EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 / No 5 (September-October 2022) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 56 5 (2022) 3611-3634 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 56, Number 5, September-October 2022
Page(s) 3611 - 3634
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022162
Published online 19 October 2022
  • L.E. Dubins and L.J. Savage, How to Gamble if You Must: Inequalities for Stochastic Processes, 1965 edition. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965). 1976 edition. Dover, New York (1976). [Google Scholar]
  • V.C. Pestien and W.D. Sudderth, Continuous-time red and black: How to control a diffusion to a goal. Math. Oper. Res. 10 (1985) 599–611. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Browne, Optimal investment policies for a firm with random risk process: Exponential utility and minimizing the probability of ruin. Math. Oper. Res. 20 (1995) 937–958. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Browne, Survival and growth with a liability: Optimal portfolio strategies in continuous time. Math. Oper. Res. 22 (1997) 468–493. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Browne, Reaching goals by a deadline: Digital options and continuous-time active portfolio management. Adv. Appl. Probab. 31 (1999) 551–577. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Browne, Beating a moving target: Optimal portfolio strategies for outperforming a stochastic benchmark. Finance Stoch. 3 (1999) 275–294. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • I. Karatzas, Adaptive control of a diffusion to a goal, and a parabolic Monge-Ampre-type equation. Asian J. Math 1 (1997) 295–313. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Liang and V.R. Young, Reaching a bequest goal with life insurance. ASTIN Bull.: J. IAA 50 (2020) 187–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Bayraktar and V.R. Young, Optimally investing to reach a bequest goal. Insur.: Math. Econ. 70 (2016) 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Bayraktar, S.D. Promislow and V.R. Young, Purchasing life insurance to reach a bequest goal. Insur.: Math. Econ. 58 (2014) 204–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Bayraktar, S.D. Promislow and V.R. Young, Purchasing term life insurance to reach a bequest goal while consuming. SIAM J. Financial Math. 7 (2016) 183–214. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Han, Z. Liang, K. Yuen and Y. Yuan, Minimizing the probability of absolute ruin under ambiguity aversion. Appl. Math. Optim. 84 (2021) 2495–2525. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Li and V.R. Young, Optimal reinsurance to minimize the probability of ruin under ambiguity. Insur.: Math. Econ. 87 (2019) 143–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Schmidli, On minimizing the ruin probability of investment and reinsurance. J. Appl. Probab. 12 (2002) 890–907. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Promislow and V.R. Young, Minimizing the probability of ruin when claims follow Brownian motion with drift. N. Am. Actuar. J. 9 (2005) 109–128. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Luo, Ruin minimization for insurers with borrowing constraints. N. Am. Actuar. J. 12 (2008) 143–174. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Yener, Maximizing survival, growth and goal reaching under borrowing constraints. Quant. Finance 15 (2015) 2053–2065. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Han, Z. Liang and C. Zhang, Optimal proportional reinsurance with common shock dependence to minimize the probability of drawdown. Ann. Actuar. Sci. 13 (2019) 268–294. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Luo, M. Wang and W. Zhu, Maximizing a robust goal-reaching probability with penalization on ambiguity. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 348 (2019) 261–281. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Milevsky and C. Robinson, Self-annuitization and ruin in retirement with discussion. N. Am. Actuar. J. 4 (2000) 112–129. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • V.R. Young, Optimal investment strategy to minimize the probability of lifetime ruin. N. Am. Actuar. J. 8 (2004) 105–126. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Wang, Aggregation of correlated risk portfolios: Models and algorithms. Proc. Casualty Actuar. Soc. 85 (1998) 848–939. [Google Scholar]
  • K.C. Yuen, J. Guo and X. Wu, On a correlated aggregate claim model with Poisson and Erlang risk process. Insur.: Math. Econ. 31 (2002) 205–214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K.C. Yuen, J. Guo and X. Wu, On the first time of ruin in the bivariatecompound Poisson model. Insur.: Math. Econ. 38 (2006) 298–308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Centeno, Dependent risks and excess of loss reinsurance. Insur.: Math. Econ. 37 (2005) 229–238. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Bai, J. Cai and M. Zhou, Optimal reinsurance policies for an insurer with abivariate reserve risk process in a dynamic setting. Insur.: Math. Econ. 53 (2013) 664–670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K.C. Yuen, Z. Liang and M. Zhou, Optimal proportional reinsurance with common shock dependence. Insur.: Math. Econ. 64 (2015) 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Liang and K.C. Yuen, Optimal dynamic reinsurance with dependent risks: Variance premium principle. Scand. Actuar. J. 2016 (2016) 18–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Liang and V.R. Young, Minimizing the probability of lifetime ruin: Two riskless assets with transaction costs. ASTIN Bull.: J. IAA 49 (2019) 847–883. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Bi, Z. Liang and K.C. Yuen, Optimal mean variance investment/reinsurance with common shock in a regime-switching market. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 90 (2019) 109–135. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Grandell, Aspects of Risk Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.