Open Access
| Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 59, Number 2, March-April 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 803 - 833 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2025010 | |
| Published online | 14 March 2025 | |
- M.A. Abo-sinna, Pareto optimality for bi-level programming problem with fuzzy parameters. Opsearch 38 (2001) 372–393. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- M.A. Abo-Sinna and I.A. Baky, Interactive balance space approach for solving multi-level multi-objective programming problems. Inf. Sci. 177 (2007) 3397–3410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, A.T. Soliman and M. Abdollahian, Solving multi-level multiobjective fractional programming problem with rough interval parameter in neutrosophic environment. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 2567–2581. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- N. Aydin and Z. Cetinkale, Analyses on ICU and non-ICU capacity of government hospitals during the COVID-19 outbreak via multi-objective linear programming: an evidence from Istanbul. Comput. Biol. Med. 146 (2022) 105562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Babaee Tirkolaee, H. Golpîra, A. Javanmardan and R. Maihami, A socio-economic optimization model for blood supply chain network design during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interactive possibilistic programming approach for a real case study. Soc.-Econ. Planning Sci. 85 (2023) 101439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I.A. Baky, Fuzzy goal programming algorithm for solving decentralized bi-level multi-objective programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160 (2009) 2701–2713. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I.A. Baky, Solving multi-level multi-objective linear programming problems through fuzzy goal programming approach. Appl. Math. Modell. 34 (2010) 2377–2387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I.A. Baky, M.H. Eid and M.A. El Sayed, Bi-level multi-objective programming problem with fuzzy demands: a fuzzy goal programming algorithm. Opsearch 51 (2014) 280–296. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- O. Ben-Ayed, Bilevel linear programming. Comput. Oper. Res. 20 (1993) 485–501. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- J. Bracken and J.T. McGill, Mathematical programs with optimization problems in the constraints. Oper. Res. 21 (1973) 37–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Bracken and J.T. McGill, Technical note – a method for solving mathematical programs with nonlinear programs in the constraints. Oper. Res. 22 (1974) 917–1133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Colson, P. Marcotte and G. Savard, Bilevel programming: a survey. 4OR 3 (2005) 87–107. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- R. Gabasov and F.M. Kirillova, Linear Programming Methods. House, Minsk (1978). [Google Scholar]
- R. Gabasov and F.M. Kirillova, New linear programming methods and their application to optimal control. IFAC Proc. Vol. 12 (1979) 17–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Gabasov, F.M. Kirillova and S.V. Prischepova, Optimal Feedback Control. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1995). [Google Scholar]
- M. Kaci and S. Radjef, The set of all the possible compromises of a multi-level multi-objective linear programming problem. Croatian Oper. Res. Rev. 13 (2022) 13–30. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- M. Kaci and S. Radjef, An adaptive method to solve multilevel multiobjective linear programming problems. Oper. Res. Decisions 33 (2023) 29–44. [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Kalashnikov, S. Dempe, G.A. Pérez-Valdés, N.I. Kalashnykova and J.F. Camacho-Vallejo, Bilevel programming and applications. Math. Prob. Eng. 2015 (2015) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- K. Lachhwani, On solving multi-level multi objective linear programming problems through fuzzy goal programming approach. Opsearch 51 (2014) 624–637. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- K. Lachhwani, Solving the general fully neutrosophic multi-level multiobjective linear programming problems. Opsearch 58 (2021) 1192–1216. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- A. Miniguano-Trujillo, F. Salazar, R. Torres, P. Arias and K. Sotomayor, An integer programming model to assign patients based on mental health impact for tele-psychotherapy intervention during the COVID-19 emergency. Health Care Manag. Sci. 24 (2021) 286–304. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D. Mollalign, A. Mushi and B. Guta, Solving multiobjective multilevel programming problems using two-phase intuitionistic fuzzy goal programming method. J. Comput. Sci. 63 (2022) 1877–7503. [Google Scholar]
- S. Nayak and A. Ojha, On multi-level multi-objective linear fractional programming problem with interval parameters. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 53 (2019) 1601–1616. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- S. Pardeshi, S. Gawade and P. Hemant, Student learning time analysis during COVID-19 using linear programming – simplex method. Soc. Sci. Human. Open 5 (2022) 100266. [Google Scholar]
- C.O. Pieume, P. Marcotte, L.P. Fotso and P. Siarry, Solving bilevel linear multiobjective programming problems. Am. J. Oper. Res. 01 (2011) 214–219. [Google Scholar]
- M. Sakawa and I. Nishizaki, Interactive fuzzy programming for multi-level programming problems: a review. Int. J. Multicriteria Decis. Making 2 (2012) 241–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Sinha, Fuzzy programming approach to multi-level programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 136 (2003) 189–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.B. Sinha and S. Sinha, A linear programming approach for linear multi-level programming problems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55 (2004) 312–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Tavana, K. Govindan, A.K. Nasr, M.S. Heidary and H. Mina, A mathematical programming approach for equitable COVID-19 vaccine distribution in developing countries. Ann. Oper. Res. (2021). [Google Scholar]
- L. Vicente and P. Calamai, Bilevel and multilevel programming: a bibliography review. J. Global Optim. 5 (1994) 291–306. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.