Open Access
Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 59, Number 2, March-April 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 1173 - 1198 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2025026 | |
Published online | 25 April 2025 |
- Q. Bai, M. Chen, Y. Nikolaidis and J. Xu, Improving sustainability and social responsibility of a two-tier supply chain investing in emission reduction technology. Appl. Math. Model. 95 (2021) 688–714. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- G. Bressanelli, M. Perona and N. Saccani, Challenges in supply chain redesign for the Circular Economy: a literature review and a multiple case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 7395–7422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. Chen, J. Cai and K. Govindan, Decision analysis of supply chain considering yield uncertainty and CSR under different market power structures. J. Clean. Prod. 434 (2024) 139006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Cheng and H. Ding, Dynamic game of corporate social responsibility in a supply chain with competition. J. Clean. Prod. 317 (2021) 128398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Cheng, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang and Q. Zhang, Impacts of CSR implementation and channel leadership in a socially responsible supply chain. Kybernetes 52 (2023) 4197–4228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Cheng, J. Pan and Y. Gong, Who will undertake corporate social responsibility in supply chain encroachment? Manufacturer or retailer. Manage. Decis. Econ. 45 (2024) 1511–1527. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T.M. Choi, L. Feng and Y. Li, Ethical fashion supply chain operations: product development and moral hazards. Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (2023) 1058–1075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Govindarajan, B. Lev, A. Srivastava and L. Enache, The gap between large and small companies is growing. Why. Harvard Bus. Rev. 16 (2019) 16–20. [Google Scholar]
- A.Y. Ha, W. Shang and Y. Wang, Manufacturer rebate competition in a supply chain with a common retailer. Prod. Oper. Manage. 26 (2017) 2122–2136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.F. Hsueh, Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 151 (2014) 214–222. [Google Scholar]
- W.T. Huh and H. Li, Product-line pricing with dual objective of profit and consumer surplus. Prod. Oper. Manage. 32 (2023) 1223–1242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.W. Jacobs and R. Subramanian, Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Prod. Oper. Manage. 21 (2012) 85–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.K. Jena and D. Singhal, Optimizing the competitive sustainable process and pricing decision of digital supply chain: a power-balance perspective. Comput. Ind. Eng. 177 (2023) 109054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Johari, S.M. Hosseini-Motlagh and M. Rasti-Barzoki, An evolutionary game theoretic model for analyzing pricing strategy and socially concerned behavior of manufacturers. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 128 (2019) 506–525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Khosroshahi, S. Dimitrov and S.R. Hejazi, Pricing, greening, and transparency decisions considering the impact of government subsidies and CSR behavior in supply chain decisions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 60 (2021) 102485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H.Y. Lee, D.W. Kwak and J.Y. Park, Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of small and medium-sized enterprises. Corporate Soc. Respons. Environ. Manage. 24 (2017) 634–647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Li, R. Zhang, S. Zhao and B. Liu, Low carbon strategy analysis under revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contracts. J. Clean. Prod. 212 (2019) 1462–1477. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Li, R. Zhang and B. Liu, Advertising and power structures in competing supply chains. Comput. Ind. Eng. 150 (2020) 106917. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Li, N. Li, T.M. Choi and S. Sethi, Is CSR Engagement Rewarded Equally Across Supply Chain Positions? Evidence from COVID-19. Evidence from COVID-19. Available at SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4158823 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- S. Liu, F. Yao and D. Chen, CSR investment decision and coordination strategy for closed-loop supply chain with two competing retailers. J. Clean. Prod. 310 (2021) 127378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Liu, W. Ren, Q. Xu and Z.Y. Liu, Decision analysis of supply chains considering corporate social responsibility and government subsidy under different channel power structures. Ann. Oper. Res. 315 (2022) 1841–1869. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- T.W. McGuire and R. Staelin, An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Market. Sci. 27 (1983) 115–130. [Google Scholar]
- N.M. Modak and P. Kelle, Using social work donation as a tool of corporate social responsibility in a closed-loop supply chain considering carbon emissions tax and demand uncertainty. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72 (2021) 61–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N.M. Modak, S. Panda and S.S. Sana, Pricing policy and coordination for a two-layer supply chain of duopolistic retailers and socially responsible manufacturer. Int. J. Logistics Res. App. 19 (2016) 487–508. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N.M. Modak, N. Kazemi and L.E. Cardenas-Barron, Investigating structure of a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain using social work donation as a Corporate Social Responsibility practice. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 207 (2019) 19–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Panda, Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 67 (2014) 92–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Panda, N.M. Modak and D. Pradhan, Corporate social responsibility, channel coordination and profit division in a two-echelon supply chain. Int. J. Manage. Sci. Eng. Manage. 11 (2016) 22–33. [Google Scholar]
- S. Panda, N.M. Modak and L.E. Cardenas-Barron, Coordinating a socially responsible closed-loop supply chain with product recycling. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 188 (2017) 11–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.A. Raza, Supply chain coordination under a revenue-sharing contract with corporate social responsibility and partial demand information. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 205 (2018) 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.M. Seyedhosseini, S.M. Hosseini-Motlagh, M. Johari and M. Jazinaninejad, Social price-sensitivity of demand for competitive supply chain coordination. Comput. Ind. Eng. 135 (2019) 1103–1126. [Google Scholar]
- B. Shen, C. Dong and S. Minner, Combating copycats in the supply chain with permissioned blockchain technology. Prod. Oper. Manage. 31 (2022) 138–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Shi, H.L. Chan and C. Dong, Impacts of competition between buying firms on corporate social responsibility efforts: Does competition do more harm than good? Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 140 (2020) 101985. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Wang, M. Wang and W. Liu, To introduce competition or not to introduce competition: an analysis of corporate social responsibility investment collaboration in a two-echelon supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 133 (2020) 101812. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Wang, M. Su, L. Shen and R. Tang, Decision-making of closed-loop supply chain under Corporate Social Responsibility and fairness concerns. J. Clean. Prod. 284 (2021) 125373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Younis and B. Sundarakani, The impact of firm size, firm age and environmental management certification on the relationship between green supply chain practices and corporate performance. Benchmarking Int. J. 27 (2020) 319–346. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Zhang, H. Xu, Z. Liu and Y. Fang, Implications for pure profit, environmental impact and social welfare in a socially responsible supply chain. Kybernetes 50 (2021) 757–784. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Zhao and R. Yin, Coordination of a socially responsible two-stage supply chain under price-dependent random demand. 4OR 16 (2018) 379–400. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- H. Zhu, T. Li, J. Tang and W. Huang, Corporate social responsibility strategies in competition and their implications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 265 (2023) 108955. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.