Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, Number 6, November-December 2021
Page(s) 3817 - 3844
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021176
Published online 24 December 2021
  • Accenture, New “disruptability index” busts widespread myth that industry disruption is a random occurrence. Available at: https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/nearly-two-thirds-of-large-companies-globally-face-high-levels-of-industry-disruption-accenture-study-finds.htm (Access on February 26, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Adner and R. Kapoor, Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Manage. J. 31 (2010) 306–333. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Adner and R. Kapoor, Right tech, wrong time. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94 (2016) 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Adner and P. Zemsky, Disruptive technologies and the emergence of competition. RAND J. Econ. 36 (2005) 229–254. [Google Scholar]
  • M.-L. Allain, E. Henry and M. Kyle, Competition and the efficiency of markets for technology. Manage. Sci. 62 (2016) 1000–1019. [Google Scholar]
  • E.J. Anderson and S.J. Sunny Yang, The timing of capacity investment with lead times: When do firms act in unison? Prod. Oper. Manage. 24 (2015) 21–41. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Ansari, R. Garud and A. Kumaraswamy, The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the US television ecosystem. Strategic Manage. J. 37 (2016) 1829–1853. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Arora, A. Fosfuri and T. Rønde, Managing licensing in a market for technology. Manage. Sci. 59 (2013) 1092–1106. [Google Scholar]
  • F.M. Bass, A new product growth for model consumer durables. Manage. Sci. 15 (1969) 215–227. [Google Scholar]
  • S.R. Bhaskaran and K. Ramachandran, Managing technology selection and development risk in competitive environments. Prod. Oper. Manage. 20 (2011) 541–555. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Bildosola, G. Garechana, E. Zarrabeitia and E. Cilleruelo, Characterization of strategic emerging technologies: the case of big data. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28 (2020) 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Boston Consulting Group, Flipping the odds of digital transformation success. Available at: https://www.bcg.com/zh-cn/publications/2020/increasing-odds-of-success-in-digital-transformation (Access on October 29, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • M.-J. Chen and D. Miller, Competitive dynamics: themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Acad. Manage. Ann. 6 (2012) 135–210. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen and Ö. Turut, Context-dependent preferences and innovation strategy. Manage. Sci. 59 (2013) 2747–2765. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Chen, J. Zhang and R.-S. Guo, The D-Day, V-Day, and bleak days of a disruptive technology: a new model for ex-ante evaluation of the timing of technology disruption. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 251 (2016) 562–574. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Chen, Y.J. Hu and M.D. Smith, The impact of E-book distribution on print sales: analysis of a natural experiment. Manage. Sci. 65 (2019) 19–31. [Google Scholar]
  • C.M. Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • C.M. Christensen, R. McDonald, E.J. Altman and J.E. Palmer, Disruptive innovation: an intellectual history and directions for future research. J. Manage. Stud. 55 (2018) 1043–1078. [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Cohen, J. Eliasberg and T.-H. Ho, New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Manage. Sci. 42 (1996) 173–186. [Google Scholar]
  • K.R. Conner, Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging “clones” pay?. Manage. Sci. 41 (1995) 209–225. [Google Scholar]
  • J.A. Cookson, Anticipated entry and entry deterrence: evidence from the American casino industry. Manage. Sci. 64 (2018) 2325–2344. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Crowley, Product and service innovation and discontinuation in manufacturing and service firms in Europe. Eur. J. Innov. Manage. 20 (2017) 250–268. [Google Scholar]
  • R.A. D’Aveni, G.B. Dagnino and K.G. Smith, The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Manage. J. 31 (2010) 1371–1385. [Google Scholar]
  • G.B. Dagnino, P.M. Picone and G. Ferrigno, Temporary competitive advantage: a state-of-the-art literature review and research directions. Int. J. Manage. Rev. 23 (2021) 85–115. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Ernzer and W. Wimmer, From environmental assessment results to design for environment product changes: an evaluation of quantitative and qualitative methods. J. Eng. Des. 13 (2002) 233–242. [Google Scholar]
  • R.N. Foster, Working the S-curve: assessing technological threats. Res. Manage. 29 (1986) 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Frizzo-Barker, P.A. Chow-White, P.R. Adams, J. Mentanko, D. Ha and S. Green, Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: a systematic review. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 51 (2020) 102029. [Google Scholar]
  • J.J. Gabszewicz and J.-F. Thisse, Spatial Competition and the Location of Firms. Harwood Academic Publishers Chur, Switzerland (1986). [Google Scholar]
  • C. Giachetti, J. Lampel and S.L. Pira, Red queen competitive imitation in the UK mobile phone industry. Acad. Manage. J. 60 (2017) 1882–1914. [Google Scholar]
  • G.M. Grossman and E. Helpman, Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58 (1991) 43–61. [Google Scholar]
  • D.A. Guttentag and S.L. Smith, Assessing Airbnb as a disruptive innovation relative to hotels: substitution and comparative performance expectations. Int. J. Hospitality Manage. 64 (2017) 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Ha, X. Long and J. Nasiry, Quality in supply chain encroachment. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 18 (2016) 280–298. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hagiu and E.J. Altman, Finding the platform in your product. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95 (2017) 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Hamzeh and X. Xu, Technology selection methods and applications in manufacturing: a review from 1990 to 2017. Comput. Ind. Eng. 138 (2019) 106123. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Huang and G. Sošić, Analysis of industry equilibria in models with sustaining and disruptive technology. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207 (2010) 238–248. [Google Scholar]
