EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 2 (March-April 2026) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 60 2 (2026) 1025-1052 References
AFROS2024-OR&AI
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 60, Number 2, March-April 2026
AFROS2024-OR&AI
Page(s) 1025 - 1052
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2026020
Published online 13 April 2026
  • T.K. Shackelford and V.A. Weekes-Shackelford, editors, Cultural Learning. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021) 1674–1676. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Peedicayil, Cultural Inheritance. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018) 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Dargan, M. Kumar, M.R. Ayyagari and G. Kumar, A survey of deep learning and its applications: a new paradigm to machine learning. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 27 (2019) 1071–1092. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Han, M. Kamber and P. Jian, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Slowik, Swarm Intelligence Algorithms: A Tutorial. Taylor & Francis Group (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Chakraborty and A.K. Kar, Swarm intelligence: a review of algorithms, in Nature-Inspired Computing and Optimization. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017) 475–494. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Zhang, C. Xiao and N. Razmjooy, Optimal parameter extraction of PEM fuel cells by meta-heuristics. Int. J. Ambient Energy 43 (2020) 2510–2519. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Mir, M. Dayyani, T. Sutikno, M.M. Zanjireh and N. Razmjooy, Employing a Gaussian particle swarm optimization method for tuning multi input multi output-fuzzy system as an integrated controller of a micro-grid with stability analysis. Comput. Intell. 36 (2019) 225–258. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Razmjooy, M. Ramezani and N. Ghadimi, Imperialist competitive algorithm-based optimization of neuro-fuzzy system parameters for automatic red-eye removal. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19 (2017) 1144–1156. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Razmjooy, M. Khalilpour and M. Ramezani, A new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm inspired by FIFA world cup competitions: theory and its application in PID designing for AVR system. J. Control Autom. Electr. Syst. 27 (2016) 419–440. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Khelfa and I. Khennak, A survey on recent optimization strategies in ambulance dispatching and relocation problems, in Artificial Intelligence Doctoral Symposium. Springer Nature, Singapore (2023) 192–203. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Drias and H. Drias, Fuzzy elephant herding optimization and dbscan for emergency transportation: a case study for the 2023 türkiye earthquake, in Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, edited by C. Kahraman et al. Vol. 1089. Springer, Cham (2024) 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  • N.A. Houacine and H. Drias, When robots contribute to eradicate the COVID-19 spread in a context of containment. Prog. Artif. Intell. 10 (2021) 391–416. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Senanayake, I. Senthooran, J.C. Barca, H. Chung, J. Kamruzzaman and M. Murshed, Search and tracking algorithms for swarms of robots: a survey. Robot. Auton. Syst. 75 (2016) 422–434. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Dadgar, S. Jafari and A. Hamzeh, A PSO-based multi-robot cooperation method for target searching in unknown environments. Neurocomputing 177 (2016) 62–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Yang, R. Xiong, X. Xiang and Y. Shi, Exploration enhanced RPSO for collaborative multitarget searching of robotic swarms. Complexity 2020 (2020) 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • V. Garg, A. Shukla and R. Tiwari, AERPSO an adaptive exploration robotic pso based cooperative algorithm for multiple target searching. Expert Systems with Applications 209 (2022) 118245. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Mottaghi and R. Vaughan, An integrated particle filter and potential field method applied to cooperative multi-robot target tracking. Auton. Robot. 23 (2007) 19–35. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Li et al., Improved artificial potential field-based simultaneous forward search method for robot path planning in complex environment, in 2015 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). IEEE (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • J. Li and Y. Tan, Triangle formation based multiple targets search using a swarm of robots, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016) 544–552. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Li and Y. Tan, A probabilistic finite state machine based strategy for multi-target search using swarm robotics. Appl. Soft Comput. 77 (2019) 467–483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Li and Y. Tan, A two-stage imitation learning framework for the multi-target search problem in swarm robotics. Neurocomputing 334 (2019) 249–264. [Google Scholar]
  • K.N. Krishnanand and D. Ghose, A glowworm swarm optimization based multi-robot system for signal source localization, in Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer, Berlin (2009) 49–68. [Google Scholar]
  • K. McGill and S. Taylor, Comparing swarm algorithms for multi-source localization, in 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security & Rescue Robotics (SSRR 2009). IEEE (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • M.S. Couceiro, P.A. Vargas, R.P. Rocha and N.M. Ferreira, Benchmark of swarm robotics distributed techniques in a search task. Robot. Auton. Syst. 62 (2014) 200–213. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Zheng, J. Li, J. Li and Y. Tan, Improved group explosion strategy for searching multiple targets using swarm robotics, in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • H. Tang, W. Sun, H. Yu, A. Lin, M. Xue and Y. Song, A novel hybrid algorithm based on PSO and FOA for target searching in unknown environments. Appl. Intell. 49 (2019) 2603–2622. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Iriondo, E. Lazkano, A. Ansuategi, A. Rivera, I. Lluvia and C. Tubo, Learning positioning policies for mobile manipulation operations with deep reinforcement learning. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 14 (2023) 3003–3023. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhao, B. Chen, X. Wang, Z. Zhu, Y. Wang, G. Cheng, R. Wang, M. He and Y. Liu, A deep reinforcement learning based searching method for source localization. Inf. Sci. 588 (2022) 67–81. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Luo, T.H. Luan, W. Shi and P. Fan, Deep reinforcement learning based computation offloading and trajectory planning for multi-UAV cooperative target search. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 41 (2023) 504–520. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Zhao, H. Lu, S. Yang and F. Guo, The experience-memory q-learning algorithm for robot path planning in unknown environment. IEEE Access 8 (2020) 47824–47844. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Bai, H. Pang, Z. He, B. Zhao and T. Wang, Path planning of autonomous mobile robot in comprehensive unknown environment using deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Internet Things J. 11 (2024) 22153–22166. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Arulkumaran, M.P. Deisenroth, M.P. Brundage and A.A. Bharath, Deep reinforcement learning: a brief survey. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34 (2017) 26–38. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Dulac-Arnold, N. Levine, D.J. Mankowitz, J. Li, C. Paduraru, S. Gowal and T. Hester, Challenges of real-world reinforcement learning: definitions, benchmarks and analysis. Mach. Learn. 110 (2021) 2419–2468. [Google Scholar]
  • G.G. Wang, L.D.S. Coelho, X.Z. Gao and S. Deb, A new metaheuristic optimisation algorithm motivated by elephant herding behaviour. Int. J. Bio-Inspired Comput. 8 (2016) 394. [Google Scholar]
  • N.A. Houacine and H. Drias, DISS: a discrete input-space sampling path planning and obstacle avoidance strategy for swarm robotics, in Artificial Intelligence Doctoral Symposium. Springer Nature, Singapore (2023) 148–161. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Soydaner, A comparison of optimization algorithms for deep learning. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 34 (2020) 2052013. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Nguyen, K. Pham, D. Ngo, T. Ngo and L. Pham, An analysis of state-of-the-art activation functions for supervised deep neural network, in 2021 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE) (2021) 215–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.A. LeCun, L. Bottou, G.B. Orr and K.-R. Müller, Efficient BackProp, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin (2012) 9–48. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Glorot and Y. Bengio, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, edited by Y.W. Teh and M. Titterington. Vol. 9 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. Chia Laguna Resort, Italy (2010) 249–256. [Google Scholar]
  • K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren and J. Sun, Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification, in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • L.N. Smith, Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks, in 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Kuang and L. Zhao, A practical GPU based kNN algorithm, in Proceedings of the Second Symposium on International Computer Science and Computational Technology (ISCSCT’09). Academy Publisher (2009) 151–155. [Google Scholar]
  • D.W. Aha, Tolerating noisy, irrelevant and novel attributes in instance-based learning algorithms. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 36 (2012) 267–287. [Google Scholar]
  • A.C. Cameron and F.A. Windmeijer, An r-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J. Econom. 77 (1997) 329–342. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Cheng, Y. Shi, Q. Qin, Q. Zhang and R. Bai, Population diversity maintenance in brain storm optimization algorithm. J. Artif. Intell. Soft Comput. Res. 4 (2014) 83–97. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Hussain, M.N.M. Salleh, S. Cheng and Y. Shi, On the exploration and exploitation in popular swarm-based metaheuristic algorithms. Neural Comput. Appl. 31 (2018) 7665–7683. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, in Proceedings of ICNN 95 International Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • J.C. Bansal, P.K. Singh, M. Saraswat, A. Verma, S.S. Jadon and A. Abraham, Inertia weight strategies in particle swarm optimization, in 2011 Third World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing. IEEE (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Rathore and H. Sharma, Review on inertia weight strategies for particle swarm optimization, in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Singapore (2017) 76–86. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Xin, G. Chen and Y. Hai, A particle swarm optimizer with multi-stage linearly-decreasing inertia weight, in 2009 International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization. IEEE (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • R.G. Reynolds, An introduction to cultural algorithms, in Evolutionary Programming Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference, edited by A.V. Sebald and L.J. Fogel. World Scientific Press, Singapore (1994) 131–139. [Google Scholar]
  • N.A. Houacine and H. Drias, Self-parameterized swarm intelligence algorithms for targets’ detection in complex and unknown environments, in Hybrid Intelligent Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021) 690–699. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Bruce, L. Wannian, D. Xiaoping, E. Tim, F. Dale, I. Chikwe, L. Clifford, L. Jong-Koo, L. Gabriel, L. Jiangtao, L. Haiying, P. Natalia, S. Aleksandr, T. Hitoshi, V.K. Maria, W. Bin, W. Guangfa, W. Fan, W. Zhongze, W. Zunyou, X. Jun, Y. Kwok-Yung, Z. Weigong, Z. Yong and Z. Lei, Report of the who-china joint mission on coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19). Technical Report. World Health Organization, China (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Comment Ipidmiologie tente de cerner lpidmie due au nouveau coronavirus. Le Monde (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Ramezani, D. Bahmanyar and N. Razmjooy, A new improved model of marine predator algorithm for optimization problems. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 46 (2021) 8803–8826. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.