Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 60, Number 1, January-February 2026
Page(s) 29 - 53
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2025143
Published online 06 February 2026
  • H. Abbas, Funko DTC sales, powered by new website, account for about 17% of net sales (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • Federal Trade Commission (FTC), FTC releases interim staff report on prescription drug middlemen. Technical report, Federal Trade Commission (2024). Interim Staff Report on Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) in the U.S. prescription drug supply chain. [Google Scholar]
  • McKinsey & Company, How COVID-19 is Changing the World of Beauty. McKinsey & Company Articles (2020). Analysis of short-term and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on the global beauty industry (skin care, color cosmetics, hair care, fragrances, personal care). [Google Scholar]
  • Private Label Manufacturers Association, Store brands facts (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • B. Dan, Walmart launches sustainable eyewear brand (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Dana, Amazon has been slashing private-label selection AMID weak sales (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • McKinsey & Company, The state of fashion 2023: holding onto growth as global clouds gather (2023). Annual report on global fashion industry trends, growth challenges, and market outlook. [Google Scholar]
  • Numerator, Private label perceptions: an analysis of the U.S. private label market (2025). Consumer insights and market analysis of private label products in the United States. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Pauwels and S. Srinivasan, Who benefits from store brand entry? Marketing Sci. 23 (2004) 364–390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Groznik and H.S. Heese, Supply chain interactions due to store-brand introductions: the impact of retail competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203 (2010) 575–582. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Ru, R. Shi and J. Zhang, Does a store brand always hurt the manufacturer of a competing national brand? Prod. Oper. Manage. 24 (2015) 272–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Shi, Contract manufacturer’s encroachment strategy and quality decision with different channel leadership structures. Comput. Ind. Eng. 137 (2019) 106078. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Zheng, H. Jang and X.A. Pan, Store-brand introduction and multilateral contracting. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 24 (2022) 467–468. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Mao and Y. Han, Interaction between service investment and store-brand introduction in a dual-channel supply chain. J. Manage. Sci. Eng. 9 (2024) 293–307. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Sun and Y. Ji, For better or for worse: impacts of IoT technology in ecommerce channel. Prod. Oper. Manage. 31 (2022) 1353–1371. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Li, S. Ma and Z. Zhang, Friends or foes? The effect of IoT platform entry into smart device market under quantity discount pricing contract. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 71 (2024) 10984–10997. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Jullien, M. Reisinger and P. Rey, Personalized pricing and distribution strategies. Manage. Sci. 69 (2023) 1687–1702. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chen, H. Zhang and Y. Sun, Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer stackelberg dual-channel supply chain. Omega 40 (2012) 571–583. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Gao, L. Guo and A. Orsdemir, Dual-channel distribution: the case for cost information asymmetry. Prod. Oper. Manage. 30 (2021) 494–521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Xiao, W. Niu, L. Zhang and W. Xue, Store brand introduction in a dual-channel supply chain: the roles of quality differentiation and power structure. Omega 116 (2023) 102802. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Zhang, H. Song, X. Gu, V. Shi and J. Zhu, How to compete with a supply chain partner: retailer’s store brand vs. manufacturer’s encroachment. Omega 103 (2021) 102412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Meng, S. Deng, P. Zhou and H. Xu, The role of dual purpose in retailer’s store brand introduction and quality strategies within a supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 194 (2025) 103912. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Li, C. Yue, S. Ma, X. Ma, F. Gao, Y. Zheng and X. Li, Life cycle assessment of car energy transformation: evidence from China. Ann. Oper. Res. (2023) 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Jiang, L. Tian, Y. Xu and F. Zhang, To share or not to share: demand forecast sharing in a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 35 (2016) 800–809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Cao, X. Guan, T. Fan and L. Zhou, The acquisition of quality information in a supply chain with voluntary vs. mandatory disclosure. Prod. Oper. Manage. 29 (2020) 595–616. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Huang, X. Guan and Y.J. Chen, Retailer information sharing with supplier encroachment. Prod. Oper. Manage. 27 (2018) 1133–1147. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Tang, S.P. Sethi and Y. Wang, Games of supplier encroachment channel selection and e-tailer’s information sharing. Prod. Oper. Manage. 32 (2023) 3650–3664. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Huang, J. Xu and Y. Wang, Quality disclosure in a dual-channel supply chain with an online dual-purpose platform. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 193 (2025) 103834. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Li, Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Manage. Sci. 48 (2002) 1196–1212. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Gal-Or, T. Geylani and A.J. Dukes, Information sharing in a channel with partially informed retailers. Marketing Sci. 27 (2008) 642–658. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zha, Q. Li, T. Huang and Y. Yu, Strategic information sharing of online platforms as resellers or marketplaces. Marketing Sci. 42 (2023) 659–678. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.L. Shi and W. Geng, To introduce a store brand or not: roles of market information in supply chains. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 150 (2021) 102334. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Hsiao, Y.J. Chen, H. Xiong and H. Liu, Incentives for disclosing the store brand supplier. Omega 109 (2022) 102590. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Ma and S. Liu, Information disclosure strategies of live-streaming supply chains in the digi-economy era. Manage. Decis. Econ. 45 (2024) 5696–5713. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Luo, X. Sun and X. Yue, Store brand entry with asymmetric cost information. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 192 (2024) 103790. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Guan, B. Liu, Y. Chen and H. Wang, Inducing supply chain transparency through supplier encroachment. Prod. Oper. Manage. 29 (2020) 725–749. [Google Scholar]
  • A.Y. Ha, H. Luo and W. Shang, Supplier encroachment, information sharing, and channel structure in online retail platforms. Prod. Oper. Manage. 31 (2022) 1235–1251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Shin and A. Zeevi, Product quality and information sharing in the presence of reviews. Manage. Sci. 70 (2023) 1428–1447. [Google Scholar]
  • W.A. Ericson, A note on the posterior mean of a population mean. J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 31 (1969) 332–334. [Google Scholar]
  • A.Y. Ha, S. Tong and H. Zhang, Sharing demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies. Manage. Sci. 57 (2011) 566–581. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Kumar, Private Label Strategy: How to Meet the Store Brand Challenge. Harvard Business Review Press (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • K.L. Ailawadi and K.L. Keller, Understanding retail branding: conceptual insights and research priorities. J. Retail. 80 (2004) 331–342. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Jovanovic, Truthful disclosure of information. Bell J. Econ. 13 (1982) 36–44. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Su and F. Zhang, Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance. Manage. Sci. 54 (2008) 1759–1773. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Zhang, Vertical information exchange in a supply chain with duopoly retailers. Prod. Oper. Manage. 11 (2009) 531–546. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Cao, Y. Wang, J. Zhao and J. Min, Store brand introduction and quantity decision under asymmetric cost information in a retailer-led supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 152 (2021) 106995. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.