EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 30 / No 2 (1996) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 30 2 (1996) 191-216 References
Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 30, Number 2, 1996
Page(s) 191 - 216
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/1996300201911
Published online 10 February 2017
  • C. A. BANA E COSTA, A problemática da rejeição em decisão multicritério, Investigação Operacional, 1986, 6, 1-2, p. 91-104. [Google Scholar]
  • C. A. BANA E COSTA, Existe-t-il une problématique du rejet relatif ?, communication présentée à la 25e Réunion du Groupe de Travail Européen « Aide Multicritère à la Décision », Bruxelles, mars 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • C. A. BANA E COSTA, A methodology for sensitivity analysis in three-criteria problems: a case study in municipal management, Eur. J. Opl. Res., 1988, 33, p. 159-173. [Google Scholar]
  • C. A. BANA E COSTA, Estudo de apoio à tomada de decisão para a localização de dez novos NACE (rapport technique), CISED, CRL, Lisbonne, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • C. A. BANA E COSTA, Absolute and relative evaluation problematics. The concept of neutral level and the MCDA Robot Technique, in M. Cerny, D. Glückaufová and D. Loula (eds.), 1992, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multicriteria Decision Making, Methods-Algorithms-Applications, Liblice, March 18-22, 1991, Prague, p. 7-15. [Google Scholar]
  • C. A. BANA E COSTA et M. CAMPOS DE ALMEIDA, MEMSOR - método multicritério parasegmentação ordenada, Investigação Operacional, 1990, 10, 1, p. 19-28. [Google Scholar]
  • C. A. BANA E COSTA et J.-C. VANSNICK, Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive model, Journal of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis (à paraître). [Zbl: 0934.90043] [Google Scholar]
  • C. A. BANA E COSTA et Ph. VINCKE, Measuring credibility of compensatory preference statements when trade-offs are interval determined, Theory and Decision, 1995, 39, p. 127-155. [MR: 1348628] [Zbl: 0845.90007] [Google Scholar]
  • P. BARAHONA et M. VELOSO, A framework for causal reasoning with a functional approach, in M. Stefanelli, A. Hasman, M. Fieschi and J. Talmon (eds.), AIME 91, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 1991, Springer-Verlag, p. 85-94. [Google Scholar]
  • A. L. BLUMENTHAL, The Process of Cognition, Prentice-Hall, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • J. C. COURBON, Processus de décision et aide à la décision, Economies et Sociétés, Séries Sciences de Gestion, 1982, 3, tome XVI, p. 1455-1476. [Google Scholar]
  • R. M. DAWES, The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making, American Psychologist, 1979, 14, p. 571-582. [Google Scholar]
  • E. KASANEN, R. OSTERMARK et M. ZELENY, GESTALT system of holistic graphics: new management support view of MCDM, Computers Ops Res., 1991, 18, 2, p. 233-239. [MR: 1090178] [Google Scholar]
  • R. L. KEENEY et K. NAIR, Selecting nuclear power plant sites in the Pacific north-west using decision analysis, in D. E. Bell, R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa (eds.), Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, John Wiley, 1977, p. 298-322. [MR: 459511] [Google Scholar]
  • O. I. LARICHEV et H. M. MOSHKOVISH, An approach to ordinal classification problem, International Transactions in Operational Research, 1994, I, 3, p. 375-385. [Zbl: 0854.90086] [Google Scholar]
  • T. T. LIANG et B. B. BUCLATIN, Improving the utilization of training resources through optimal personnel assignment in the U.S. Navy, Eur. J. Opl. Res., 1988, 33, 2, p. 183-190. [Google Scholar]
  • R. MASSAGLIA et A. OSTANELLO, N-TOMIC: a support system for multicriteria segmentation problems, in P. Korthonen, A. Lewandowski and J. Wallenius (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Support, Springer-Verlag, 1991, p. 167-174. [MR: 1124442] [Zbl: 0825.90597] [Google Scholar]
  • J. MOSCAROLA et B. ROY, Procédure automatique d'examen de dossiers fondée sur une segmentation trichotomique en présence de critères multiples, RAIRO Recherche Opérationnelle, 1977, 11, 2, p. 145-173. [EuDML: 104659] [MR: 443983] [Zbl: 0367.90114] [Google Scholar]
  • A. OSTANELLO, Comparaison d'approches pour la définition de poids des critères, communication présentée à la 25e Réunion du Groupe de Travail Européen « Aide Multicritère à la Décision », Bruxelles, mars 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. PAWLAK et R. SLOWINSKI, Decision analysis using rough sets, International Transactions in Operational Research, 1994, 1, 1, p. 107. [Zbl: 0854.90088] [Google Scholar]
  • N. RESCHER, Introduction to Value Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, How outranking relation hemps multiple criteria decision making, in J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, The University of South Carolina Press, 1973, p. 179-201. [MR: 443858] [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, Vers une méthodologie générale d'aide à la décision, Revue METRA, XIV, 3, p. 459-497. [MR: 421617] [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, Critique et dépassement de la problématique de l'optimisation, Cahiers SEMA 1977, 1, p. 65-79. [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY (En langue anglaise, The optimisation problem formulation: criticism and overstepping, J. Opl. Res. Soc., 1981, 32, 6, p. 427-436. [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, A multicriteria analysis for trichotomic segmentation problems, in P. Nijkamp and J. Spronk (eds.), Multiple Criteria Analysis: Operational Methods, Gower, 1981, p. 245-257. [Zbl: 0464.90068] [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, Méthodologie Multicritère d'Aide à la Décision, Économica, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY, The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, in C. A. Bana e Costa (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, 1990, Springer-Verlag, p. 155-183. [MR: 1118821] [Google Scholar]
  • B. ROY et D. BOUYSSOU, Aide Multicritère à la Décision : Méthodes et Cas, 1993, Économica. [Zbl: 0925.90230] [Google Scholar]
  • T. L. SAATY, Absolute and relative measurement with the AHP; the most livable cities in the United States, Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci., 1986, 20, 6, p. 327-331. [Google Scholar]
  • T. L. SAATY, Rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the analytic hierarchy decision process, Decision Sci., 1987, 18, 2, p. 157-177. [Google Scholar]
  • P. SOELBERG, Unprogrammed decision making, Industrial Management Review, 1967, Spring, p. 19-29. [Google Scholar]
  • L. V. TAVARES et C. A. BANA E COSTA, Pré-selecção de candidatos a um concurso público (rapport technique), CESUR, Lisbonne, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • A. TVERSKY, Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice, Psych. Rev., 1971, 79, p. 281-299. [Google Scholar]
  • J.-C. VANSNICK, Application of multicriteria decision-aid to allocating budget for building repairs and maintenance, in M. T. Tabucanon and V. Chankong (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Applications in Industry and Service, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, 6-8 décembre 1989, p. 629-642. [Google Scholar]
  • Ph. VINCKE, L'Aide Multicritère à la Décision, 1989, Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles et Éditions Ellipses. [Zbl: 0673.90022] [Google Scholar]
  • D. VON WINTERFELDT et W. EDWARDS, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, 1986, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • G. H. VON WRIGHT, The Logic of Preference, 1963, Edinburgh University Press. [Zbl: 0252.02023] [Google Scholar]
  • W. YU, ELECTRE TRI, Aspects méthodologiques et manuel d'utilisation (version 1.0), Université de Paris-Dauphine, Document du LAMSADE n° 74, 1992. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.