Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 58, Number 5, September-October 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 4621 - 4650 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024180 | |
Published online | 24 October 2024 |
Price and carbon emission reduction technology competition in the electricity supply chain based on power structure
1
College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, P.R. China
2
School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, P.R. China
3
School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, P.R. China
* Corresponding author: quange0216@njit.edu.cn
Received:
13
January
2024
Accepted:
11
September
2024
This study considers the research on electricity pricing and carbon reduction technology decisions of electricity supply chain enterprises under different power structures. It constructs a two-level electricity supply chain game model composed of two electricity producers and a single electricity retailer. By comparing the equilibrium solution results, the main research results are as follows: (1) in the market structure where electricity producers and electricity retailers make decisions at the same time, electricity producers are more willing to invest in low-carbon technologies and increase carbon emission reduction. The electricity retailer also set the lowest electricity prices at this time, and electricity demand is the highest. (2) In the case of the Stackelberg game for electricity producers, the wholesale electricity price is the highest, and the electricity producers obtain the most profits. In the case of the Stackelberg game for electricity retailers, the electricity price is the highest, and the profit of the electricity retailer is the highest. (3) In the market structure dominated by electricity retailers, the electricity price is the highest, and the electricity producers reduce the investment in carbon emission reduction technology after observation; the carbon emission reduction intensity is the least, and the electricity demand is also the least. (4) With the increase of price competition coefficient, the intensity of carbon emission reduction, electricity demand, electricity producers, and electricity retailer profit increase. However, as the competition coefficient of carbon reduction technology increases, these equilibrium solutions decline. We verify the above conclusions using multi-agent simulation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 91A80
Key words: Power structure / carbon reduction technology / electricity supply chain / game theory / multi-agent modeling
© The authors. Published by EDP Sciences, ROADEF, SMAI 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.