EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 55 / No 2 (March-April 2021) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 55 2 (2021) 1153-1169 References
Free Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, Number 2, March-April 2021
Page(s) 1153 - 1169
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021023
Published online 07 May 2021
  • S. Alizamir, F. de Vericourt and P. Sun, Efficient feed-in-tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Oper. Res. 64 (2016) 52–66. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Almus and D. Czarnitzki, The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 21 (2003) 226–236. [Google Scholar]
  • K.J. Arrow, Uncertainty and welfare economics of medical care. Am. Econ. Rev. 53 (1963) 941–973. [Google Scholar]
  • A.L. Atasu, N. Van Wassenhove and M. Sarvary, Efficient take-back legislation. Prod. Oper. Manage. 18 (2009) 243–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Bardhan, The new institutional economics and development theory: a brief critical assessment. World Dev. 17 (1989) 1389–1395. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Beason and D.E. Weinstein, Growth, economies of scale, and targeting in Japan (1955–1990). Rev. Econ. Stat. 78 (1996) 286–295. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Belderbos, M. Carree and B. Lokshin, Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Res. Policy 33 (2004) 1477–1492. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Berenguer, Q. Feng, J.G. Shanthikumar and L. Xu, The effects of subsidies on increasing consumption through for-profit and not-for-profit newsvendors. Prod. Oper. Manage. 26 (2017) 1191–1206. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Bergstrom, Capital subsidies and the performance of firms. Small Bus. Econ. 14 (2000) 183–193. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chemama, M.C. Cohen, R. Loble and G. Perakis, Consumer subsidies with a strategic supplier: commitment vs. flexibility. Manage. Sci. 65 (2019) 459–954. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen, S. Ding, H. Zheng, Y. Zhang and S. Yang, Exploring diffusion strategies for mHealth promotion using the evolutionary game model. Appl. Math. Comput. 336 (2018) 148–161. [Google Scholar]
  • M.C. Cohen, R. Lobel and G. Perakis, The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Manage. Sci. 62 (2016) 1235–1258. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Criscuolo, N. Nicolaou and A. Salter, The elixir (or burden) of youth? Exploring differences in innovation between start-ups and established firms. Res. Policy 41 (2012) 319–333. [Google Scholar]
  • D.F. Drake, P.R. Kleindorfer and L.N. Van Wassenhove, Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Prod. Oper. Manage. 25 (2016) 1006–1025. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Esmaeili, G. Allameh and T. Tajvidi, Using game theory for analyzing pricing models in the closed-loop supply chain from short-and long-term perspectives. International Journal of Prod. Res. 54 (2016) 2152–2169. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Freeman and L. Soete, The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Psychology Press (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • J.L. Furman and R. Hayes, Catching up or standing still?: National innovative productivity among “follower’’ countries, 1978–1999. Res. Policy 33 (2004) 1329–1354. [Google Scholar]
  • G. George, A.S. Zahra and D.R. Wood, The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. J. Bus. Venturing 17 (2002) 577–609. [Google Scholar]
  • M.C. Hu and J. Mathews, National innovative capacity in East Asia. Res. Policy 34 (2005) 1322–1349. [Google Scholar]
  • M.C. Hu and J. Mathews, China’s national innovative capacity. Res. Policy 37 (2008) 1465–1479. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Hwan and J. Tianjun, Government subsidies for green technology development under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 286 (2020) 726–739. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Ingram and P.W. Roberts, Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Am. J. Soc. 106 (2000) 387–423. [Google Scholar]
  • K.N. Kang and H. Park, Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation 32 (2012) 68–78. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Krass, T. Nedorezov and A. Ovchinnikov, Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Prod. Oper. Manage. 22 (2013) 1035–1055. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Lee and K. Om, Different factors considered in project selection at public and private R&D institutes. Technovation 16 (1996) 271–275. [Google Scholar]