  • N.F. Huberts, H. Dawid, K.J. Huisman and P.M. Kort, Entry deterrence by timing rather than overinvestment in a strategic real options framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 274 (2019) 165–185. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Iyengar, C. Van den Bulte and T.W. Valente, Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Market. Sci. 30 (2011) 195–212. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Jain and K. Ramdas, Up or out – or stay put? Product positioning in an evolving technology environment. Prod. Oper. Manage. 14 (2005) 362–376. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Janssen, V. Weerakkody, E. Ismagilova, U. Sivarajah and Z. Irani, A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: integrating institutional, market and technical factors. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 50 (2020) 302–309. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Jerath, S.-H. Kim and R. Swinney, Product quality in a distribution channel with inventory risk. Market. Sci. 36 (2017) 747–761. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Jiang, X.S. Qu and D.C. Jain, Optimal market entry timing for successive generations of technological innovations. MIS Q. Forthcoming (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • R.A. Kerin, P.R. Varadarajan and R.A. Peterson, First-mover advantage: a synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. J. Market. 56 (1992) 33–52. [Google Scholar]
  • S.N. Kirshner, Y. Levin and M. Nediak, Product upgrades with stochastic technology advancement, product failure, and brand commitment. Prod. Oper. Manage. 26 (2017) 742–756. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Klastorin and W. Tsai, New product introduction: timing, design, and pricing. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 6 (2004) 302–320. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Knudsen, D.A. Levinthal and S.G. Winter, Hidden but in plain sight: the role of scale adjustment in industry dynamics. Strategic Manage. J. 35 (2014) 1569–1584. [Google Scholar]
  • V. Krishnan and W. Zhu, Designing a family of development-intensive products. Manage. Sci. 52 (2006) 813–825. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Kwark, J. Chen and S. Raghunathan, User-generated content and competing firms’ product design. Manage. Sci. 64 (2018) 4608–4628. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Lacourbe, C.H. Loch and S. Kavadias, Product positioning in a two-dimensional market space. Prod. Oper. Manage. 18 (2009) 315–332. [Google Scholar]
  • D.O. Lauga and E. Ofek, Market research and innovation strategy in a duopoly. Market. Sci. 28 (2009) 373–396. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Majumdar, P.K. Banerji and S. Chakrabarti, Disruptive technology and disruptive innovation: ignore at your peril! Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 30 (2018) 1247–1255. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Marx, J.S. Gans and D.H. Hsu, Dynamic commercialization strategies for disruptive technologies: evidence from the speech recognition industry. Manage. Sci. 60 (2014) 3103–3123. [Google Scholar]
  • D.B. Montgomery, M.C. Moore and J.E. Urbany, Reasoning about competitive reactions: evidence from executives. Market. Sci. 24 (2005) 138–149. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Nagy, J. Schuessler and A. Dubinsky, Defining and identifying disruptive innovations. Ind. Market. Manage. 57 (2016) 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  • G.F. Özkan-Seely, Strategies for environmental and traditional quality efforts during new product development: balancing complementarity and conflict. Qual. Manage. J. 21 (2014) 23–35. [Google Scholar]
  • A.K. Parlaktürk, The value of product variety when selling to strategic consumers. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 14 (2012) 371–385. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Peres, E. Muller and V. Mahajan, Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: a critical review and research directions. Int. J. Res. Market. 27 (2010) 91–106. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Petzold, L. Landinez and T. Baaken, Disruptive innovation from a process view: a systematic literature review. Creativity Innov. Manage. 28 (2019) 157–174. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Rakthin, R.J. Calantone and J.F. Wang, Managing market intelligence: the comparative role of absorptive capacity and market orientation. J. Bus. Res. 69 (2016) 5569–5577. [Google Scholar]
  • R.C. Seamans, Threat of entry, asymmetric information, and pricing. Strategic Manage. J. 34 (2013) 426–444. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Si, S.A. Zahra, X. Wu and D.J.-F. Jeng, Disruptive innovation and entrepreneurship in emerging economics. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 58 (2020) 101601. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Steiber, S. Alänge, S. Ghosh and D. Goncalves, Digital transformation of industrial firms: an innovation diffusion perspective. Eur. J. Innov. Manage. 24 (2020) 799–819. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Swinney, G.P. Cachon and S. Netessine, Capacity investment timing by start-ups and established firms in new markets. Manage. Sci. 57 (2011) 763–777. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Uzunca, A competence-based view of industry evolution: the impact of submarket convergence on incumbent–entrant dynamics. Acad. Manage. J. 61 (2018) 738–768. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Woo and C.L. Magee, Relationship between technological improvement and innovation diffusion: an empirical test. Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. (2021) 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • C.-H. Wu, Price competition and technology licensing in a dynamic duopoly. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 267 (2018) 570–584. [Google Scholar]
  • C.-H. Wu and J.-Y. Lai, Dynamic pricing and competitive time-to-market strategy of new product launch under a multistage duopoly. Eur. J. Oper. Res 277 (2019) 138–152. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Yang, A. Jiang and J. Zhang, Optimal timing of big data application in a two-period decision model with new product sales. Comput. Ind. Eng. 160 (2021) 107550. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Yenipazarli, Incentives for environmental research and development: consumer preferences, competitive pressure and emissions taxation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 276 (2019) 757–769. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhan, T. Xu, X. Xu and Y. Jin, Trade credit or vertical merger strategy for financial constrained retailer in a supply chain with asymmetric competing retailers. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 1617–1641. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Zhu and N. Furr, Products to platforms: making the leap. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94 (2016) 72–78. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Zhu and G. Wu, Green product diffusion: the impacts of asymmetric retailers’ strategic product decisions. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 1459–1486. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.