Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 54, Number 4, July-August 2020
Page(s) 933 - 948
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2019014
Published online 16 April 2020
  • C. Alcouffe, L’organisation de la R&D entre marché et hiérarchie. Evolutions de la relation client-fournisseur et forme de coopération dans l’aéronautique et le spatial. In: Marché(s) et hiérarchie(s), edited by M. Saboly and L. Cailluet (2002) 275–288. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Alcouffe and N. Corrégé, Structures de gouvernance dans l’entreprise étendue: l’exemple d’Airbus. Notes du LIRHE 393 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • C. Altersohn, La sous-traitance à l’aube du XXIième siècle. Dynamiques d’Entreprises L’Harmattan (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Amit and P.J.H. Schomaker, Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strat. Manage. J. 14 (1993) 33–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Araujo, A. Dubois and L.E. Gadde, Managing interfaces with suppliers. Ind. Marketing Manage. 28 (1999) 497–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Asanuma, Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 3 (1989) 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Baldwin and K. Clark, Managing in an Age of Modularity. In: Managing in the modular age, edited by R. Garud, A. Kumaraswamy, R.N. Langlois. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (1997) 149–161. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Baldwin and K. Clark, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.B. Barney, Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy, Manage. Sci. 32 (1986) 1231–1241. [Google Scholar]
  • J.B. Barney, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage. 17 (1991) 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Batsch, Le recentrage: une revue. Cahiers de Recherche du CEREG (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • B. Billaudot and P.A. Julien, Organisation industrielle et sous-traitance: du fordisme à l’entreprise-réseau, edited by P.A. Julien, R. Jacob, L. Raymond and G. Abdul-Nour. In: L’entreprise-réseau, dix ans d’expérience de la Chaire Bombardier Produits récréatifs. Presses de l’Université du Québec (2003) 47–71. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Brusoni and A. Prencipe, Modularity in complex Product systems: Managing the Knowledge dimension. Working Paper CoPS Publication 57 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Brusoni, A. Prencipe and K. Pawitt, Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling and boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?. Adm. Sci. Q. 46 (2001) 597–621. [Google Scholar]
  • L.E. Cárdenas-Barrón, Optimizing inventory decisions in a multi-stage multi-customer supply chain: A note. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 43 (2007) 647–654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L.E. Cárdenas-Barrón and S.S. Sana, Multi-item EOQ inventory model in a two-layer supply chain while demand varies with promotional effort. Appl. Math. Model. 39 (2015) 6725–6737. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Carlsson and G. Eliasson, The nature and importance of Economic Competence. Ind. Corp. Change 3 (1994) 687–711. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.D. Chandler, Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Harvard University Press (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • K.J. Chung, L.E. Cárdenas-Barrón, P.S. Ting, An inventory model with non-instantaneous receipt and exponentially deteriorating items for an integrated three-layer supply chain system under two levels of trade credit period. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 155 (2014) 310–317. [Google Scholar]
  • K.B. Clark, Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Manage. Sci. 35 (1989) 1247–1263. [Google Scholar]
  • K.B. Clark and T. Fujimoto, Product development performance. Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Cohendet and P. Llerena, A dual theory of the firm between transactions and competences: Conceptual analysis and empirical considerations. Revue d’Economie Industrielle 110 (2005) 175–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G. Colletis and Y. Lung, La France industrielle en question. Analyses sectorielles, La Documentation française (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • K.R. Conner and C.K. Prahalad, A Resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. 7 (1996) 477–501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Das, An integrated supply chain model under fuzzy chance constraints. Adv. Model. Optim. 16 (2014) 113–132. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Dierickx and K. Cool, Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manage. Sci. 35 (1989) 1504–1511. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Dosi, M. Hobday, L. Marengo and A. Prencipe, The Economics of Systems Integration: Towards an Evolutionary Interpretation. In: The business of systems integration. Oxford University Press (2005) 95–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P.R. Drake, D.M. Lee and M. Hussain, The lean and agile purchasing portfolio model. Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 18 (2013) 3–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Durand, L’alchimie de la compétence. Revue Française de Gestion 160 (2006) 261–292. [Google Scholar]
