EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 / No 2 (March-April 2022) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 56 2 (2022) 911-930 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 56, Number 2, March-April 2022
Page(s) 911 - 930
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022031
Published online 14 April 2022
  • M. Afsharian, H. Ahn and S.G. Harms, A review of DEA approaches applying a common set of weights: the perspective of centralized management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 294 (2021) 3–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. An, Y. Wen, J. Hu and X. Lei, A common-weight DEA model for multi-criteria ABC inventory classification with quantitative and qualitative criteria. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 53 (2019) 1775–1789. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Arana-Jiménez, M.C. Sánchez-Gil and S. Lozano, A fuzzy DEA slacks-based approach. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 404 (2022) 113180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Bai, F. Zhang and Y. Liu, Modeling fuzzy data envelopment analysis under robust input and output data. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 52 (2018) 619–643. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Barbot, Á. Costa and E. Sochirca, Airlines performance in the new market context: a comparative productivity and efficiency analysis. J. Air Transp. Manage. 14 (2008) 270–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Carrillo and J.M. Jorge, A multi-objective DEA approach to ranking alternatives. Expert Syst. App. 50 (2016) 130–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.T. Chang, H.S. Park, J.B. Jeong and J.W. Lee, Evaluating economic and environmental efficiency of global airlines: a SBM-DEA approach. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 27 (2014) 46–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chu, J. Wu, C. Chu and M. Liu, A new DEA common-weight multi-criteria decision-making approach for technology selection. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58 (2020) 3686–3700. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • I. Contreras, S. Lozano and M.A. Hinojosa, A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA. Oper. Res. 21 (2019) 2181–2201. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Cukierman and A.H. Meltzer, A theory of ambiguity, credibility, and inflation under discretion and asymmetric information. Econ. J. Econ. Soc. 54 (1986) 1099–1128. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Dubois and H. Prade, Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum, New York (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • D. Gharakhani, A. Toloie Eshlaghy, K. Fathi Hafshejani, R. Kiani Mavi and F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Common weights in dynamic network DEA with goal programming approach for performance assessment of insurance companies in Iran. Manage. Res. Rev. 41 (2018) 920–938. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Gupta, M.K. Mehlawat, A. Kumar, S. Yadav and A. Aggarwal, A credibilistic fuzzy DEA approach for portfolio efficiency evaluation and rebalancing toward benchmark portfolios using positive and negative returns. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 22 (2020) 824–843. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Gutiérrez and S. Lozano, Efficiency assessment and output maximization possibilities of European small and medium sized airports. Res. Transp. Econ. 56 (2016) 3–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hatami-Marbini and S. Saati, Efficiency evaluation in two-stage data envelopment analysis under a fuzzy environment: a common-weights approach. Appl. Soft Comput. 72 (2018) 156–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hatami-Marbini, M. Tavana, P.J. Agrell, F.H. Lotfi and Z.G. Beigi, A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting. Comput. Ind. Eng. 79 (2015) 195–203. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Heydari, H. Omrani and R. Taghizadeh, A fully fuzzy network DEA-Range Adjusted Measure model for evaluating airlines efficiency: a case of Iran. J. Air Transp. Manage. 89 (2020) 101923. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Izadikhah and A. Khoshroo, Energy management in crop production using a novel fuzzy data envelopment analysis model. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 52 (2018) 595–617. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • G.R. Jahanshahloo, F.H. Lotfi, M. Khanmohammadi, M. Kazemimanesh and V. Rezaie, Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights. Expert Syst. App. 37 (2010) 7483–7488. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.K. Jain and R. Natarajan, A DEA study of airlines in India. Asia Pac. Manage. Rev. 20 (2015) 285–292. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Kao and H.T. Hung, Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56 (2005) 1196–1203. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Kazemi, M. Tavana, M. Toloo and N.A. Zenkevich, A common weights model for investigating efficiency-based leadership in the russian banking industry. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 213–229. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Li and B. Liu, A sufficient and necessary condition for credibility measures. Int. J. Uncertainty. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 14 (2006) 527–535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Liu, Uncertainty Theory: An Introduction to its Axiomatic Foundations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • B. Liu, A survey of credibility theory. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 5 (2006) 387–408. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Liu and Y.K. Liu, Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10 (2002) 445–450. