Free Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 54, Number 2, March-April 2020
Page(s) 451 - 469
Published online 27 February 2020
  • Artelys, Knitro nonlinear optimization solver. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • J.R. Banga, Optimization in computational systems biology. BMC Syst. Biol. 2 (2008) 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  • R.H. Byrd, J. Nocedal and R.A. Waltz, Knitro: an integrated package for nonlinear optimization. In: Large-scale Nonlinear Optimization. Springer (2006) 35–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.A.C. Coello, Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 (2002) 1245–1287. [Google Scholar]
  • A.R. Conn, G. Gould and P.L. Toint, In: 17 of LANCELOT: A Fortran Package for Large-scale Nonlinear Optimization (Release A). Springer Science & Business Media (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • A.V. Fiacco and G.P. McCormick, Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1968). [Google Scholar]
  • GAMS World site. Cute models section. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • W.L. Goffe, G.D. Ferrier and J. Rogers, Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing. J. Econ. 60 (1994) 65–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.D. Griffin and T. Kolda, Nonlinearly constrained optimization using heuristic penalty methods and asynchronous parallel generating set search. Appl. Math. Res. Express 2010 (2010) 36–62. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Hald and K. Madsen, Combined lp and quasi-newton methods for minimax optimization. Math. Program. 20 (1981) 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Hansen. A Python implementation of CMA-ES. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • N. Hansen and S. Kern, Evaluating the CMA evolution strategy on multimodal test functions. Springer (2004) 282–291. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE (1996) 312–317. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Hansen, S.D. Müller and P. Koumoutsakos, Reducing the time complexity of the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMA-ES). Evol. Comput. 11 (2003) 1–18. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Homaifar, C.X. Qi and S.H. Lai, Constrained optimization via genetic algorithms. Simulation 62 (1994) 242–253. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Kaucic, A multi-start opposition-based particle swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive velocity for bound constrained global optimization. J. Global Optim. 55 (2013) 165–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Pso optimization. In: Vol. 4 of Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ (1995) 1941–1948. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gelatt and M.P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220 (1983) 671–680. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Lee, Particle swarm optimization (PSO) with constraint support. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • K.S. Lee and Z.W. Geem, A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 (2005) 3902–3933. [Google Scholar]
  • D.G. Luenberger, Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA (1984). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Luke, Essentials of Metaheuristics, 2nd edition. Lulu. Available for free at (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • M.E.-B. Menai, M. Batouche, Efficient initial solution to extremal optimization algorithm for weighted maxsat problem. In: International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems. Springer (2003) 592–603. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Michalewicz, Genetic algorithms for numerical optimization. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1 (1994) 223–240. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Michalewicz and C.Z. Janikow, Genetic algorithms for numerical optimization. Stat. Comput. 1 (1991) 75–91. [Google Scholar]
  • K.E. Parsopoulos and M.N. Vrahatis, Particle swarm optimization method for constrained optimization problems. Int. Technol.–Theory App.: New Trends Intell. Technol. 76 (2002) 214–220. [Google Scholar]
  • D.R. Penas, P. González, J.A. Egea, J.R. Banga and R. Doallo, Parallel metaheuristics in computational biology: an asynchronous cooperative enhanced scatter search method. Proc. Comput. Sci. 51 (2015) 630–639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D.R. Penas, D. Henriques, P. González, R. Doallo, J. Saez-Rodriguez and J.R. Banga, A parallel metaheuristic for large mixed-integer nonlinear dynamic optimization problems, with applications in computational biology. PLoS One 12 (2017) 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Poli, J. Kennedy and T. Blackwell, Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intell. 1 (2007) 33–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Powell, A tolerant algorithm for linearly constrained optimization calculations. Math. Program. 45 (1989) 547–566. [Google Scholar]
  • R.L. Rardin and R. Uzsoy, Experimental evaluation of heuristic optimization algorithms: a tutorial. J. Heuristics 7 (2001) 261–304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Rieck, M. Richter, M. Bittner and F. Holzapfel, Generation of initial guesses for optimal control problems with mixed integer dependent constraints. In: ICAS 29th International Conference (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • J. Robert, Vanderbei website. University of Princeton. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • B. Suman and P. Kumar, A survey of simulated annealing as a tool for single and multiobjective optimization. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57 (2006) 1143–1160. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Takahashi, Metaheuristic Algorithms Python. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • E. Talbi, Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation, 1st edition. Wiley (2009). ISBN 9780470278581. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Ugray, L. Lasdon, J. Plummer, F. Glover, J. Kelly and R. Mart, Scatter search and local NLP solvers: a multistart framework for global optimization. INFORMS J. Comput. 19 (2007) 328–340. [Google Scholar]
  • University of Magdeburg, The best known packings of equal circles in a square. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • Ö. Yeniay, Penalty function methods for constrained optimization with genetic algorithms. Math. Comput. App. 10 (2005) 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Zhang, A.C. Reynolds and D.S. Oliver, An initial guess for the levenberg–marquardt algorithm for conditioning a stochastic channel to pressure data. Math. Geol. 35 (2003) 67–88. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.