  • J.H. Dyer, Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organ. Sci. 7 (1996) 649–666. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.H. Dyer, D.S. Cho and W. Chu, Strategic supplier segmentation: The next best practice in Supply Chain Management. Calif. Manage. Rev. 40 (1998) 57–77. [Google Scholar]
  • J.H. Dyer and H. Singh, The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 4 (1998) 660–679. [Google Scholar]
  • J.H. Dyer, P. Kale and H. Singh, How to make strategic alliances work. Sloan Manage. Rev. 42 (2001) 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  • N.J. Foss, Capabilities and the Theory of the Firm. DRUID Working Paper 96-8 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • K. Foss, Modular Product Design: Creating Technologically Separable Interfaces, DRUID Working Paper (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • F. Frery, La Chane et le Réseau, edited by P. Besson. Dedans, Dehors, Vuibert (1997) 23–53. [Google Scholar]
  • V. Frigant, La modularité: un fondement pour des firmes architectes? Cahiers du GRES (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • V. Frigant, Vanishing hand versus systems integrators. Une revue de la littérature sur l’impact organisationnel de la modularité. Revue d’Economie Industrielle 109 (2005) 29–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Fujimoto and A. Takeishi, Modularization in Auto Industry: Interlinked Multiples hierarchies of Product, Production and Suppliers Systems, Working Paper CIRJE-F-107 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • C.J. Gelderman and A.J. Van Weele, Handling measurement issues and strategic directions in Kraljic’s purchasing portfolio model. J. Purch. Supply Manage. 9 (2003) 207–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.M. Grant, The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Manage. Rev. (1991) 114–135. [Google Scholar]
  • R.M. Grant, Toward a Knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strat. Manage. J. 17 (1996) 109–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Guilhon, Technologie, organisation et performances: le cas de la firme-réseau. Revue d’Economie Politique 102 (1992) 563–592. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Hamel and C.K. Prahalad, The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68 (1990) 79–91. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Hamel and C.K. Prahalad, Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • K. Imai and Y. Baba, Systematic Innovation and Cross-border Networks, Transcending Markets and Hierarchies to Create New a New Techno-economic System. Séminaire Science technologie et croissance économique OCDE (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • D.K. Jana, B. Das and K. Maity, Fuzzy rough supply chain model under inflation and credit period with stock dependent consumption rate and partial backlogging shortages via genetic algorithm. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Math. 6 (2015) 555–580. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.C. Jarillo, On strategic networks. Strat. Manage. J. 9 (1988) 31–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Kaufman, C.H. Wood and G. Theyel, Collaboration and technology linkages: A strategic supplier typology. Strat. Manage. J. 21 (2000) 649–663. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Kraljic, Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Bus. Rev. 61 (1983) 109–117. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Krapfel, D. Salmond and R. Spekman, A strategic approach to managing buyer-seller relationships. Eur. J. Mark. 25 (1991) 22–37. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Kogut and U. Zander, Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3 (1992) 383–397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.N. Langlois, The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Ind. Corp. Change 12 (2003) 351–385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Larson, Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of governance of exchange relationships. Adm. Sci. Q. 37 (1992) 76–104. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Lawson, P. Cousins, R. Handfield and K.J. Petersen, Strategic purchasing, supply management practices and buyer performance improvement: An empirical study of UK manufacturing organisations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47 (2009) 2649–2667. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Loasby, The organization of capabilities. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 35 (1998) 139–160. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Lorenzoni and C. Baden-Fuller, Creating a strategic centre to manage a web of partner. Calif. Manage. Rev. 37 (1995) 146–163. [Google Scholar]
  • J.M. Loubère et R. Perrotin, Stratégies d’achat. Sous-traitance, Partenariat, Délocalisation. Editions d’Organisation 5e édition, Paris (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • A.K. Manna, B. Das, J.K. Dey, S.K. Mondal, Two layers green supply chain imperfect production inventory model under bi-level credit period. Tékhne 15 (2017) 124–142. [Google Scholar]
