Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 54, Number 4, July-August 2020
Page(s) 1133 - 1160
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2019053
Published online 12 June 2020
  • Antigua Observer Newspaper, Samsung says phone explosions in China not caused by batteries. https://antiguaobserver.com/samsung-says-phone-explosions-in-china-not-caused-by-batteries/, Sep 19 (Accessed on Sep 20, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • E. Bolandifar, P. Kouvelis and F. Zhang, Delegation vs. control in supply chain procurement under competition. Prod. Oper. Manage. 25 (2016) 1528–1541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G.J. Burke, J.E. Carrillo and A.J. Vakharia, Single versus multiple supplier sourcing strategies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182 (2007) 95–112. [Google Scholar]
  • G.J. Burke, J.E. Carrillo and A.J. Vakharia, Sourcing decisions with stochastic supplier reliability and stochastic demand. Prod. Oper. Manage. 18 (2009) 475–484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G.P. Cachon and P.T. Harker, Competition and outsourcing with scale economies. Manage. Sci. 48 (2002) 1314–1333. [Google Scholar]
  • G.H. Chao, S.M.R. Iravani and R.C. Savaskan, Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts. Manage. Sci. 55 (2009) 1122–1138. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.J. Chen and Y. Chen, Strategic outsourcing under technology spillovers. Naval Res. Logist. (NRL) 61 (2014) 501–514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chen and Z. Guo, Strategic sourcing in the presence of uncertain supply and retail competition. Prod. Oper. Manage. 23 (2014) 1748–1760. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.J. Chen, S. Shum and W. Xiao, Should an OEM retain component procurement when the CM produces competing products?. Prod. Oper. Manage. 21 (2012) 907–922. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • V. Choudhary, A. Ghose, T. Mukhopadhyay and U. Rajan, Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Manage. Sci. 51 (2005) 1120–1130. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Dong, W. Tang and C. Zhou, Strategic procurement outsourcing with asymmetric cost information under scale economies. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 69 (2018) 1751–1772. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Dong, W. Tang and C. Zhou, Managerial flexibility strategies under supply and demand risks: Quantity postponement vs. price postponement. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. (2018) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Dong, K. Xu, Y. Xu and X. Wan, Quality management in multi-Level supply chains with outsourced manufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manage. 25 (2016) 290–305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. El Ouardighi, Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: a two-stage game approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 156 (2014) 260–268. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Eric, Apple Pressing LG to Add OLED Display Production for 2018 iPhone, Limiting Samsung’s Leverage. Available at: https://www.macrumors.com/2017/07/30/kuo-lg-gis-oled-2018-iphone/ (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • S.M. Gilbert, Y. Xia and G. Yu, Strategic outsourcing for competing OEMs that face cost reduction opportunities. IEEE Trans. 38 (2006) 903–915. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.H. Glock, Single sourcing versus dual sourcing under conditions of learning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 62 (2012) 318–328. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Gray and S. Handley, Managing quality in outsourced production: Construct development and measurement validation. Qual. Manage. J. 18 (2011) 26–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. He, H. Huang and K. Yuan, The comparison of two procurement strategies in the presence of supply disruption. Comput. Ind. Eng. 85 (2015) 296–305. [Google Scholar]
  • H.S. Heese, Single versus multiple sourcing and the evolution of bargaining positions. Omega-Int. J. Manage. Sci. 54 (2015) 125–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Huang and T. Xie, Reliability improvement and production decision under Cournot competition. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53 (2015) 4754–4768. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Huang, N. Zeng and H. Xu, Procurement mechanism for dual sourcing and emergency production under capacity constraint. Comput. Ind. Eng. 119 (2018) 204–218. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Jain and J. Hazra, Dual sourcing under suppliers’ capacity investments. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183 (2017) 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Kayis, F. Erhun and E.L. Plambeck, Delegation vs. control of component procurement under asymmetric cost information and simple contracts. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 15 (2013) 45–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Kumar, P. Basu and B. Avittathur, Pricing and sourcing strategies for competing retailers in supply chains under disruption risk, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 265 (2018) 533–543. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Lee, C. Li, Sourcing for Quality: Pricing, Inspection and Collaboration. Working paper. School of Business, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • X. Li and Y. Li, Optimal service contract under cost information symmetry/asymmetry. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 67 (2016) 269–279. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Li, Y. Li, X. Cai and J. Shan, Service channel choice for supply chain: Who is better off by undertaking the service? Prod. Oper. Manage. 25 (2016) 516–534. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.T. Lin and Y.J. Chen, Competitive outsourcing: Choosing between value-added services and key component supplying capability. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53 (2015) 3635–3650. [Google Scholar]
  • A.K. Mishra and P.R. Tadikamalla, Order splitting in single sourcing with scheduled-release orders. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57 (2006) 177–189. [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Mukhopadhyay and P. Kouvelis, A differential game theoretic model for duopolistic competition on design quality. RAIRO:OR 45 (1997) 886–893. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Niu, J. Li, J. Zhang, H. Cheng and Y. Tan, Strategic analysis of dual sourcing and dual channel with an unreliable alternative supplier. Prod. Oper. Manage. 28 (2019) 570–587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • SamMobile, Batteries from Samsung SDI won’t be used in the Galaxy Note 7 temporarily. Available at: https://www.sammobile.com/2016/09/05/batteries-from-samsung-sdi-wont-be-used-in-the-galaxy-note-7-temporarily/ (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • L. Silbermayr and S. Minner, Dual sourcing under disruption risk and cost improvement through learning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250 (2016) 226–238. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Tagaras and H.L. Lee, Economic models for vendor evaluation with quality cost analysis. Manage. Sci. 42 (1996) 1531–1543. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Tuan, How to Check if your iPhone 6S has TSMC or Samsung A9 Processor. Available at: https://www.techwalls.com/iphone-6s-plus-tsmc-samsung-cpu/ (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Venkatesan, Strategic sourcing: To make or not to make. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70 (1992) 98–107. [Google Scholar]
  • X.H. Wang, B.Z. Yang, Mixed-strategy equilibria in a quality differentiation model. Int. J. Ind. Organiz. 19 (2001) 213–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang, B. Niu and P. Guo, On the advantage of quantity leadership when outsourcing production to a competitive contract manufacturer. Prod. Oper. Manage. 22 (2013) 104–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Xiao, D. Yang and H. Shen, Coordinating a supply chain with a quality assurance policy via a revenue-sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49 (2011) 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Yan, Contract efficiency for a decentralized supply chain in the presence of quality improvement. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 22 (2015) 713–734. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Yu, A.Z. Zeng and L. Zhao, Single or dual sourcing: Decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks. Omega-Int. J. Manage. Sci. 37 (2009) 788–800. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Zhu, R.Q. Zhang and F. Tsung, Pushing quality improvement along supply chains. Manage. Sci. 53 (2007) 421–436. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Zhu and S.K. Mukhopadhyay, Optimal contract design for outsourcing: pricing and quality decisions. Int. J. Revenue Manage. 3 (2009) 197–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.