Open Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, Number 6, November-December 2021
Page(s) 3339 - 3357
Published online 15 November 2021
  • F. Altuntas and M.S. Gök, Technological evolution of wind energy with social network analysis. Kybernetes 50 (2021) 1180–1211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Altuntas and M.S. Gök, Analysis of patent documents with utility mining: a case study of wind energy technology. Kybernetes 50 (2020) 2548–2582. [Google Scholar]
  • N.A.H. Abdullah, A.H. Ahmad, N. Zainudin and R.M. Rus, Modelling small SMEs’ failure in Malaysia. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Small Bus. 28 (2016) 101–116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Bajracharya, Public transportation and private car: a system dynamics approach in understanding the mode choice. IJSDA 5 (2016) 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Bogers, H. Chesbrough and C. Moedas, Open innovation: research, practices, and policies. California Manage. Rev. 60 (2018) 5–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Bogers, N.J. Foss and J. Lyngsie, The human side of open innovation: the role of employee diversity in firm-level openness. Res. Policy 47 (2018) 218–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Bouamama, C. Blum and J.G. Fages, An algorithm based on ant colony optimization for the minimum connected dominating set problem, Appl. Soft Comput. 80 (2019) 672–686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Brunswicker and H. Chesbrough, The adoption of open innovation in large firms: practices, measures, and risks a survey of large firms examines how firms approach open innovation strategically and manage knowledge flows at the project level. Res.-Technol. Manage. 61 (2018) 35–45. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Brunswicker and F. Ehrenmann, Managing open innovation in SMEs: a good practice example of a German software firm. IJIEM 4 (2013) 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Chang, C.W. Chang and S.H. Wu, Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 1850–1858. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.K. Chen and I.S. Chen, Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Syst. App. 37 (2010) 1981–1990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chen, Y. Chen and W. Vanhaverbeke, The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation 31 (2011) 362–373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Chen, M. Lu, X. Ming, X. Zhang and T. Zhou, Explore and evaluate innovative value propositions for smart product service system: a novel graphics-based rough-fuzzy DEMATEL method. J. Cleaner Prod. 243 (2020) 118672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H.W. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. Harvard Business Press (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • H. Chesbrough, The era of open innovation. Manage. Rev. 44 (2003) 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Chesbrough, The future of open innovation: the future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants. Res.-Technol. Manage. 60 (2017) 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Chesbrough and A.K. Crowther, Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Manage. 36 (2006) 229–236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Dahlander and D.M. Gann, How open is innovation. Res. policy 39 (2010) 699–709. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Dufour and P.E. Son, Open innovation in SMEs – towards formalization of openness. J. Innov. Manage. 3 (2015) 90–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O. Engin and A. Güçlü, A new hybrid ant colony optimization algorithm for solving the no-wait flow shop scheduling problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 72 (2018) 166–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Enkel and O. Gassmann, Driving open innovation in the front end: the IBM case. In: EURAM Conference, Paris, France (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • E. Enkel, O. Gassmann and H. Chesbrough, Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Manage 39 (2009) 311–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Faems, M. De Visser, P. Andries and B. Van Looy, Technology alliance portfolios and financial performance: value-enhancing and cost-increasing effects of open innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 27 (2010) 785–796. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Feng and R. Ma, Identification of the factors that influence service innovation in manufacturing enterprises by using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. J. Cleaner Prod. 253 (2020) 120002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Forsman and S. Temel, Innovation and business performance in small enterprises: an enterprise-level analysis. Int. J. Innov. Manage. 15 (2011) 641–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Freel and P.J. Robson, Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs. Int. Small Bus. J. 35 (2017) 578–596. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Garca-Martnez, O. Cordón and F. Herrera, A taxonomy and an empirical analysis of multiple objective ant colony optimization algorithms for the bi-criteria TSP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180 (2007) 116–148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Gershman, V. Roud and T.W. Thurner, Open innovation in Russian state-owned enterprises. Ind. Innov. 26 (2019) 199–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Greco, M. Grimaldi and L. Cricelli, Benefits and costs of open innovation: the BeCO framework. Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 31 (2019) 53–66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Han and A. Heshmati, Determinants of financial rewards from industry–university collaboration in South Korea. Int. J. Innov. Manage. 20 (2016) 1650075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Heikkilä, H. Bouwman and J. Heikkilä, From strategic goals to business model innovation paths: an exploratory study. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 25 (2018) 107–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Hu, S. Williams, R. Mason and P. Found, Knowledge management in consultancy-involved process improvement projects: cases from Chinese SMEs. Prod. Planning Control 30 (2019) 866–880. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Ibarra, J. Rueda and A. Arenas, Mapping of the challenges for the open innovation model’s implementation in service sector. J. Adv. Manage. Sci. 3 (2015) 354–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Kanso, A. Kansou and A. Yassine, Open capacitated ARC routing problem by hybridized ant colony algorithm. RAIRO: OR 55 (2021) 639–652. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • M.M. Keupp and O. Gassmann, Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Manage. 39 (2009) 331–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Lee, G. Park, B. Yoon and J. Park, Open innovation in SMEs-An intermediated network model. Res. Policy 39 (2010) 290–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Mehrjerdi and A. Nadizadeh, Using greedy clustering method to solve capacitated location routing problem with fuzzy demands. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 229 (2013) 75–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Mortara and T. Minshall, How do large multinational companies implement open innovation?. Technovation 31 (2011) 586–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Nadizadeh and H.H. Nasab, Solving the dynamic capacitated location-routing problem with fuzzy demands by hybrid heuristic algorithm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238 (2014) 458–470. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Pervan, Y. Al-Ansaari and J. Xu, Environmental determinants of open innovation in Dubai SMEs. Ind. Market. Manage. 50 (2015) 60–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Radicic and K. Djalilov, The impact of technological and non-technological innovations on export intensity in SMEs. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 26 (2019) 612–638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G. Santoro, D. Vrontis, A. Thrassou and L. Dezi, The internet of things: building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 136 (2018) 347–354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Shafiei Nikabadi and A. Hakaki, A dynamic model of effective factors on open innovation in manufacturing small and medium sized companies. IJSDA 7 (2018) 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Shafiei Nikabadi and A. Hakaki, A multi-dimensional causal model of effective factors on open innovation in manufacturing SMEs in Iran. IJABIM 10 (2019) 91–110. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Shafiei Nikabadi and A. Hakaki, Mutual relationship between supply chain, business strategy, and knowledge management in supply chain. In: Dynamic Perspectives on Globalization and Sustainable Business in Asia. IGI Global Press (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Smith, M. Busi, P. Ball and R. Van der Meer, Factors influencing an organisation’s ability to manage innovation: a structured literature review and conceptual model. Int. J. Innov. Manage. 12 (2008) 655–676. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Spithoven, W. Vanhaverbeke and N. Roijakkers, Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Bus. Econ. 41 (2013) 537–562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Stucki, Internal and external factors influencing the implementation and diffusion of the open innovation models: the case of the postal sector. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Global Postal Research and Education Network Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • W. Vanhaverbeke, N. Roijakkers, A. Lorenz and H. Chesbrough, The Importance of Connecting Open Innovation to Strategy. Springer Press (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • W.W. Wu and Y.T. Lee, Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst. App. 32 (2007) 499–507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.