Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, Number 2, March-April 2021
Page(s) 521 - 544
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021006
Published online 31 March 2021
  • M. Agbo, D. Rousseliere and J. Salanie, Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: a cooperative non-cooperative game. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 109 (2015) 56–71. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Ahmad, M. Afzal and A. Rauf, Analysis of wheat farmers’ risk perceptions and attitudes: evidence from Punjab, Pakistan. Nat. Hazard. 95 (2019) 845–861. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Alizamir, F. Iravani and F. Mamani, An analysis of price vs. revenue protection: government subsidies in the agriculture industry. Manage. Sci. 65 (2019) 32–49. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Anderson and M. Monjardino, Contract design in agriculture supply chains with random yield. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 277 (2019) 1072–1082. [Google Scholar]
  • K.B. Atici, A. Ulucan and I.U. Bayar, The measurement of agricultural productivity change in OECD countries with Fuzzy data. RAIRO:OR 52 (2018) 1003–1017. [Google Scholar]
  • P.J. Barry, K.J. Collins and J.W. Glauber, Crop insurance, disaster assistance, and the role of the federal government in providing catastrophic risk protection. Agric. Finance Rev. 62 (2013) 81–101. [Google Scholar]
  • J.A. Buzacott and R.Q. Zhang, Inventory management with asset-based financing. Manage. Sci. 50 (2004) 1274–1292. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Cai, The impact of insurance provision on household production and financial decisions. Am. Econ. J.: Econ. Policy 8 (2016) 44–88. [Google Scholar]
  • J.H. Cai, X.Q. Hu, F.Y. Jiang, Q. Zhou, X.Y. Zhang and L.Y. Xuan, Optimal input quantity decisions considering commitment order contracts under yield uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 216 (2019) 398–412. [Google Scholar]
  • X.F. Chen, A model of trade credit in a capital-constrained distribution channel. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159 (2015) 347–357. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Chen, M. Sim, D. Simchi-Levi and P. Sun, Risk aversion in inventory management. Oper. Res. 55 (2007) 828–842. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen, M. Xu and G.A. Zhang, Risk-averse newsvendor model under the CVaR decision criterion. Oper. Res. 57 (2009) 1040–1044. [Google Scholar]
  • K.Z. Chen, P.K. Joshi, E. Cheng and P.S. Birthal, Innovations in financing of agri-food value chains in China and India. Chin. Agric. Econ. Rev. 7 (2016) 616–640. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chen, H. Wei and L. Xie, The role of business insurance in managing a manufacturer’s product quality risk. Oper. Res. Lett. 45 (2017) 635–641. [Google Scholar]
  • B.B. Christopher, F.B. Marc and Y.H. Janet, Reconsidering conventional explanations of the inverse productivity-size relationship. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 38 (2010) 88–97. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Cole, D. Stein and J. Tobacman, Dynamics of demand for index insurance: evidence from a long-run field experiment. American Econ. Rev. 104 (2014) 284–290. [Google Scholar]
  • CRSY, National agricultural products cost and profits. In Chapter 10 of China Rural Statistical Yearbook (2019) 273–279https://data.cnki.net/area/yearbook/Single/N2019120190?z=D22. [Google Scholar]
  • L.X. Dong and B. Tomlin, Managing disruption risk: the interplay between operations and insurance. Manage. Sci. 58 (2012) 1898–1915. [Google Scholar]
  • X.D. Du, H.L. Feng and D.A. Hennessy, Rationality of choices in subsidized crop insurance markets. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 99 (2017) 732–756. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Elahi, M. Abid, L. Zhang, S.U. Haq and J.G.M. Sahito, Agricultural advisory and financial services; farm level access, outreach and impact in a mixed cropping district of Punjab, Pakistan. Land Use Policy 71 (2018) 249–260. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Fadhliani, J. Luckstead and E.J. Wailes, The impacts of multiperil crop insurance on Indonesian rice farmers and production. Agri. Econ. 50 (2019) 15–26. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2017 The impact of disasters crises on agriculture and food security (2018). http://www.fao.org/3/I8656EN/i8656en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Federgruen, U. Lall and A.S. Simsek, Supply chain analysis of contract farming. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 21 (2019) 361–378. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Freudenreich and O. Musshoff, Insurance for technology adoption: an experimental evaluation of schemes and subsidies with Maize farmers in Mexico. J. Agric. Econ. 69 (2018) 96–120. [Google Scholar]
  • H.Y. Fu, J.W. Li, Y.J. Li, S.Z. Huang and X.K. Sun, Risk transfer mechanism for agricultural products supply chain based on weather index insurance. Complexity 2018 (2018) 2369423. [Google Scholar]
  • J.F. Gonzaga, O.F. Vilpoux and M.W.G. Pereira, Factors influencing influencing technological practices in the Brazilian agrarian reform. Land Use Policy 80 (2019) 150–162. [Google Scholar]
  • J. He, X.Y. Zheng, R.M. Rejesus and J.M. Yorobe, Moral hazard and adverse selection effects of cost-of-production crop insurance: evidence from the Philippines. Aust. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 63 (2019) 166–197. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hervas, Land, development and contract farming on the Guatemalan oil palm frontier. J. Peasant Stud. 46 (2019) 115–141. [Google Scholar]
