Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 57, Number 2, March-April 2023
Graphs, Combinatorics, Algorithms and Optimization
Page(s) 905 - 912
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023030
Published online 28 April 2023
  • P.W. Shor, Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring, in Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE (1994) 124–134. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Magesan, J.M. Gambetta and J. Emerson, Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking. Phys. Rev. A 85 (2012) 042311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Magesan, J.M. Gambetta and J. Emerson, Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes. Phys. Revi. Lett. 106 (2011) 180504. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Combes, C. Granade, C. Ferrie and S.T. Flammia, Logical randomized benchmarking. Preprint arXiv:1702.03688 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Morvan, V. Ramasesh, M. Blok, J. Kreikebaum, K. O’Brien, L. Chen, B. Mitchell, R. Naik, D. Santiago and I. Siddiqi, Qutrit randomized benchmarking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 210504. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • W.G. Brown and B. Eastin, Randomized benchmarking with restricted gate sets. Phys. Rev. A 97 (2018) 062323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Magesan, J.M. Gambetta, B.R. Johnson, C.A. Ryan, J.M. Chow, S.T. Merkel, M.P. Da Silva, G.A. Keefe, M.B. Rothwell, T.A. Ohki and M.B. Ketchen, Efficient measurement of quantum gate error by interleaved randomized benchmarking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 080505. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • T.J. Proctor, A. Carignan-Dugas, K. Rudinger, E. Nielsen and R. Blume-Kohout, K. Young, Direct randomized benchmarking for multiqubit devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 030503. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Harper and S.T. Flammia, Fault-tolerant logical gates in the IBM quantum experience. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 080504. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hashagen, S. Flammia, D. Gross and J. Wallman, Real randomized benchmarking. Quantum 2 (2018) 85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.M. Steane, Error correcting codes in quantum theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 793. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • A.R. Calderbank and P.W. Shor, Good quantum error-correcting codes exist. Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996) 1098. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Steane, Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 452 (1996) 2551–2577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.-N. Guo, Q.-L. Tian, K. Zeng and Z.-D. Li, Quantum coherence of two-qubit over quantum channels with memory. Quantum Inf. Process. 16 (2017) 1–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G. Aleksandrowicz, T. Alexander, P. Barkoutsos, L. Bello, Y. Ben-Haim, D. Bucher, F.J. Cabrera-Hernández, J. Carballo-Franquis, A. Chen, C.F. Chen and J.M. Chow, Qiskit: an open-source framework for quantum computing (2019). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2562111. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.