Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 57, Number 2, March-April 2023
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 609 - 629 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023002 | |
Published online | 10 April 2023 |
Modelling low-carbon closed-loop supply chain considering channel power structures and cross-shareholding
School of Economics and Management, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, P.R. China
* Corresponding author: sjy_sjx@163.com
Received:
27
May
2022
Accepted:
4
January
2023
Under the background of low-carbon economy, cross-shareholding is introduced into the low-carbon closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) composed of a manufacturer and a retailer, a centralized and three decentralized decision-making models with different channel power structures are constructed. The recovery, emission reduction, and pricing decisions of low-carbon CLSC are studied, and a two-part-tariff contract is proposed to coordinate the low-carbon CLSC. The results indicate that under three channel power structures, the improvement of the cross-shareholding ratio and consumers’ low-carbon awareness are beneficial to improve recovery rate, carbon emission reduction and increase market demand. Under Nash Game, the profit of low-carbon CLSC can reach the centralized level which means cross-shareholding can realize the coordination of low-carbon CLSC. Under Stackelberg Game, the enterprise with larger channel power can always obtain higher profit. Cross-shareholding cannot coordinate the retailer-led low-carbon CLSC, however it can realize the partial coordination of the manufacturer-led low-carbon CLSC. Two-part-tariff contract can realize the coordination of low-carbon CLSC under both situations.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 90B05
Key words: Low-carbon CLSC / cross-shareholding / channel power structures / two-part-tariff contract
© The authors. Published by EDP Sciences, ROADEF, SMAI 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.