Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 58, Number 1, January-February 2024
Page(s) 881 - 908
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023185
Published online 22 February 2024
  • L.H. Wang, Research on farmers’ credit improvement mechanism for external financing of agricultural supply chain. Ph.D. thesis, China Agricultural University (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • T.R. Wang, Q.G. Lan and Y.Z. Chu, Supply chain financing model: based on China’s agricultural products supply chain. Appl. Mech. Mater. 380 (2013) 4417–4421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Ye, J.H. Huang and Q. Lin, Optimal decision making of farmers in a contract farming supply chain under financial constraints. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. (2017) 1467–1478. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Mondal and S.K. Roy, Application of choquet integral in interval type-2 pythagorean fuzzy sustainable supply chain management under risk. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 37 (2022) 217–263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Barman, S.K. Roy, L. Sakalauskas and G.-W. Weber, Inventory model involving reworking of faulty products with three carbon policies under neutrosophic environment. Adv. Eng. Inf. 57 (2023) 102081. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Mondal, B.K. Giri and S.K. Roy, An integrated sustainable bio-fuel and bio-energy supply chain: a novel approach based on dematel and fuzzy-random robust flexible programming with me measure. Appl. Energy 343 (2023) 121225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Lin and F. Ye, Nash negotiation model of “company+farmers”-type order agriculture supply chain. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 4 (2014) 1769–1778. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Guo, R.W. Jolly and J. Zhu, Contract farming in china: perspectives of farm households and agribusiness firms. Comp. Econ. Stud. 49 (2007) 285–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Ye and Z.G. Cai, Research on “company+farmer” contract farming supply chain decision model with two way compensation mechanism. Oper. Res. Manage. 27 (2018) 186–193. [Google Scholar]
  • L.M. Young and J.E. Hobbs, Vertical linkages in agri-food supply chains: changing roles for producers, commodity groups, and government policy. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 24 (2002) 428–441. [Google Scholar]
  • G.H. Hu and M. Zheng, Discussion on the operation mode and revenue distribution of agricultural supply chain finance. Rural Econ. (2013) 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  • S.G. Timme and C. Williams-Timme, The financial-SCM connection. Supply Chain Manage. Rev. 4 (2000) 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Miller, Agricultural value chain finance strategy and design. Technical note (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • T. Breckwoldt, Management of grain storage in Old Babylonian Larsa. Archiv für Orientforschung (1995) 64–88. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Moers, Cereal banks: receipt of deposit as a method for improving liquidity at the local level. Fundation Desar-rollo Empresarial 6 (1999) 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Joerg, Securing the frontier supplies commodity financing. Trade Finan. 9 (2002) 6–8. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Bogetoft and H.B. Olesen, Ten rules of thumb in contract design: lessons from Danish agriculture. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 29 (2002) 185–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Kazaz and S. Webster, The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 13 (2011) 404–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Dries, E. Germenji, N. Noev and J.F. Swinnen, Farmers, vertical coordination, and the restructuring of dairy supply chains in Central and Eastern Europe. World Dev. 37 (2009) 1742–1758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen, H. Tu and Y. Zeng, Loan pricing and production regulation mechanism of agricultural supply chain finance. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 38 (2018) 1706–1716. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Deng, W. Xu and J. Luo, Optimal loan pricing for agricultural supply chains from a green credit perspective. Sustainability 13 (2021) 12365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Ji, L. Jiang and D. Zhao, A dual-channel supply chain ordering and pricing strategy considering consumer preferences under different financing models. Ind. Eng. Manage. 22 (2017) 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Zhu, G. Wang and C. Wang, Operation decision of “company+farmers” order agriculture supply chain under different financing models. Ind. Eng. Manage. 24 (2019) 16–21+31. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Shi, H. Peng and J. Cong, Research on internal and external financing strategies of order agriculture supply chain under financial constraints. Oper. Res. Manage. 29 (2020) 62–69. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Guo and W. Wang, Choice of supply chain financing methods for order agriculture under purchase price uncertainty-external financing vs. internal financing. Oper. Res. Manage. 29 (2020) 188–196+230. [Google Scholar]
  • C. O’Toole and T. Hennessy, Do decoupled payments affect investment financing constraints? Evidence from irish agriculture. Food Policy 56 (2015) 67–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Peng and T. Pang, Research on financing and operation strategy of order agriculture supply chain under agricultural subsidy policy. J. Manage. Eng. 34 (2020) 155–163. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Huang and Q. Lin, Guaranteed insurance and government subsidy mechanism in order agriculture supply chain financing under output uncertainty, China. Manage. Sci. 27 (2019) 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  • S.S. Sana, Price competition between green and non green products under corporate social responsible firm. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 55 (2020) 102118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.S. Sana, The effects of green house gas costs on optimal pricing and production lotsize in an imperfect production system. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 57 (2023) 2209–2230. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Haverkort and A. Verhagen, Climate change and its repercussions for the potato supply chain. Potato Res. 51 (2008) 223–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.-S. Song, C.A. Yano and P. Lerssrisuriya, Contract assembly: dealing with combined supply lead time and demand quantity uncertainty. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 2 (2000) 287–296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.