  • A.K. Manna, J.K. Dey and S.K. Mondal, Two layers supply chain in an imperfect production inventory model with two storage facilities under reliability consideration. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 35 (2018) 57–73. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Mazaud, De la firme sous-traitante de premier rang à la firme pivot: une mutation de l’organisation du système productif Airbus. Revue d’Economie Industrielle 113 (2006) 45–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Mazaud, De la firme-sous-traitante de premier rang à la firme pivot, l’organisation du système productif Airbus, Ph.D. thesis. University of Toulouse, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • P.X. Meschi, Le concept de compétences en stratégie: perspectives et limites. Communication à la VIème conférence AIMS Montréal (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • R.E. Miles and C.C. Snow, Organization: New concept for new forms. Calif. Manage. Rev. 28 (1986) 62–73. [Google Scholar]
  • R.E. Miles, C.C. Snow and H.J. Coleman, Managing 21st century network organizations. Organ. Dyn. 23 (1992) 5–20. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Moati, Organiser les marchés, dans une économie fondée sur la connaissance: Le rôle clé des intégrateurs. Revue d’Economie Industrielle 97 (2001) 123–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Moati and E.M. Mouhoud, Les nouvelles logiques de décomposition internationale des processus productifs. Revue d’Economie Politique 5 (2005) 573–590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.F. Olsen and L.M. Ellram, A portfolio approach to supplier relationships. Ind. Marketing Manage. 26 (1997) 101–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G. Paché and C. Paraponaris, L’entreprise en Réseau. Que Sais-Je? 2704 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • S.S. Padhi, S.M. Wagner and V. Aggarwal, Positioning of commodities using the Kraljic Portfolio Matrix. J. Purch. Supply Manage. 18 (2012) 1–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Pavitt, Innovation Processes. In: Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson. Oxford University Press (2005) 86–147. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Penrose, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press, New York (1959). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Peteraf, The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strat. Manage. J. 14 (1993) 179–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York (1966). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Porter, Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strat. Manage. J. 12 (1991) 95–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Prencipe, Corporate strategy and systems integration capabilities. Managing networks in complex systems industries. In: The business of systems integration, edited by A. Prencipe, A. Davies, M. Hobday. Oxford University Press (2005) 114–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G.B. Richardson, The organization of industry. Econ. J. 82 (1972) 883–896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.P. Rumelt, The competitive challenge, edited by D. Teece. In: Theory, Strategy and Entrepreneurship, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA (1987) 137–158. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Sako, Modularity and Outsourcing: The Nature of Co-evolution of Product Architecture and Organisation Architecture in the Global Automotive Industry. In: The business of systems integration, edited by A. Davies and M. Hobday and A. Prencipe. Oxford University Press (2005) 229–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Sanchez, Understanding competence-based management, identifying and managing five modes of competence. J. Bus. Res. 57 (2004) 518–532. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Sanchez, A. Heene and H. Thomas, Dynamics of Competence-Based Competition: Theory and Practice in the New Strategic Management. Elsevier London (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Sanchez and J.T. Mahoney, Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strat. Manage. J. 147 (1996) 63–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.C. Spender, Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strat. Manage. J. 17 (1996) 45–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Starr, Modular production a new concept. Harvard Bus. Rev. 43 (1965) 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  • D.J. Teece, Technological change and the nature of the firm. In: Technical change and economic theory, edited by G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete. Francis Pinter, London, and Columbia University Press, New York (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • D.J. Teece, G. Pisano and A. Shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Manage. J. 18 (1997) 509–533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Ulrich, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24 (1995) 419–440. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Venkatesan, Strategic sourcing: To make or not to make. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1992) 98–107. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Wernerfelt, A resource-based view of the firm. Strat. Manage. J. 15 (1984) 171–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.M. Zuliani and G. Jalabert, L’industrie aéronautique européenne: organisation industrielle et fonctionnement en réseaux. L’Espace Géographique 2 (2005) 117–133. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.