EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 3 (May-June 2026) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 60 3 (2026) 1681-1700 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 60, Number 3, May-June 2026
Page(s) 1681 - 1700
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2026037
Published online 19 June 2026
  • A. Faried, A.S. Alam and S.W. Wantu, Policy Analysis Study: Concepts, Theories and Applications of Government Policy Analysis Techniques. Refika Aditama Corp, Bandung (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • L.L. Liu, A. Suh and C. Wagner, Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfunding. Int. Res. 28 (2018) 623–651. [Google Scholar]
  • S.U. Rahman and D.K. Smith, Use of location–allocation models in health service development planning in developing nations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 123 (2000) 437–452. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Narasimhan, S. Talluri, J. Sarkis and A. Ross, Efficient service location design in government services: a decision support system framework. J. Oper. Manage. 23 (2005) 163–178. [Google Scholar]
  • H.R.L. Azad and N.S. Boushehri, Billboard advertising modeling by using Network Count Location Problem. Int. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 4 (2014) 146–160. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Lotfi, Y.Z. Mehrjerdi and N. Mardani, A multi-objective and multi-product advertising billboard location model with attraction factor mathematical modeling and solutions. Int. J. Appl. Logistics (IJAL) 7 (2017) 64–86. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Park and S.Y. Sohn, An optimization approach for the placement of bicycle-sharing stations to reduce short car trips: an application to the city of Seoul. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 105 (2017) 154–166. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Gupta, S.K. Muttoo and S.K. Pal, Fuzzy c-means clustering and particle swarm optimization based scheme for common service center location allocation. Appl. Intell. 47 (2017) 624–643. [Google Scholar]
  • J.A. Tali, M.M. Malik, S. Divyashree, A. Nusrath and B. Mahalingam, Location–allocation model applied to urban public services: spatial analysis of fire stations in Mysore urban area Karnataka, India. Int. J. Adv. Res. Dev. 2 (2017) 795–801. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Banerjee, M.M. Kabir, N.K. Khadem and C. Chavis, Optimal locations for bikeshare stations: a new GIS based spatial approach. Transp. Res. Interdiscipl. Perspect. 4 (2020) 100101. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Omrani, Z. Naji-Azimi, A. Pooya and M. Salari, Optimal location of electronic charity boxes in charity NGOs by proposing a combined mathematical model. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 1523–1540. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Salami, B. Afshar-Nadjafi and M. Amiri, A two-stage optimization approach for healthcare facility location–allocation problems with service delivering based on genetic algorithm. Int. J. Publ. Health 68 (2023) 1605015. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Shiode and Z. Drezner, A competitive facility location problem on a tree network with stochastic weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 149 (2003) 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Drezner, Z. Drezner and Z. Goldstein, A stochastic gradual cover location problem. Nav. Res. Logistics (NRL) 57 (2010) 367–372. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Dell’Amico and S. Novellani, A two-echelon facility location problem with stochastic demands for urban construction logistics: an application within the SUCCESS project, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI). IEEE (2017) 90–95. [Google Scholar]
  • J. de Armas, A.A. Juan, J.M. Marquès and J.P. Pedroso, Solving the deterministic and stochastic uncapacitated facility location problem: from a heuristic to a simheuristic. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 68 (2017) 1161–1176. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Marković, I.O. Ryzhov and P. Schonfeld, Evasive flow capture: a multi-period stochastic facility location problem with independent demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 257 (2017) 687–703. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Alizadeh, M. Amiri-Aref, N. Mustafee and S. Matilal, A robust stochastic Casualty Collection Points location problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 279 (2019) 965–983. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Mousavi, S.A. Darestani and P. Azimi, An artificial neural network based mathematical model for a stochastic health care facility location problem. Health Care Manage. Sci. 24 (2021) 499–514. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Liu, Y. Chen and S. Wang, Robust stochastic facility location: sensitivity analysis and managerial insights. INFORMS J. Comput. 34 (2022) 3029–3047. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Marín, L.I. Martínez-Merino, A.M. Rodríguez-Chía and F. Saldanha-da-Gama, Multi-period stochastic covering location problems: modeling framework and solution approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 319 (2024) 512–530. [Google Scholar]
