Open Access
Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 58, Number 4, July-August 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 2991 - 3018 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024101 | |
Published online | 01 August 2024 |
- R. Adner, J. Chen and F. Zhu, Frenemies in platform markets: heterogeneous profit foci as drivers of compatibility decisions. Manage. Sci. 66 (2020) 2432–2451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Armstrong, Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econ. 37 (2006) 668–691. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Avinadav, T. Chernonog, I. Meilijson and Y. Perlman, A consignment contract with revenue sharing between an app developer and a distribution platform. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 243 (2022) 108322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Bai and C.S. Tang, Can two competing on-demand service platforms be profitable? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 250 (2022) 108672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Bakos and H. Halaburda, Platform competition with multihoming on both sides: subsidize or not? Manage. Sci. 66 (2020) 5599–5607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G.P. Cachon, K.M. Daniels and R. Lobel, The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. M&SOM-Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 19 (2017) 368–384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Cao, Y. Su, Y. Xu and J. Wang, Optimal channel selection of remanufacturing firms with considering asymmetric information in platform economy. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 1259–1281. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Chen, Platform coopetition and strategies of third-party complementors: evidence from an e-commerce market, in Academy of Management Proceedings. Vol. 2021. Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY (2021) 14577. [Google Scholar]
- H.K. Cheng and Q.C. Tang, Free trial or no free trial: optimal software product design with network effects. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 205 (2010) 437–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Cheng, W. Ma and H. Ke, Store-brand introduction and production arrangement in the presence of multiple retailers. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 54 (2020) 827–843. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- M.C. Cohen and R. Zhang, Competition and coopetition for twosided platforms. Prod. Oper. Manage. 31 (2022) 1997–2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Dhebar and S.S. Oren, Optimal dynamic pricing for expanding networks. Mark. Sci. 4 (1985) 336–351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Dou and D.J. Wu, Platform competition under network effects: piggybacking and optimal subsidization. Inf. Syst. Res. 32 (2021) 820–835. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Dou, P. He and X. Xu, One-side value-added service investment and pricing strategies for a two-sided platform. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54 (2016) 3808–3821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Eisenmann, G. Parker and M. Van Alstyne, Platform envelopment. Strategic Manage. J. 32 (2011) 1270–1285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Fan, Z. Yin and Y. Liu, The value of horizontal cooperation in online retail channels. Electron. Commer. Res. App. 39 (2020) 100897. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Farrell and G. Saloner, Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econ. 16 (1985) 70–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Hashemi, E. Teimoury and F. Barzinpour, Short lifetime product supply chain coordination and social benefit considering cannibalization effect and market segmentation. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 1781–1805. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- X. He, X. Zheng, D. Chen and J. Wang, The fourth party service platform and service charging, in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Web Services. IEEE (2009, July) 1039–1040. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Huang, W. Zhang and B. Liu, Strategic introduction of private brand in the online retail platform. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 57 (2023) 1377–1396. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- J. Hyun, Competition in two-sided platform markets with direct network effect. Seoul J. Econ. 29 (2016) 331–377. [Google Scholar]
- K.M. Iacocca and S. Mahar, Cooperative partnerships and pricing in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 1724–1740. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Jalali, A. Ansaripoor, V. Ramani and P. De Giovanni, Closed-loop supply chain models with coopetition options. Int. J. Prod. Res. 60 (2022) 3078–3106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Jiang and M. Huang, A multilateral fair negotiation embedded matching method under the fourth party logistics, in 2019 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). IEEE (2019, June) 4298–4302. [Google Scholar]
- M. Katz and C. Shapiro, Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am. Econ. Rev. 75 (1985) 424–440. [Google Scholar]
- A. Kostis, Intra-platform coopetition: an approach to understanding platform dynamics. Acad. Manage. Global Proc. 2018 (2018) 80. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Li and A. Agarwal, Platform integration and demand spillovers in complementary markets: evidence from Facebook’s integration of Instagram. Manage. Sci. 63 (2017) 3438–3458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Li, J. Ma and Y. Liu, Study on the complexity of channel pricing game in showrooming O2O supply chain. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 3373–3392. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- J. Li, F. Hu, T. Yan, X. Cai and X. Song, How to charge doctors and price medicines in a two-sided online healthcare platform with network externalities? Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (2023) 3052–3070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Liang, W. Liu, K.W. Li, C. Dong and M.K. Lim, A co-opetitive game analysis of platform compatibility strategies under add-on services. Prod. Oper. Manage. 32 (2023) 3541–3558. [Google Scholar]
