school: a longitudinal study. J. Early Adolescence 23 (2003) 5–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Xu, C. Ye and T. Ling, An analysis for relationship between supervisors and graduate students. Acad. Degr. Grad. Edu. 2 (2000) 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Ye and J. Zhang, Innovative research on graduate education quality. In: Engineering Education and Management. Springer, Berlin (2012) 457–460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhang, The research on harmonious relationship between the supervisors and the postgraduates. China Higher Edu. Res. 9 (2007) 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhang, Q. Gou, J. Zhang and L. Liang, Supply chain pricing decisions with price reduction during the selling season. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52 (2014) 165–187. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Zhu, A review on the research of the supervisor–postgraduate relationship. Acad. Degr. Grad. Edu. 11 (2011) 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  • A.D. Ziegler and J. Gillen, De-mythologizing the faculty–postgraduate writing experience in geography. Geoforum 59 (2015) 129–132. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.