Open Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, Number 3, May-June 2021
Page(s) 1743 - 1756
Published online 22 June 2021
  • E. Abdali and R. Fallahnejad, A bargaining game model for measuring efficiency of two-stage network DEA with nondiscretionary inputs. Int. J. Comput. Math. Comput. Syst. Theory 5 (2020) 48–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.D. Banker and R.C. Morey, The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 32 (1986) 1613–1627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.D. Banker and R.C. Morey, Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper. Res. 34 (1986) 513–521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G.B. Bi, J.J. Ding, Y. Luo and L. Liang, A new malmquist productivity index based on semi-discretionary variables with an application to commercial banks of China. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 10 (2011) 713–730. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G.B. Bi, L. Liang and L.Y. Ling, DEA models for the chain-like systems with semi-discretionary variables. Syst. Eng. Electron. 29 (2007) 2052–2055. [Google Scholar]
  • A.S. Camanho, M.C. Portela and C.B. Vaz, Efficiency analysis accounting for internal and external non-discretionary factors. Comput. Oper. Res. 36 (2009) 1591–1601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. [Google Scholar]
  • W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford and K. Tone, Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. Springer Science & Business Media (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • M.J. Farrell, The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 120 (1957) 253–281. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Golany and Y. Roll, Some extensions of techniques to handle non-discretionary factors in data envelopment analysis. J. Product. Anal. 4 (1993) 419–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.K. Hu, F.B. Liu, H.M. Chen and C.F. Hu, Network data envelopment analysis with fuzzy non-discretionary factors. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 13 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • J.M. Huguenin, Data Envelopment Analysis and non-discretionary inputs: How to select the most suitable model using multicriteria decision analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 42 (2015) 2570–2581. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Keskin and C.D. Köksal, A hybrid AHP/DEA-AR model for measuring and comparing the efficiency of airports. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 68 (2019) 524–541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Khanmohammadi and M. Kazemimanesh, Ranking of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis with non-discretionary Data. Int. J. Ind. Math. 12 (2020) 197–207. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Naghiha, R. Maddahi and A. Ebrahimnejad, An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for evaluation and ranking of production methods in industrial environments. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 31 (2019) 341–359. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Ruggiero, On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 90 (1996) 553–565. [Google Scholar]
  • H.D. Sherali and A.L. Soyster, Preemptive and nonpreemptive multi-objective programming: relationship and counterexamples. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 39 (1983) 173–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Taleb, R. Ramli and R. Khalid, Developing a two-stage approach of super efficiency slack-based measure in the presence of non-discretionary factors and mixed integer-valued data envelopment analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 103 (2018) 14–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Yahia and A. Pradhan, Multi-objective preemptive optimization of residential load scheduling problem under price and CO2 signals. Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag. (2019) 1926–1937. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Zadmirzaei, S.M. Limaei, L. Olsson and A. Amirteimoori, Assessing the impact of the external non-discretionary factor on the performance of forest management units using DEA approach. J. For. Res. 22 (2017) 144–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Zerafat Angiz L and A. Mustafa, Fuzzy interpretation of efficiency in data envelopment analysis and its application in a non-discretionary model. Knowl.-Based Syst. 49 (2013) 145–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Zerafat Angiz L, A. Mustafa, M. Ghadiri and A. Tajaddini, Relationship between efficiency in the traditional data envelopment analysis and possibility sets. Comput. Ind. Eng. 81 (2015) 140–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhang, Q. Wu and Z. Zhou, A two-stage DEA model for resource allocation in industrial pollution treatment and its application in China. J. Clean. Prod. 228 (2019) 29–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.