Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 54, Number 4, July-August 2020
Page(s) 1215 - 1230
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2019052
Published online 12 June 2020
  • J. Alcaraz, N. Ramón and J.L. Ruiz, I. Sirvent, Ranking ranges in cross efficiency evaluations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226 (2013) 516–521. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Contreras, Optimizing the rank position of the DMU as secondary goal in DEA cross-evaluation. Appl. Math. Model. 36 (2012) 2642–2648. [Google Scholar]
  • W.W. Daniel, Applied Nonparametric Statistics, Boston, Houghton Mifflin (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • J.R. Doyle and R.H. Green, Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45 (1994) 567–578. [Google Scholar]
  • J.R. Doyle, R.H. Green, Cross-Evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUs, INFOR: Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 33 (1995) 205–222. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Emrouznejad and G.L. Yang, A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sci. 61 (2018) 4–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Essid, J. Ganouati and S. Vigeant, A mean-maverick game cross-efficiency approach to portfolio selection: an application to Paris stock exchange. Expert Syst. Appl. 113 (2018) 161–185. [Google Scholar]
  • R.H. Green, J.R. Doyle, W.D. Cook, Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 90 (1996) 461–472. [Google Scholar]
  • G.R. Jahanshahloo, F.H. Lofti, Y. Yafari, R. Maddahi, Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross efficiency evaluation. Appl. Math. Model. 35 (2011) 544–549. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Khodabakhsh and K. Aryavas, Ranking all units in data envelopment analysis. Appl. Math. Lett. 25 (2012) 2066–2070. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Khodabakhsh and K. Aryavas, The cross efficiency in the optimistic– pessimistic framework. Oper. Res. 17 (2017) 619–632. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Li, Q. Zhu, Z. Chenc and H. Xue, A balanced data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 106 (2018) 154–168. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Li, Q. Zhu and L. Liang, Allocating a fixed cost based on a DEA- game cross efficiency approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 96 (2018) 196–207. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Liang, J. Wu, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113 (2008a) 1025–1030. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Liang, J. Wu, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, The DEA game cross-efficiency mode and its Nash equilibrium. Oper. Res. 56 (2008b) 1278–1288. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Lim, Minimax and maximin formulations of cross efficiency in DEA. Comput. Ind. Eng. 62 (2012) 726–731. [Google Scholar]
  • W. Liu, Y.M. Wang and S. Lv, An aggressive game cross efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 259 (2017) 241–258. [Google Scholar]
  • S.T. Liu, A DEA ranking method based on cross efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio. Ann. Oper. Res. 261 (2018) 207–232. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Oral, O. Kettani and P. Lang, A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Manage. Sci. 37 (1991) 871–885. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Oukil and G.R. Amin, Maximum appreciative cross efficiency in DEA: a new ranking method. Comput. Ind. Eng. 81 (2015) 14–21. [Google Scholar]
  • H.H. Örkcü and H. Bal, Goal programming approaches for data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation. Appl. Math. Comput. 218 (2011) 346–356. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Ramón, J.L. Ruiz and I. Sirvent, On the choice of weights profiles in cross efficiency evaluations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207 (2010) 1564–1572. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Ramón, J.L. Ruiz and I. Sirvent, Reducing differences between profiles of weights: a ``peer-restricted’’ cross efficiency evaluation. Omega 39 (2011) 634–641. [Google Scholar]
  • J.L. Ruiz, Cross efficiency evaluation with directional distance functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228 (2013) 181–189. [Google Scholar]
  • T.R. Sexton, R.H. Silkman and A.J. Hogan, Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. New Directions Eval. 32 (1986) 73–105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Sun, H. Huang and C. Zhou, DEA game cross-efficiency model to urban public infrastructure investment comprehensive efficiency of China. Math. Prob. Eng. (2016) 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.M. Wang and K.S. Chin, Some alternative models for DEA cross efficiency evaluation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 128 (2010a) 332–338. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.M. Wang and K.S. Chin, A neutral DEA model for cross efficiency evaluation and its extension. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010b) 3666–3675. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.M. Wang and K.S. Chin, The use of OWA operator weights for cross efficiency aggregation. Omega 39 (2011) 493–503. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.M. Wang, K.S. Chin and P. Jiang, Weight determination in the cross efficiency evaluation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 61 (2011a) 497–502. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.M. Wang, K.S. Chin and Y. Luo, Cross efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision-making units. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011b) 10312–10319. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Wu, L. Liang and F. Yang, Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game. Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2009a) 872–876. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Wu, L. Liang, Y. Zha and F. Yang, Determination of cross efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross-evaluation. Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2009b) 4826–4829. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Wu, J. Sun, L. Liang and Y. Zha, Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 5162–5165. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Wu, J.S. Sun and L. Liang, Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model. Comput. Ind. Eng. 63 (2012) 513–519. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Wu, J. Chu, J. Sun, Q. Zhu and L. Liang, Extended secondary goal models for weights selection in DEA cross efficiency evaluation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 93 (2016) 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  • B.C. Xie, J. Gaoa, S. Zhanga, R.Z. Pang and Z.X. Zhang, The environmental efficiency analysis of China’s power generation sector based on game cross-efficiency approach. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 46 (2018) 126–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G.L. Yang and A. Emrouznejad, Modelling efficient and anti-efficient frontiers in DEA without explicit inputs. Int. J. Oper. Res. 35 (2019) 505–528. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Zhang, Estimating Malmquist indices and semi-parametric censored regressions with a coherent data-generating process. IMA J. Manage. Math. 26 (2015) 63–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.