Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 27, Number 1, 1993
Page(s) 45 - 60
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/1993270100451
Published online 06 February 2017
  • R. D. AMSTRONG, W. D. COOK and L. M. SEIFORD, Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation: The Case of Ties, Management Sci., 1982, 28, 6, pp. 638-648. [MR: 668271] [Zbl: 0486.90005] [Google Scholar]
  • J. P. BARTHÉLÉMY, Caractérisations axiomatiques de la distance de la différence symétrique entre des relations binaires, Math. Sci. Hum., 1979, 77, 67, pp. 85-113. [EuDML: 94234] [Zbl: 0418.06003] [Google Scholar]
  • K. P. BOGART, Preference Structures I: Distance between Transitive Preference Relations, J. Math. Sociol., 1973, 3, pp. 49-67. [MR: 395936] [Zbl: 0303.92013] [Google Scholar]
  • K. P. BOGART, Preference Structures II: Distance between Asymmetrie Relations, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 1975, 29, 2, pp. 254-262. [MR: 395937] [Zbl: 0326.92018] [Google Scholar]
  • D. BOUYSSOU, Building criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA, in CARLOS A. BANA e COSTA Ed., Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 58-80. [Google Scholar]
  • L. B. CHERNYI and B. F. MIRKIN, Measurement of Distance between Distinct Partitions of a Finite Set of Objects, Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, translated from Russian in Automation andRemote Control, 1970, 31, 5, pp. 786-792. [MR: 300907] [Zbl: 0221.05029] [Google Scholar]
  • W. D. COOK, M. KRESS and L. M. SEIFORD, An Axiomatic Approach to Distance on Partial Ordering, RAIRO Rech. Opér., 1986a, 20, 2, pp. 115-122. [EuDML: 104894] [MR: 860910] [Zbl: 0607.90003] [Google Scholar]
  • W. D. COOK, M. KRESS and L. M. SEIFORD, Information and Preference in Partial Orders: A Bimatrix Representation, Psychometrika, 1986b, 51, 2, pp. 197-207. [MR: 848105] [Zbl: 0621.90013] [Google Scholar]
  • W. D. COOK and L. M. SEIFORD, Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation, Management Sci., 1978, 24, 16, pp. 1721-1732. [Zbl: 0491.90006] [Google Scholar]
  • S. GIAKOUMAKIS and B. MONJARDET, Coefficients d'accord entre deux préordres totaux, Stat. et Analyse des Données, 1987, 12, 1-2, pp. 96-99. [EuDML: 108950] [Zbl: 0645.06001] [Google Scholar]
  • A. GOICOECHEA, D. R. HANSEN and L. DUCKSTEIN, Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1982. [Zbl: 0584.90045] [Google Scholar]
  • E. JACQUET-LAGRÈZE, Interactive Assessment of Preferences using Holistic Judgments: The PREFCALC System, in CARLOS A. BANA e COSTA Ed., Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 335-350. [Google Scholar]
  • J. G. KEMENY, Mathematics without Numbers, Deadalus, 1959, 88, pp. 577-591. [Google Scholar]
  • J. G. KEMENY and J. C. SNELL, Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences, Ginaud Co., New York, 1962. [MR: 140375] [Zbl: 0256.92003] [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, ELECTRE III - un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples, Cahiers du CERO, 1978, 20, pp. 3-24 [MR: 496485] [Zbl: 0377.90003] [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, M. PRÉSENT and D. SILHOL, A Programming Method for Determining which Paris Metro Stations should be Renovated, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1986, 24, 2, pp. 318-334. [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, R. SLOWINSKI and W. TREICHEL, Multicriteria Programming of Water Supply Systems for Rural Areas, Water Resources Bulletin, 1992, 28, 1, pp. 13-31. [Google Scholar]
  • R. SLOWINSKI and W. TREICHEL, Multicriteria Analysis of Regional Water Supply Systems, in H.P. GEERING and M. MANSOUR Eds., Large Scale Systems, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1986, pp.745-748. [Google Scholar]
  • R. SLOWINSKI and W. TREICHEL, Multicriteria Decision Aid for Regional Water Supply System Programming, in Proc. 33. Intern. Wiss. Koll. TH Ilmenau 1988, Vortragsreihe Technische Kybernetik/Automatisierungstechnik, Ilmenau, DDR, 1988, pp. 281-284. [Google Scholar]
  • W. TREICHEL, Application of a MCDM Technique for Programming of Water Supply Systems, in Polish, Przeglad Statystyczny, 1987, 34, 4, pp.369-384. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.