  • R.V. Hill, N. Kumar and N. Magnan, Ex ante and ex post effects of hybrid index insurance in Bangladesh. J. Dev. Econ. 136 (2019) 1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.S. Huang, Y.C. Hsu and H.H. Fang, A study on contractual agreements in supply chains of agricultural produce. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 3766–3783. [Google Scholar]
  • X.L. Liu, Y.M. Tang, J.H. Ge and M.J. Miranda, Does experience with natural disasters affect willingness-to-pay for weather index insurance? Evidence from China. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 33 (2019) 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Luo, W.M. Li and J. Chen, Moderate scale of food production operations: two-dimensional perspective on output and efficiency. J. Manage. World 1 (2017) 78–88. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Mieno, C.G. Walters and L.E. Fulginiti, Input use under crop insurance: the role of actual production history. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 100 (2018) 1469–1485. [Google Scholar]
  • NAES (National Academy of Economic Strategy), 2016 Blue book on internet finance for agriculture, rural areas and farmers released by NAES, August 22, (2016). http://naes.cssn.cn/cj_zwz/zczx/zdgz/201608/t20160822_4283205.shtml. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Niu, D. Jin and X. Pu, Coordination of channel members’ efforts and utilities in contract farming operations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 255 (2016) 869–883. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Pantzios, P. Fousekis, Output price risk and productivity growth in greek agriculture. Spoudai 50 (2015) 106–124. [Google Scholar]
  • H.J. Peng and T. Pang, Financing strategies for a capital-constrained supplier under yield uncertainty. J. Ind. Manage. Optim. 16 (2020) 887–909. [Google Scholar]
  • H.J. Peng and T. Pang, Optimal strategies for a three-level contract-farming supply chain with subsidy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 216 (2019) 274–286. [Google Scholar]
  • J.C. Quiggin, G. Karagiannis and J. Stanton, Crop insurance and crop production: an empirical study of moral hazard and adverse selection. Aust. J. Agric. Econ. 37 (1993) 935–949. [Google Scholar]
  • T.R. Rockafellar, Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance 26 (2002) 1443–1471. [Google Scholar]
  • T.R. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2 (2000) 21–42. [Google Scholar]
  • A.K. Sharma, S. Tiwari, V. Yadavalli and C.K. Jaggi, Optimal trade credit and replenishment policies for non-instantaneous deteriorating items. RAIRO:OR 54 (2020) 1793–1826. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Ton, W. Vellema, S. Desiere, Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes: What can we learn from effectiveness studies? World Dev. 104 (2018) 46–64. [Google Scholar]
  • G.Z. Tuo, Rationality “insurance”. J. Insurance Res. 9 (2007) 7–8+36. [Google Scholar]
  • H.S. Vincent and K.G. Barry, Crop insurance, moral hazard, and agricultural chemical use. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 78 (1996) 428–438. [Google Scholar]
  • W.L. Wang and N. Guo, Commercial insurance supports the operational decision of ordering the agricultural supply chain. Syst. Eng. 36 (2018) 85–95. [Google Scholar]
  • D.D. Wu, L.P. Yang and D.L. Olson, Green supply chain management under capital constraint. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 215 (2018) 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Yan, Y.R. Chen and S.Y. He, Decision making and coordination of fresh agriculture product supply chain considering fairness concerns. RAIRO:OR 54 (2020) 1231–1248. [Google Scholar]
  • H.L. Yang, L.L. Chu and H. Wan, Advertising and pricing policies in a two-echelon supply chain with a capital-constrained retailer. RAIRO:OR 53 (2019) 1331–1342. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Ye, J.H. Huang and Q. Lin, The optimal production strategies of the farmer in contract-farming supply chain under capital constraint. Syst. Eng.-Theory Prac. 37 (2017) 1467–1478. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Ye, Q. Lin and Y. Li, Coordination for contract farming supply chain with stochastic yield and demand under CVaR criterion. Oper. Res. 20 (2020) 369–397. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Yu, W.G. Zhang and Y.J. Liu, Research on the subsidy mechanism of agricultural supply chain based on agricultural insurance. J. Manage. 14 (2017) 1546–1552. [Google Scholar]
  • J.S. Yu, A. Smith and D.A. Sumner, Effects of crop insurance premium subsidies on crop acreage. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 100 (2018) 91–114. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Zaura, The Impact of Crop Insurance on Indonesian Rice Production, Working Paper (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • Z.R. Zhang, Agricultural insurance premiums constitution and government financial subsidies options. Finance Econ. 5 (2013) 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.W. Zhou, B. Cao, Y.G. Zhong and Y.Z. Wu, Optimal advertising/ordering policy and finance mode selection for a capital-constrained retailer with stochastic demand. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 68 (2017) 1620–1632. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.