Free Access
Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, 2021
Regular articles published in advance of the transition of the journal to Subscribe to Open (S2O). Free supplement sponsored by the Fonds National pour la Science Ouverte
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | S2359 - S2372 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2020084 | |
Published online | 02 March 2021 |
- H. Ahn, L. Neumann and N. Vazquez Novoa, Measuring the relative balance of DMUs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 221 (2012) 417–423 [corrigendum: Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222 (2012) 686.]. [Google Scholar]
- M.R. Alirezaee and M. Rajabi Tanha, Extending the Malmquist index to consider the balance factor of decision making units in a productivity analysis. IMA J. Manage. Math. 27 (2016) 439–452. [Google Scholar]
- R. Allen, A. Athanassopoulos, R.G. Dyson and E. Thanassoulis, Weights restrictions and value judgments in data envelopment analysis: evolution development and future directions. Ann. Oper. Res. 73 (1997) 13–34. [Google Scholar]
- R.D. Banker, A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 31 (1984) 1078–1092. [Google Scholar]
- A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. [Google Scholar]
- S. Dimitrov and W. Sutton, Generalized symmetric weight assignment technique: incorporating managerial preferences in data envelopment analysis using a penalty function. Omega 41 (2013) 48–54. [Google Scholar]
- H. Dyckhoff, M. Clermont, A. Dirksen and E. Mbock, Measuring balanced effectiveness and efficiency of German business schools research performance. In: Performance Management im Hochschulbereich, edited by Alexander Dilger, Harald Dyckhoff and Günter Fandel. Springer Gabler (2013) 39–60. [Google Scholar]
- R.G. Dyson and E. Thanassoulis, Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 39 (1988) 563–576. [Google Scholar]
- R.G. Dyson, R. Allen, A.S. Camanho, V.V. Podinovski, C.S. Sarrico and E.A. Shale, Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132 (2001) 245–259. [Google Scholar]
- H. Eilat, B. Golany and A. Shtub, Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 172 (2006) 1018–1039 [Google Scholar]
- M.P. Estellita Lins, A.C. Moreira da Silva, C.A.K. Lovell, Avoiding infeasibility in DEA models with weight restrictions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181 (2007) 956–966. [Google Scholar]
- M. Halme, T. Joro, P. Korhonen, S. Salo and J. Wallenius, Avalue efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 45 (1999) 103–115. [Google Scholar]
- M. Khalili, A.S. Camanho, M.C.A.S. Portela and M.R. Alirezaee, The measurement of relative efficiency using data envelopment analysis with assurance regions that link inputs and outputs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203 (2010) 761–770. [Google Scholar]
- F. Pedraja-Chaparro, J. Salinas-Jimenez and P. Smith, On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Prod. Anal. 8 (1997) 215–230. [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Podinovski, Side effects of absolute weight bounds in DEA models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 115 (1999) 583–595. [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Podinovski, DEA models for explicit maximization of relative efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 52 (2001) 572–586. [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Podinovski, Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55 (2004) 1311–1322. [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Podinovski, Computation of efficient targets in DEA models with production trade-offs and weight restrictions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181 (2007) 586–591. [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Podinovski, Optimal weights in DEA models with weight restrictions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254 (2016) 916–924. [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Podinovski and A. Athanassopoulos, Assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units using DEA models with weight restrictions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49 (1998) 500–508. [Google Scholar]
- C.S. Sarrico and R.G. Dyson, Restricting virtual weights in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 159 (2004) 17–34. [Google Scholar]
- E. Thanassoulis, M.C.A.S. Portela and O. Despic, Data envelopment analysis: the mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. In: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth, edited by H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt. Oxford University Press, New York (2008) 251–420. [Google Scholar]
- R.G. Thompson, F.D. Singleton, R.M. Thrall and B.A. Smith, Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16 (1986) 35–49. [Google Scholar]
- R.G. Thompson, L.N. Langemeier, C. Lee, E. Lee and R.M. Thrall, The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. J. Econom. 46 (1990) 93–108. [Google Scholar]
- D.L. Tracy and B. Chen, A generalized model for weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56 (2005) 390–396. [Google Scholar]
- Y.-H.B. Wong and J.E. Beasley, Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 41 (1990) 829–835. [Google Scholar]
- A. Zanella, A.S. Camanho and T.G. Dias, Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245 (2015) 517–530. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.