Open Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, Number 5, September-October 2021
Page(s) 2827 - 2860
Published online 20 September 2021
  • N. Azad, G.K. Saharidis, H. Davoudpour, H. Malekly and S.A. Yektamaram, Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: an improved Benders decomposition approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 210 (2013) 125–163. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Bertsimas and M. Sim, The price of robustness. Oper. Res. 52 (2004) 35–53. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Bertsimas, V. Gupta and N. Kallus, Data-driven robust optimization. Math. Program. 167 (2018) 235–292. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Bhattacharya, J. Geraghty, P. Young and P. Byrne, Design of a resilient shock absorber for disrupted supply chain networks: a shock-dampening fortification framework for mitigating excursion events. Prod. Plan. Control. 24 (2013) 721–742. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Chopra and M. Sodhi, Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 46 (2004) 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Dehghani, M.S. Jabalameli, A. Jabbarzadeh, M.S.J.C. Pishvaee and C. Engineering, Resilient solar photovoltaic supply chain network design under business-as-usual and hazard uncertainties. Comput. Chem. Eng. 111 (2018) 288–310. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Dehghani, M.S. Jabalameli and A. Jabbarzadeh, Robust design and optimization of solar photovoltaic supply chain in an uncertain environment. Energy 142 (2018) 139–156. [Google Scholar]
  • M.H. Dehghani Sadrabadi, R. Ghousi and A. Makui, An enhanced robust possibilistic programming approach for forward distribution network design with the aim of establishing social justice: a real-world application. J. Ind Syst. Eng. 12 (2019) 76–106. [Google Scholar]
  • M.H. Dehghani Sadrabadi, A. Jafari Nodoushan and A. Bozorgi-Amiri, Resilient supply chain under risks: a network and structural perspective. Iran. J. Manage. Stud. (2020). DOI: 10.22059/ijms.2020.306292.674139. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Eskandarpour, P. Dejax and O. Péton, Multi-directional local search for sustainable supply chain network design. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59 (2021) 412–428. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Falasca, C.W. Zobel and D. Cook, A decision support framework to assess supply chain resilience. In: Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Fattahi, K. Govindan and E. Keyvanshokooh, Responsive and resilient supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks with delivery lead-time sensitive customers. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 101 (2017) 176–200. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Garcia-Herreros, J.M. Wassick and I.E. Grossmann, Design of resilient supply chains with risk of facility disruptions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (2014) 17240–17251. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Ghavamifar, A. Makui and A.A. Taleizadeh, Designing a resilient competitive supply chain network under disruption risks: a real-world application. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 115 (2018) 87–109. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Gunantara, A review of multi-objective optimization: methods and its applications. Cogent Eng. 5 (2018) 1502242. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli and A.M.F. Fard, Sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design with discount supposition. Neural Comput. App. 31 (2019) 5343–5377. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Hamdan and A. Diabat, Robust design of blood supply chains under risk of disruptions using Lagrangian relaxation. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 134 (2020) 101764. [Google Scholar]
  • S.-M. Hosseini-Motlagh, M.R.G. Samani and F.A. Saadi, A novel hybrid approach for synchronized development of sustainability and resiliency in the wheat network. Comput. Electron. Agric. 168 (2020) 105095. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Jabbarzadeh, B. Fahimnia and S. Seuring, Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: a robust model with real world application. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 70 (2014) 225–244. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Jabbarzadeh, B. Fahimnia and F. Sabouhi, Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56 (2018) 5945–5968. [Google Scholar]
  • S.C. Leung, S.O. Tsang, W.-L. Ng and Y. Wu, A robust optimization model for multi-site production planning problem in an uncertain environment.v Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181 (2007) 224–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.T. Margolis, K.M. Sullivan, S.J. Mason and M. Magagnotti, A multi-objective optimization model for designing resilient supply chain networks. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 204 (2018) 174–185. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Mavrotas, Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 213 (2009) 455–465. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Mohammed, I. Harris, A. Soroka and R. Nujoom, A hybrid MCDM-fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for a G-Resilient supply chain network design. Comput. Ind. Eng. 127 (2019) 297–312. [Google Scholar]
