Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, 2021
Regular articles published in advance of the transition of the journal to Subscribe to Open (S2O). Free supplement sponsored by the Fonds National pour la Science Ouverte
Page(s) S2013 - S2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2020068
Published online 02 March 2021
  • P. Andersen and N.C. Andersen, A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39 (1993) 1261–1264. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Azadi, M. Jafarian, R. Farzipoor Saen and S.M. Mirhedayatian, A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Comput. Oper. Res. 54 (2015) 274–285. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Bai, F. Zhang and Y. Liu, Modeling Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis under robust input and output data. RAIRO:OR 52 (2018) 619–643. [Google Scholar]
  • J.J. Buckley, Fuzzy complex numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 33 (1989) 333–345. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Chakraborty and D. Guha, Addition of two generalized fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Ind. Math. 2 (2010) 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–44. [Google Scholar]
  • R.V. Churchill, J.W. Brown and R.F. v, Complex Variables and Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1974). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Esfandiari, S. Saati, M. Navabakhsh and K. Khalili-Damghani, A novel data envelopment analysis model with complex numbers: measuring the efficiency of electric generators in steam power plants. Oper. Res. Decis. 29 (2019) 41–52. [Google Scholar]
  • M.J. Farrell, The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 120 (1957) 253–281. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Guo and H. Tanaka, Fuzzy DEA: a perceptual evaluation method. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 119 (2001) 149–160. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Guo, H. Tanaka and M. Inuiguchi, Self-organizing fuzzy aggregation models to rank the objects with multiple attributes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans 30 (2000) 573–580. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hatami-Marbini, A. Emrouznejad and M. Tavana, A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214 (2011) 457–472. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Lertworasirikul, S.C. Fang, J.A. Joines and H.L.W. Nuttle, A possibility approach to fuzzy data envelopment analysis. In: Vol. 6 of Proceedings of the Joint Conference On Information Sciences. Duke University/Association for Intelligent Machinery, Durham, NC (2002), 176–179. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Lertworasirikul, S.C. Fang, H.L.W. Nuttle and J.A. Joines, Fuzzy data envelopment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th Bellman Continuum, Beijing (2002), 342. [Google Scholar]
  • S.H. Mirzaei and A. Salehi, Ranking efficient DMUs using the Tchebycheff norm with fuzzy data in DEA. Int. J. Res. Ind. Eng. 8 (2019) 158–175. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Saati, A. Memariani and G.R. Jahanshahloo, Efficiency analysis and ranking of DMUs with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 1 (2002) 255–267. [Google Scholar]
  • J.K. Sengupta, A fuzzy system approach in Data Envelopment Analysis. Comput. Math. App. 24 (1992) 259–266. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Tavassoli, R. Farzipoor-Saen and D. Mohamadi Zanjirani, Assessing sustainability of suppliers: a novel stochastic-fuzzy DEA model. Sustainable Prod. Consump. 21 (2020) 78–91. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Tlig and A. Hamed, Assessing the Efficiency of commercial Tunisian Banks using fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis. J. Data Envelopment Anal. Decis. Sci. 2 (2017) 14–27. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Xin and Sh. Qiang, Fuzzy complex numbers and their application for classifiers performance evaluation. Pattern Recognit. 44 (2011) 1403–1417. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.