-S. Song and D.D. Yao, Performance analysis and optimization of assemble-to-order systems with random lead times. Oper. Res. 50 (2002) 889–903. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • G.A. De Croix, J.-S. Song and P.H. Zipkin, Managing an assemble-to-order system with returns. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 11 (2009) 144–159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Jiang and Y. Wang, Supplier competition in decentralized assembly systems with price-sensitive and uncertain demand. Manuf. Ser. Oper. Manage. 12 (2010) 93–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Chen, J. Li and X. Jin, The replenishment policy of agri-products with stochastic demand in integrated agricultural supply chains. Expert Syst. App. 48 (2016) 55–66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Yang, D. Zhang and H. Wang, Research on benefit sharing in contract farming cooperation – an analysis based on price fluctuation and default risk of agricultural products. Price Theory Pract. 10 (2019) 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  • S.S. Sana, Sale through dual channel retailing system – a mathematical approach. Sustainability Anal. Model. 2 (2022) 100008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Gurnani and Y. Gerchak, Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176 (2007) 1559–1576. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Ye and J. Wang, Research on the negotiation model of “company+farmers” type order agriculture supply chain under output uncertainty. Oper. Res. Manage. 26 (2017) 82–91. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Zhou, Research on government subsidy mechanism in “enterprise+farmers” guaranteed price contract under output uncertainty (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • H. Liu, Research on agricultural insurance and government subsidy mechanism under agricultural supply chain (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Cao, Z. Dai and K. Wu, Research on pro-poor financing strategies for agricultural supply chains under output stochasticity. Oper. Res. Manage. 31 (2022) 131–138. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Inderfurth and S. Vogelgesang, Concepts for safety stock determination under stochastic demand and different types of random production yield. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 224 (2013) 293–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Qin and T. Li, Research on order agriculture supply chain under multiple uncertainties. Econ. Issues 2 (2016) 111–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen, The impact of different interest linkages on supply chain operation of contract farming under stochastic output and demand (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Gokarn and T.S. Kuthambalayan, Creating sustainable fresh produce supply chains by managing uncertainties. J. Cleaner Prod. 207 (2019) 908–919. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Wang and D.-B. Tsao, Supply contract with bidirectional options: the buyer’s perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 101 (2006) 30–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Gomez Padilla and T. Mishina, Supply contract with options. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 122 (2009) 312–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Xu and L. Nozick, Modeling supplier selection and the use of option contracts for global supply chain design. Comput. Oper. Res. 36 (2009) 2786–2800. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Xu, Managing production and procurement through option contracts in supply chains with random yield. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 126 (2010) 306–313. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Ling, X. Guo, Z. Hu and L. Liang, Risk-sharing contract for agricultural supply chain based on stochastic output and stochastic demand. Chin. Manage. Sci. 21 (2013) 50–57. [Google Scholar]
  • S.S. Sana, A structural mathematical model on two echelon supply chain system. Ann. Oper. Res. 315 (2022) 1997–2025. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Jiang and S. Li, Green supply chain game model and revenue sharing contract considering product greenness. Chin. Manage. Sci. 23 (2015) 169–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen, L. Xiong and J. Dong, A closed-loop supply chain coordination mechanism based on mean-CVaR. Chin. Manage. Sci. 25 (2017) 68–77. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Yang, W. Zhu and H. Zhao, Research on supplier-led supply chain finance model. Finan. Res. 12 (2016) 175–190. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Sun and G. Zhao, Research on inventory pledge rate considering supply chain credit level. Chin. Manage. Sci. 23 (2015) 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Jin, W. Yuan, J. Wu, J. Li and Y. Wang, Research on risk control of supply chain finance based on revenue sharing-bidirectional option contract. Chin. Manage. Sci. 28 (2020) 68–78. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Cai, J. Chen, Y. Xiao, X. Xu and G. Yu, Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing. Omega 41 (2013) 752–765. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Cao, Z. Dai and K. Wu, Research on pro-poor financing strategies for agricultural supply chains under output stochasticity. Oper. Res. Manage. 31 (2022) 131–138. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Cai, J. Chen, Y. Xiao and X. Xu, Optimization and coordination of fresh product supply chains with freshness-keeping effort. Prod. Oper. Manage. 19 (2010) 261–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Peng, On the amplifying effects of financial moral hazard in the agricultural supply chain. Finan. Res. (2018) 88–103. [Google Scholar]
  • R.D. Raut, A. Gotmare, B.E. Narkhede, U.H. Govindarajan and S.U. Bokade, Enabling technologies for industry 4.0 manufacturing and supply chain: concepts, current status, and adoption challenges. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 48 (2020) 83–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Sharif, C. Aloui and L. Yarovaya, Covid-19 pandemic, oil prices, stock market, geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty nexus in the us economy: fresh evidence from the wavelet-based approach. Int. Rev. Finan. Anal. 70 (2020) 101496. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Barman, M. Pervin and S.K. Roy, Impacts of green and preservation technology investments on a sustainable EPQ model during covid-19 pandemic. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 2245–2275. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Mondal and S.K. Roy, Multi-objective sustainable opened-and closed-loop supply chain under mixed uncertainty during covid-19 pandemic situation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 159 (2021) 107453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.