EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 59 / No 4 (July-August 2025) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 59 4 (2025) 2303-2324 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 59, Number 4, July-August 2025
Page(s) 2303 - 2324
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2025091
Published online 05 September 2025
  • Q. An, P. Wang, A. Emrouznejad and J. Hu, Fixed cost allocation based on the principle of efficiency invariance in two-stage systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 283 (2020) 662–675. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. An, P. Wang and S. Shi, Fixed cost allocation for two-stage systems with cooperative relationship using data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 145 (2020) 106534. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.D. Banker, A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 30 (1984) 1078–1092. [Google Scholar]
  • J.E. Beasley, Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147 (2003) 198–216. [Google Scholar]
  • R.G. Chambers, Y. Chung and R. F¨are, Benefit and distance functions. J. Econ. Theor. 70 (1996) 407–419. [Google Scholar]
  • T.S. Chang, J.G. Lin and J. Ouenniche, DEA-based nash bargaining approach to merger target selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 305 (2023) 930–945. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Programming with linear fractional functionals. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 9 (1962) 181–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Chen and Y. Wang, DEA target setting approach within the cross efficiency framework. Omega 96 (2020) 102072. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chu, J. Wu, C. Chu and T. Zhang, DEA-based fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems: leader–follower and satisfaction degree bargaining game approaches. Omega 94 (2020) 102054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W.D. Cook and M. Kress, Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: a DEA approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 119 (1999) 652–661. [Google Scholar]
  • W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a DEA approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 32 (2005) 2171–2178. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Ding, Y. Chen, H. Wu and Y. Wei, Centralized fixed cost and resource allocation considering technology heterogeneity: a DEA approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 268 (2018) 497–511. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Djordjević, R. Maitra and B. Ghosh, Environmental efficiency assessment of dublin port using two-stage non-radial DEA model. Maritime Transp. Res. 4 (2023) 100078. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Du, W.D. Cook, L. Liang and J. Zhu, Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235 (2014) 206–214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. F¨are, S. Grosskopf and P. Roos, Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 39 (1995) 137–144. [Google Scholar]
  • M.R. Ghasemi, J. Ignatius, S. Lozano, A. Emrouznejad and A. Hatami-Marbini, A fuzzy expected value approach under generalized data envelopment analysis. Knowl. Based Syst. 89 (2015) 148–159. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Ghiyasi, M. Soltanifar and H. Sharafi, A novel inverse DEA-R model with application in hospital efficiency. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 84 (2022) 101427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Golany and E. Tamir, Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-offs: a data envelopment analysis approach. Manag. Sci. 41 (1995) 1172–1184. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hatami-Marbini, Z.G. Beigi, H. Fukuyama and K. Gholami, Modeling centralized resources allocation and target setting in imprecise data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Dec. Making 14 (2015) 1189–1213. [Google Scholar]
  • L.F. Hosseinzadeh, N. Nematollahi, M.H. Behzadi, M. Mirbolouki and Z. Moghaddas, Centralized resource allocation with stochastic data. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236 (2012) 1783–1788. [Google Scholar]
  • G.R. Jahanshahloo, F.H. Lotfi, N. Shoja and M. Sanei, An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using DEA. Appl. Math. Comput. 153 (2004) 267–274. [Google Scholar]
  • G.R. Jahanshahloo, J. Sadeghi and M. Khodabakhshi, Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 85 (2017) 223–240. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Li, M. Yang, Y. Chen, Q. Dai and L. Liang, Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree. Omega 41 (2013) 55–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Li, J. Song, A. Dolgui and L. Liang, Using common weights and efficiency invariance principles for resource allocation and target setting. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55 (2017) 4982–4997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Li, Q. Zhu and L. Liang, Allocating a fixed cost based on a DEA-game cross efficiency approach. Exp. Syst. Appl. 96 (2018) 196–207. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Li, Q. Zhu and Z. Chen, Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures. Omega 83 (2019) 139–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Li, L. Lin, Q. Dai and L. Zhang, Allocating common costs of multinational companies based on arm’s length principle and nash non-cooperative game. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 283 (2020) 1002–1010. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Li, X. Ji and B. Zhang, Allocation of carbon emission permits in heterogeneous complex network systems: a DEA-based study among China’s industrial sectors. Comput. Ind. Eng. 174 (2022) 108836. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Lin, Allocating fixed costs or resources and setting targets via data envelopment analysis. Appl. Math. Comput. 217 (2011) 6349–6358. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Liu and Y.K. Liu, Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10 (2002) 445–450. [Google Scholar]
  • F.H. Lotfi, G.R. Jahanshahloo, T. Allahviranloo, E. Noroozi and A.H. Lotfi, Equitable allocation of shared costs on fuzzy environment. Int. Math. Forum 2 (2007) 3199–3210. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Malekmohammadi, F.H. Lotfi and A.B. Jaafar, Centralized resource allocation in DEA with interval data: an application to commercial banks in Malaysia. Int. J. Math. Anal. 3 (2009) 757–764. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Malekmohammadi, F.H. Lotfi and A.B. Jaafar, Data envelopment scenario analysis with imprecise data. Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. 19 (2011) 65–79. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Momeni, F.H. Lotfi, R.F. Saen and E. Najafi, Centralized DEA-based reallocation of emission permits under cap and trade regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 234 (2019) 306–314. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Omrani, M. Shamsi, A. Emrouznejad and T. Teplova, A robust DEA model under discrete scenarios for assessing bank branches. Exp. Syst. Appl. 219 (2023) 119694. [Google Scholar]
  • J.T. Pastor, J.L. Ruiz and I. Sirvent, An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 115 (1999) 596–607. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Sadeghi and A. Dehnokhalaji, A comprehensive method for the centralized resource allocation in DEA. Comput. Ind. Eng. 127 (2019) 344–352. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Sarah and K. Khalili-Damghani, Fuzzy Type-II De-Novo programming for resource allocation and target setting in network data envelopment analysis: a natural gas supply chain. Exp. Syst. Appl. 117 (2019) 312–329. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Si, L. Liang, G. Jia, L. Yang, H. Wu and Y. Li, Proportional sharing and DEA in allocating the fixed cost. Appl. Math. Comput. 219 (2013) 6580–6590. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Sueyoshi and M. Goto, DEA environmental assessment in a time horizon: Malmquist index on fuel mix, electricity and CO2 of industrial nations. Energy Econ. 40 (2013) 370–382. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Tone, A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130 (2001) 498–509. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang and K.S. Chin, Fuzzy data envelopment analysis: a fuzzy expected value approach. Exp. Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 11678–11685. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang and D. Zhu, Ordinal proportional cost sharing. J. Math. Econ. 37 (2002) 215–230. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Wei, S. Zhang, T. Liu and B. Sun, The adjusted passenger transportation efficiency of nine airports in china with consideration of the impact of high-speed rail network development: a two-step DEA-OLS method. J. Air Transp. Manag. 109 (2023) 102395. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Yu and I. Rakshit, Target setting for airlines incorporating CO2 emissions: the DEA bargaining approach. J. Air Transp. Manag. 108 (2023) 102376. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Yu, I. Rakshit and B. Hsiao, A fixed cost allocation based on the two-stage network data envelopment approach. J. Bus. Res. 69 (2016) 1817–1822. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Zhu, C. Zhu and A. Emrouznejad, A combined machine learning algorithms and DEA method for measuring and predicting the efficiency of chinese manufacturing listed companies. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 6 (2021) 435–448. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.