  • K.F. Doerner, W.J. Gutjahr and P.C. Nolz, Multi-criteria location planning for public facilities in tsunami-prone coastal areas. OR Spectrum 31 (2009) 651–678. [Google Scholar]
  • H.A. Hassan-Pour, M. Mosadegh-Khah and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Solving a multi-objective multi-depot stochastic location-routing problem by a hybrid simulated annealing algorithm. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 223 (2009) 1045–1054. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Gang, Y. Tu, B. Lev, J. Xu, W. Shen and L. Yao, A multi-objective bi-level location planning problem for stone industrial parks. Comput. Oper. Res. 56 (2015) 8–21. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Tian, M. Zhou, P.> Li, C. Zhang and H. Jia, Multi-objective optimization models for locating vehicle inspection stations subject to stochastic demand, varying velocity and regional constraints. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 (2016) 1978–1987. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Zhalechian, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Y. Rahimi and F. Jolai, An interactive possibilistic programming approach for a multi-objective hub location problem: economic and environmental design. Appl. Soft Comput. 52 (2017) 699–713. [Google Scholar]
  • B. El Itani, F. Ben Abdelaziz and H. Masri, A bi-objective covering location problem: case of ambulance location in the Beirut area, Lebanon. Manage. Decis. 57 (2019) 432–444. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Maharjan and S. Hanaoka, A credibility-based multi-objective temporary logistics hub location–allocation model for relief supply and distribution under uncertainty. Soc.-Econ. Planning Sci. 70 (2020) 100727. [Google Scholar]
  • S.N. Parragh, F. Tricoire and W.J. Gutjahr, A branch-and-Benders-cut algorithm for a bi-objective stochastic facility location problem. OR Spect. 44 (2021) 419–459. [Google Scholar]
  • S.B. Ebrahimi, A robust multi-objective MIP model to optimize the supply chain of steel industry taking into account the sustainability approach. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 58 (2024) 1727–1748. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Peng, S.H. Gao, D. Yu, Y.P. Xiao and Y.J. Luo, Multi-objective optimization for multimodal transportation routing problem with stochastic transportation time based on data-driven approaches. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 57 (2023) 1745–1767. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Lwin and I. Phau, Characteristics of charitable donors in Australia, in Recent Advances in Retailing and Services Science Conference, Jul 2, 2010, edited by H. Timmermans. Recent Advances in Retailing and Services Science, Istanbul (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • J.D. Marx and V.B. Carter, Factors influencing US charitable giving during the great recession: implications for nonprofit administration. Admin. Sci. 4 (2014) 350–372. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Yao, Who gives? The determinants of charitable giving, volunteering, and their relationship. University of Pennsylvania, Wharton Research Scholars. 126 (2015). https://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars/126. [Google Scholar]
  • R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley (1976). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, E.K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat and Z. Turskis, Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica 26 (2015) 435–451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.L. Hwang and A.S.M. Masud, Multiple Objective Decision Making – Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey. Vol. 164. Springer Science and Business Media (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • S.S. Nabavi, M. Souzban, M.R. Safi and Z. Sarmast, Solving fuzzy stochastic multi-objective programming problems based on a fuzzy inequality. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17 (2020) 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  • P.K. De, D. Acharya and K.C. Sahu, A chance-constrained goal programming model for capital budgeting. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 33 (2012) 635–638. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Stuhlmacher and J.L. Mathieu, Water distribution networks as flexible loads: a chance-constrained programming approach. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 188 (2020) 106570. [Google Scholar]
  • F.B. Abdelaziz, B. Aouni and R. El Fayedh, Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177 (2007) 1811–1823. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Sakawa, H. Yano, I. Nishizaki and I. Nishizaki, Linear and Multi-Objective Programming with Fuzzy Stochastic Extensions. Springer US, New York, NY, USA (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Jiao, Y. Zhou and H. Xu, Why do people support online crowdfunding charities? Front. Psychol. 12 (2021) 634738. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Zaborek, Understanding charitable consumer behavior on digital crowdfunding platforms. J. Nonprofit Publ. Sector Marketing 37 (2025) 756–795. [Google Scholar]
  • CultureHive, Innovation in Fundraising Technology: The Rise of Contactless Giving (GoodBox case study). CultureHive Digital Heritage Hub (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.