  • B.W. Lin, Y. Lee and S.C. Hung, R&D Intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. J. Bus. Res. 59 (2006) 679–685. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Lobel and G. Perakis, Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. University of Pennsylvania, Working paper (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • R.E. Lucas, On the mechanics of economic development. J. Monetary Econ. 22 (1997) 3–42. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Luo, A. Rindfleisch and D.K. Tse, Working with rivals: The impact of competitor alliances on financial performance. J. Marketing Res. 44 (2007) 73–83. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Ma and P. Zhang, Game analysis on the moral hazard of construction project managers in China. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 12 (2014) 429–438. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Ma, W. Ho, P. Ji and S. Talluri, Coordinated pricing analysis with the carbon tax scheme in a supply chain. Decis. Sci. 49 (2018) 863–900. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Mansfield, J. Rapoport, J. Schnee, S. Wagner and M. Hamburger, Research and Development in the Modern Corporation London, NY (1971). [Google Scholar]
  • M.J. Nieto and L. Santamaria, The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation 27 (2007) 367–377. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Pangarkar and J. Wu, Alliance formation, partner diversity and performance of Singapore firms. Asia Pac. J. Manage. 30 (2013) 791–807. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Radner, Monitoring cooperative agreement in a repeated principal-agent relationship. Econometrica (1981) 1127–1148. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Raz and A. Ovchinnikov, Coordinating pricing and supply of public interest goods using government rebates and subsidies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 62 (2015) 630–639. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Rees, An Introduction to Evolutionary Game Theory. UBC Department of Computer Science, Vancouver, Canada (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • I. Ritzenhofen, J.R. Birge and S. Spinler, The structural impact of renewable portfolio standards and feed-in-tariffs on electricity markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 225 (2016) 224–242. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Romer, Endogenous Technological Change. National Bureau of Economic Research (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • H. Rubinstein, Equilibrium in super games with the overtaking criterion. J. Econ. Theory 21 (1979) 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • J.A. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers 55 (1934). [Google Scholar]
  • G. Shrimali and E. Baker, Optimal feed-in tariff schedules. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 59 (2012) 310–322. [Google Scholar]
  • R.M. Solow, A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 70 (1956) 65–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Ten commodity report, Research Institute of Sharif University (RISTIP) (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • B.S. Tether, Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Res. Policy 31 (2002) 947–967. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Tzelepis and D. Skuras, The effects of regional capital subsidies on firm performance: an empirical study. J. Small Bus. Enterprise Dev. 11 (2004) 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang, Z. Zhou and A. Botterud, An evolutionary game approach to analyzing bidding strategies in electricity markets with elastic demand. Energy 36 (2011) 3459–3467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Wang, M.E. Ferguson, S. Hu and G.C. Souza, Dynamic capacity investment with two competing technologies. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 15 (2013) 616–629. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Wind and V. Mahajan, Issues and opportunities in new product development. J. Marketing Res. 34 (1997) 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Wu, The asymmetric roles of business ties and political ties in product innovation. J. Bus. Res. 64 (2011) 1151–1156. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Wu and X.Y. Chen, Leaders’ social ties, knowledge acquisition capability and firm competitive advantage. Asia Pac. J. Manage. 29 (2012) 331–350. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Yanchao, H. Zhou, Y. Yuan and H. Xue, Exploring the moral hazard evolutionary mechanism for BIM implementation in an integrated project team. Sustainability 11 (2019) 5719. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhang and H. Li, Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Manage. J. 31 (2010) 88–109. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Zhou and P. Zhou, Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China. Renew. Energy 63 (2014) 330–336. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Zhang, Z. Xu, D. Zhou and J. Cao, Waste cooking oil-to-energy under in-complete information: identifying policy options through an evolutionary game. Appl. Energy 185 (2017) 547–555. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhang, Y. Gu, M. Pan, N.H. Tran, Z. Dawy and Z. Han, Multi-Dimensional Incentive Mechanism in Mobile Crowdsourcing with Moral Hazard. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 17 (2018) 604–616. [Google Scholar]
  • W. Zhou and W. Huang, Contract designs for energy-saving product development in a monopoly. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250 (2016) 902–913. [Google Scholar]
  • Q.H. Zhu and Y.J. Dou, The evolutionary game model between governments and core enterprises in greening supply chains. Syst. Eng. Theory Prac. 27 (2007) 85–89. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.