Open Access
| Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 59, Number 3, May-June 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 1363 - 1378 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2025033 | |
| Published online | 14 May 2025 | |
- Q. An, K. Zhu, B. Xiong and Z. Shen, Carbon resource reallocation with emission quota in carbon emission trading system. J. Environ. Manage. 327 (2023) 116837. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Andersen and N.C. Petersen, A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 39 (1993) 1261–1264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Asanimoghadam, M. Salahi, A. Jamalian and R. Shakouri, A two-stage structure with undesirable outputs: slacks-based and additive slacks-based measures DEA models. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 2513–2534. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- R.D. Banker, A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30 (1984) 1078–1092. [Google Scholar]
- P. Bogetoft, DEA on relaxed convexity assumptions. Manage. Sci. 42 (1996) 457–465. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Bogetoft, J.M. Tama and J. Tind, Convex input and output projections of nonconvex production possibility sets. Manage. Sci. 46 (2000) 858–869. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Cesaroni, K. Kerstens and I. Van de Woestyne, Global and local scale characteristics in convex and nonconvex nonparametric technologies: a first empirical exploration. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 259 (2017) 576–586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. [Google Scholar]
- L. Chen, Y.M. Wang and F. Lai, Semi-disposability of undesirable outputs in data envelopment analysis for environmental assessments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 260 (2017) 655–664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Chen, F. M. Wu, Y. M. Wang and M. J. Li, Analysis of the environmental efficiency in China based on the DEA cross-efficiency approach under different policy objectives. Expert Syst. 37 (2020) e12461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Chen, X.C. Yuan, X. Zhang and Y. Cao, How will the Chinese national carbon emissions trading scheme work? The assessment of regional potential gains. Energy Pol. 137 (2020) 111095. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y.H. Chung, R. F¨are and S. Grosskopf, Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J. Environ. Manage. 51 (1997) 229–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. Cui and Y. Li, Airline dynamic efficiency measures with a dynamic RAM with unified natural & managerial disposability. Energy Econ. 75 (2018) 534–546. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Deprins, L. Simar and H. Tulkens, Measuring labor-efficiency in post offices, in Public Goods, Environmental Externalities and Fiscal Competition. Springer US, Boston, MA (2006) 285–309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Dong, Y. Geng, F. Xi and T. Fujita, Carbon footprint evaluation at industrial park level: a hybrid life cycle assessment approach. Energy Pol. 57 (2013) 298–307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Du, J. Wang, Y. Chen, S.Y. Chou and J. Zhu, Incorporating health outcomes in Pennsylvania hospital efficiency: an additive super-efficiency DEA approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 221 (2014) 161–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Ertay, The most cost efficient automotive vendor with price uncertainty: a new DEA approach. Measurement 52 (2014) 135–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Fan, B. Bai, Q. Qiao, P. Kang, Y. Zhang and J. Guo, Study on eco-efficiency of industrial parks in China based on data envelopment analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 192 (2017) 107–115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Geng and Z. Hengxin, Industrial park management in the Chinese environment. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009) 1289–1294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Goodarzian, H. Hoseini-Nasab, M. Toloo and M.B. Fakhrzad, Designing a new medicine supply chain network considering production technology policy using two novel heuristic algorithms. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 1015–1042. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- M. Izadikhah, M. Azadi, M. Toloo and F. K. Hussain, Sustainably resilient supply chains evaluation in public transport: A fuzzy chance-constrained two-stage DEA approach. Appl. Soft Comput. 113 (2021) 107879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Izadikhah, E. Azadi, M. Azadi, R. Farzipoor Saen and M. Toloo, Developing a new chance constrained NDEA model to measure performance of sustainable supply chains. Ann. Oper. Res. 316 (2022) 1319–1347. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- A. Kalhor and R.K. Matin, Performance evaluation of general network production processes with undesirable outputs: A DEA approach. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 52 (2018) 17–34. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- G. Katharakis, M. Katharaki and T. Katostaras, An empirical study of comparing DEA and SFA methods to measure hospital units’ efficiency. Int. J. Oper. Res. 21 (2014) 341–364. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Kerstens and I. Van de Woestyne, Enumeration algorithms for FDH directional distance functions under different returns to scale assumptions. Ann. Oper. Res. 271 (2018) 1067–1078. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- K. Kerstens, J. Sadeghi, M. Toloo and I. Van de Woestyne, Procedures for ranking technical and cost efficient units: with a focus on nonconvexity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 300 (2022) 269–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Kuosmanen, DEA with efficiency classification preserving conditional convexity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132 (2001) 326–342. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H.W. Lampe and D. Hilgers, Trajectories of efficiency measurement: a bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240 (2015) 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- H.S. Lee and J. Zhu, Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216 (2012) 429–433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.K. Li, A nonparametric test of quasiconcave production function with variable returns to scale. J. Math. Econ. 82 (2019) 160–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Mahmoudi, A. Emrouznejad, S.N. Shetab-Boushehri and S.R. Hejazi, The origins, development and future directions of data envelopment analysis approach in transportation systems. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 69 (2020) 100672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Omrani, K. Shafaat and A. Alizadeh, Integrated data envelopment analysis and cooperative game for evaluating energy efficiency of transportation sector: a case of Iran. Ann. Oper. Res. 274 (2019) 471–499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N.C. Petersen, Data envelopment analysis on a relaxed set of assumptions. Manage. Sci. 36 (1990) 305–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Podinovski and T. Kuosmanen, Modelling weak disposability in data envelopment analysis under relaxed convexity assumptions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211 (2011) 577–585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Post, Estimating nonconvex production sets–imposing convex input sets and output sets in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 131 (2001) 132–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Post, Transconcave data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132 (2001) 374–389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Ren, Z. Zhou and H. Xiao, Estimation of portfolio efficiency considering social responsibility: evidence from the multi-horizon diversification DEA. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 611–637. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- M. Salahi, M. Toloo and Z. Hesabirad, Robust Russell and enhanced Russell measures in DEA. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 70 (2019) 1275–1283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Salahi, M. Toloo and N. Torabi, A new robust optimization approach to common weights formulation in DEA. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72 (2021) 1390–1402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Schmidheiny, Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment. Vol. 1. MIT Press (1992). [Google Scholar]
- T. Sueyoshi and M. Goto, Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries. Energy Econ. 34 (2012) 686–699. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Sueyoshi and Y. Yuan, China’s regional sustainability and diversified resource allocation: DEA environmental assessment on economic development and air pollution. Energy Econ. 49 (2015) 239–256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Sueyoshi, Y. Yuan, A. Li and D. Wang, Social sustainability of provinces in China: a data envelopment analysis (DEA) window analysis under the concepts of natural and managerial disposability. Sustain Sci. 9 (2017) 2078. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Tao, Q. An, B. Xiong, Y. Chen and M. Goh, Benchmarking with nonconvex production possibility set through data envelopment analysis: an application to China’s transportation system. Expert. Syst. Appl. 198 (2022) 116872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Toloo, A cost efficiency approach for strategic vendor selection problem under certain input prices assumption. Measurement 85 (2016) 175–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Toloo and M. Mirbolouki, A new project selection method using data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 138 (2019) 106119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Toloo, E.K. Mensah and M. Salahi, Robust optimization and its duality in data envelopment analysis. Omega 108 (2021) 102583. [Google Scholar]
- K. Tone, A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130 (2001) 498–509. [Google Scholar]
- L. Tong, X. Liu, X. Liu, Z. Yuan and Q. Zhang, Life cycle assessment of water reuse systems in an industrial park. J. Environ. Manage. 129 (2013) 471–478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Tulkens, On FDH efficiency analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit. J. Prod. Anal. 4 (1993) 183–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Wu, Y. Chen, P. Zhao, J. Guo and Z. Ma, Study of haze emission efficiency based on new co-opetition data envelopment analysis. Expert Syst. 37 (2020) e12466. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- H. Xiao, Z. Zhou, T. Ren and W. Liu, Estimation of portfolio efficiency in nonconvex settings: a free disposal hull estimator with non-increasing returns to scale. Omega. 111 (2022) 102672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Xiao, X. Liu, T. Ren and Z. Zhou, Estimation of portfolio efficiency via stochastic DEA. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 2367–2387. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- H. Xiao, N. Wang and S. Wang, Dynamic sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation in China: evidence from both novel nonconvex global two-stage DEA and Malmquist productivity index. Oper. Res. 23 (2023) 27. [Google Scholar]
- B. Zhang, J. Bi, Z. Fan, Z. Yuan and J. Ge, Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecol Econ. 68 (2008) 306–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.