- S. Lin, Two-sided price discrimination by media platforms. Mark. Sci. 39 (2020) 317–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Lin, Y.W. Zhou, W. Xie, Y. Zhong and B. Cao, Pricing and product-bundling strategies for e-commerce platforms with competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 283 (2020) 1026–1039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Liu, X. Guo, Y. Yu and L. Tian, Manufacturer’s contract choice facing competing downstream online retail platforms. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59 (2021) 3017–3041. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Parakhonyak and N. Vikander, Optimal sales schemes for network goods. Manage. Sci. 65 (2019) 819–841. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Parker and M. Van Alstyne, Innovation, openness, and platform control. Manage. Sci. 64 (2018) 3015–3032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Pi, W. Fang and B. Zhang, Service and pricing strategies with competition and cooperation in a dual-channel supply chain with demand disruption. Comput. Ind. Eng. 138 (2019) 106130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Reisinger, J. Schmidt and N. Stieglitz, How complementors benefit from taking competition to the system level. Manage. Sci. 67 (2021) 5106–5123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Shen, X. Yang and Y. Dai, Manufacturer-retail platform interactions in the presence of a weak retailer. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 2732–2754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Sun, Z. Wang and X. Han, Supply chain channel strategies for online retailers: Whether to introduce web showrooms? Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 144 (2020) 102122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T.A. Taylor, On-demand service platforms. M&SOM-Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 20 (2018) 704–720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Wang and G. Lyu, Sequential product positioning on a platform in the presence of network effects. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 229 (2020) 107779. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Wang, M. Huang, W.H. Ip and X. Wang, Network design for maximizing service satisfaction of suppliers and customers under limited budget for industry innovator fourth-party logistics. Comput. Ind. Eng. 158 (2021) 107404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.H. Wu, Licensing to a competitor and strategic royalty choice in a dynamic duopoly. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 279 (2019) 840–853. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Wu, G. Bi, Y. Xu and X. Dang, Channel structure of e-platform encroachment. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 57 (2023) 157–181. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- J. Xie, W. Zhu, L. Wei and L. Liang, Platform competition with partial multi-homing: when both same-side and cross-side network effects exist. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 233 (2021) 108016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Xu, Z. Yao and P. Tang, Pricing strategies for information products with network effects and complementary services in a duopolistic market. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56 (2018) 4243–4263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Xu, G. Lin and X. Zhu, Nash-stackelberg game perspective on pricing strategies for ride-hailing and aggregation platforms under bundle mode. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 13 (2022) 309–318. [Google Scholar]
- X. Xu, M. Zhang, G. Dou and Y. Yu, Coordination of a supply chain with an online platform considering green technology in the blockchain era. Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (2023) 3793–3810. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. Yan and F. Ye, Manufacturer’s channel selection in a capital-constrained supply chain under bargaining game. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) S2161–S2179. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- J. Yu, Research on framework of fourth party logistics information platform based on web services. Appl. Mech. Mater. 20 (2010) 167–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Zhang, Q. Cao and X. He, Contract and product quality in platform selling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 272 (2019) 928–944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Zhang, P. Li and N. Wang, Multi-period price competition of blockchain-technology-supported and traditional platforms under network effect. Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (2023) 3829–3843. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Zhao and R. Hou, Should a supplier engage in the marketplace? An equilibrium analysis in a hybrid-format supply chain. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 2639–2655. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- X. Zhou, K. Chen, H. Wen, J. Lin, K. Zhang, X. Tian, S. Wang and B. Lev, Integration of third-party platforms: Does it really hurt them? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 234 (2021) 108003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Zhu and M. Iansiti, Why Some Platforms Thrives... and Others Don’t What Alibaba, Tencent, and Uber teach us about networks that flourish. The five characteristcs that make the difference. Harvard Bus. Rev. 97 (2019) 118–125. [Google Scholar]
- F. Zhu and Q. Liu, Competing with complementors: an empirical look at Amazon.Com. Strategic Manage. J. 39 (2018) 2618–2642. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.