  • J.M. Mulvey, R.J. Vanderbei and S.A. Zenios, Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Oper. Res. 43 (1995) 264–281. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Nikas, A. Fountoulakis, A. Forouli and H. Doukas, A robust augmented ε-constraint method (AUGMECON-R) for finding exact solutions of multi-objective linear programming problems. Oper. Res. (2020) 1–42. DOI: 10.1007/s12351-020-00574-6. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Nili, S.M. Seyedhosseini, M.S. Jabalameli and E. Dehghani, A multi-objective optimization model to sustainable closed-loop solar photovoltaic supply chain network design: a case study in Iran. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 150 (2021) 111428. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Nili, S.M. Seyedhosseini, M.S. Jabalameli and E. Dehghani, An integrated model for designing a bi-objective closed-loop solar photovoltaic supply chain network considering environmental impacts: a case study in Iran. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 13 (2021) 243–280. [Google Scholar]
  • S.V. Nooraie and M.M. Parast, Mitigating supply chain disruptions through the assessment of trade-offs among risks, costs and investments in capabilities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 171 (2016) 8–21. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Olivares-Benitez, R.Z. Ros-Mercado and J.L. González-Velarde, A metaheuristic algorithm to solve the selection of transportation channels in supply chain design. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 145 (2013) 161–172. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Pavlov, D. Ivanov, D. Pavlov and A. Slinko, Optimization of network redundancy and contingency planning in sustainable and resilient supply chain resource management under conditions of structural dynamics. Ann. Oper. Res. (2019) 1–30. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03182-6. [Google Scholar]
  • T.J. Pettit, J. Fiksel and K.L. Croxton, Ensuring supply chain resilience: development of a conceptual framework. J. Bus. Logistics 31 (2010) 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Purvis, S. Spall, M. Naim and V. Spiegler, Developing a resilient supply chain strategy during “boom” and “bust”. Prod. Plan. Control 27 (2016) 579–590. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Radhakrishnan, B. Harris and S. Kamarthi, Supply chain resiliency: a review. In: Supply Chain Risk Management. Springer (2018) 215–235. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Rezapour, R.Z. Farahani and M. Pourakbar, Resilient supply chain network design under competition: a case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 259 (2017) 1017–1035. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Sabouhi and M.S. Jabalameli, A stochastic bi-objective multi-product programming model to supply chain network design under disruption risks. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 12 (2019) 196–209. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Sabouhi, M.S. Pishvaee and M.S. Jabalameli, Resilient supply chain design under operational and disruption risks considering quantity discount: a case study of pharmaceutical supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 126 (2018) 657–672. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Sabouhi, M.S. Jabalameli, A. Jabbarzadeh and B. Fahimnia, A multi-cut L-shaped method for resilient and responsive supply chain network design. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58 (2020) 7353–7381. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Sawik, Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega 41 (2013) 259–269. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Sheffi and J.B. Rice Jr, A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 47 (2005) 41. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Shi, A review of enterprise supply chain risk management. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 13 (2004) 219–244. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Silbermayr and S. Minner, Dual sourcing under disruption risk and cost improvement through learning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250 (2016) 226–238. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Sreedevi and H. Saranga, Uncertainty and supply chain risk: the moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 193 (2017) 332–342. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Torabi, M. Baghersad and S. Mansouri, Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 79 (2015) 22–48. [Google Scholar]
  • S.A. Torabi, R. Giahi and N. Sahebjamnia, An enhanced risk assessment framework for business continuity management systems. Saf. Sci. 89 (2016) 201–218. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Vaez, F. Sabouhi and M.S. Jabalameli, Sustainability in a lot-sizing and scheduling problem with delivery time window and sequence-dependent setup cost consideration. Sustainable Cities Soc. 51 (2019) 101718. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Vaez, A. Jabbarzadeh and N. Azad, Designing a scheduling decision support system for the skin pass line: a case study of the steel finishing line. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 234 (2020) 1640–1655. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Zahiri, J. Zhuang and M. Mohammadi, Toward an integrated sustainable-resilient supply chain: a pharmaceutical case study. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 103 (2017) 109–142. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Zhalechian, S.A. Torabi and M. Mohammadi, Hub-and-spoke network design under operational and disruption risks. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 109 (2018) 20–43. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhao and G.Y. Ke, Optimizing emergency logistics for the offsite hazardous waste management. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 28 (2019) 747–765. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Zhen, D. Zhuge and J. Lei, Supply chain optimization in context of production flow network. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 25 (2016) 351–369. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.