Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, Number 3, May-June 2021
Page(s) 1213 - 1229
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021059
Published online 11 May 2021
  • H. Allaoui, Y. Guo, A. Choudhary and J. Bloemhof, Sustainable agro-food supply chain design using two-stage hybrid multi-objective decision-making approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 89 (2018) 369–384. [Google Scholar]
  • J.A. Alonso and M.T. Lamata, Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst. 14 (2006) 445–459. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Antucheviciene and J. Saparauskas, MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: Verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 47 (2013) 5–20. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Araz, P.M. Ozfirat and I. Ozkarahan, An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management. Comput. Oper. Res. 34 (2007) 3738–3756. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Arroyo, I.D. Tommelein and G. Ballard, Comparing AHP and CBA as decision methods to resolve the choosing problem in detailed design. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (2014) 04014063. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Baležentis and S. Zeng, Group multi-criteria decision making based upon interval-valued fuzzy numbers: an extension of the MULTIMOORA method. Expert Syst. App. 40 (2013) 543–550. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Behzadian, R.B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi and M. Aghdasi, PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 200 (2010) 198–215. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Behzadian, S. Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, M. Yazdani and J. Ignatius, A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst. App. 39 (2012) 13051–13069. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Bonvin and D.A. Mellichamp, A generalized structural dominance method for the analysis of large-scale systems. Int. J. Control 35 (1982) 807–827. [Google Scholar]
  • W.K.M. Brauers, Multi-objective seaport planning by MOORA decision making. Ann. Oper. Res. 206 (2013) 39–58. [Google Scholar]
  • W.K. Brauers, Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society, A Revolution in Economic Thinking By Multi-Objective Optimization. In: Vol. 342 of Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers and Springer, Boston-Dordrecht-London (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Chakraborty and E.K. Zavadskas, Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making. Informatica 25 (2014) 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Corrente, S. Greco and R. Słowiński, Multiple criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega 41 (2013) 820–846. [Google Scholar]
  • T.F. Cox and M.A. Cox, Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • V.P. Darji and R.V. Rao, Application of AHP/EVAMIX method for decision making in the industrial environment. Am. J. Oper. Res. 3 (2013) 542. [Google Scholar]
  • R. de FSM Russo, R. Camanho, Criteria in AHP: a systematic review of literature. Proc. Comput. Sci. 55 (2015) 1123–1132. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Emrouznejad and M. Marra, The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55 (2017) 6653–6675. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Figueira and B. Roy, Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 139 (2002) 317–326. [Google Scholar]
  • J.R. Figueira, V. Mousseau and B. Roy, ELECTRE methods. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York, NY (2005) 133–153. [Google Scholar]
  • J.R. Figueira, S. Greco, B. Roy and R. Słowiński, An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 20 (2013) 61–85. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Govindan and M.B. Jepsen, ELECTRE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250 (2016) 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • P.T. Harker and L.G. Vargas, The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Manage. Sci. 33 (1987) 1383–1403. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Hinloopen, P. Nijkamp and P. Rietveld, The regime method: a new multicriteria technique. Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. In: Vol. 209 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1983) 146–155. [Google Scholar]
  • C.L. Hwang, Y.J. Lai and T.Y. Liu, A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput. Oper. Res. 20 (1993) 889–899. [Google Scholar]
  • H.C. Liu, X.J. Fan, P. Li and Y.Z. Chen, Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment. Eng. App. Artif. Intell. 34 (2014) 168–177. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan and A. Valipour, Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28 (2015) 516–571. [Google Scholar]
  • R.T. Marler and J.S. Arora, The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Struct. Multi. Optim. 41 (2010) 853–862. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Munda, A NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manage. 6 (2006) 65–78. [Google Scholar]
  • E.E. Noble and P.P. Sanchez, A note on the information content of a consistent pairwise comparison judgment matrix of an AHP decision maker. Theory Decis. 34 (1993) 99–108. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Rezaian and S.A. Jozi, Health-safety and environmental risk assessment of refineries using of multi criteria decision making method. Apcbee Proc. 3 (2012) 235–238. [Google Scholar]
  • T.L. Saaty, Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15 (1977) 234–281. [Google Scholar]
  • T.L. Saaty, The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • T.L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1 (2008) 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  • T.L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process: The Organization and Prioritization of Complexity. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • V. Sangiorgio, G. Uva and F. Fatiguso, Optimized AHP to overcome limits in weight calculation: a building performance application. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2017) 04017101. [Google Scholar]
  • V. Sangiorgio, G. Uva and F. Fatiguso, User reporting-based semeiotic assessment of existing building stock at the regional scale. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (2018) 04018079. [Google Scholar]
  • V. Sangiorgio, G. Uva, F. Fatiguso and J.M. Adam, A new index to evaluate exposure and potential damage to RC building structures in coastal areas. Eng. Fail. Anal. 100 (2019) 439–455. [Google Scholar]
  • H.S. Shih, H.J. Shyur and E.S. Lee, An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math. Comput. Model. 45 (2007) 801–813. [Google Scholar]
  • G.H. Tzeng and J.J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Velasquez and P.T. Hester, An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10 (2013) 56–66. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.M. Wang, On lexicographic goal programming method for generating weights from inconsistent interval comparison matrices. Appl. Math. Comput. 173 (2006) 985–991. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Wang, Z. Zhou, H. Ishibuchi, T. Liao and T. Zhang, Localized weighted sum method for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 22 (2016) 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Xie, Modeling decision processes of a green supply chain with regulation on energy saving level. Comput. Oper. Res. 54 (2015) 266–273. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.