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.K. Liu and B. Liu, Fuzzy random variables: a scalar expected value operator. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 2 (2003) 143–160. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Lozano and E. Gutiérrez, A slacks-based network DEA efficiency analysis of European airlines. Transp. Planning Technol. 37 (2014) 623–637. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W.M. Lu, W.K. Wang, S.W. Hung and E.T. Lu, The effects of corporate governance on airline performance: production and marketing efficiency perspectives. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 48 (2012) 529–544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Mahla and S. Agarwal, A credibility approach on fuzzy slacks based measure (SBM) DEA model. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. Preprint. Preprint: arXiv:2102.01933.v (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Mahmoudi, A. Emrouznejad, S.N. Shetab-Boushehri and S.R. Hejazi, The origins, development and future directions of Data Envelopment Analysis approach in transportation systems. Soc. Econ. Planning Sci. 69 (2020) 100762. [Google Scholar]
  • R.K. Mavi, R.F. Saen and M. Goh, Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: a big data approach. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 144 (2019) 553–562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Merkert and D.A. Hensher, The impact of strategic management and fleet planning on airline efficiency: a random effects Tobit model based on DEA efficiency scores. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45 (2011) 686–695. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Olfat, M. Amiri, J.B. Soufi and M. Pishdar, A dynamic network efficiency measurement of airports performance considering sustainable development concept: a fuzzy dynamic network-DEA approach. J. Air Transp. Manage. 57 (2016) 272–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Omrani, Common weights data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: a robust optimization approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66 (2013) 1163–1170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Omrani and E. Soltanzadeh, Dynamic DEA models with network structure: an application for Iranian airlines. J. Air Transp. Manage. 57 (2016) 52–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Omrani, A. Alizadeh and F. Naghizadeh, Incorporating decision makers’ preferences into DEA and common weight DEA models based on the best–worst method (BWM). Soft Comput. 24 (2020) 3989–4002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Omrani, A. Alizadeh, A. Emrouznejad and T. Teplova, Data envelopment analysis model with decision makers’ preferences: a robust credibility approach. To appear in: Ann. Oper. Res. (2021) 1–38. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04262-2. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Omrani, A. Alizadeh, A. Emrouznejad and T. Teplova, A robust credibility DEA model with fuzzy perturbation degree: an application to hospitals performance. Expert Syst. App. 189 (2022) 116021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Pourrahmani, M.R. Delavar and M.A. Mostafavi, Optimization of an evacuation plan with uncertain demands using fuzzy credibility theory and genetic algorithm. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 14 (2015) 357–372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Puri, S.P. Yadav and H. Garg, A new multi-component DEA approach using common set of weights methodology and imprecise data: an application to public sector banks in India with undesirable and shared resources. Ann. Oper. Res. 259 (2017) 351–388. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Roll, W.D. Cook and B. Golany, Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis. IIE Trans. 23 (1991) 2–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.J. Sadjadi and H. Omrani, A bootstrapped robust data envelopment analysis model for efficiency estimating of telecommunication companies in Iran. Telecommun. Policy 34 (2010) 221–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K.F. See and A.A. Rashid, Total factor productivity analysis of Malaysia Airlines: lessons from the past and directions for the future. Res. Transp. Econ. 56 (2016) 42–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Soltanzadeh and H. Omrani, Dynamic network data envelopment analysis model with fuzzy inputs and outputs: an application for Iranian Airlines. Appl. Soft Comput. 63 (2018) 268–288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Sun, J. Wu and D. Guo, Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights. Appl. Math. Modell. 37 (2013) 6301–6310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Tavassoli, G.R. Faramarzi and R.F. Saen, Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using a SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input. J. Air Transp. Manage. 34 (2014) 146–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Tavassoli, A. Fathi and R.F. Saen, Developing a new super-efficiency DEA model in the presence of both zero data and stochastic data: a case study in the Iranian airline industry. Benchmarking Int. J. 28 (2020) 42–65. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Toloo, Alternative minimax model for finding the most efficient unit in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 81 (2015) 186–194. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Toloo and M. Salahi, A powerful discriminative approach for selecting the most efficient unit in DEA. Comput. Ind. Eng. 115 (2018) 269–277. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Toloo, M. Allahyar and J. Hančlová, A non-radial directional distance method on classifying inputs and outputs in DEA: application to banking industry. Expert Syst. App. 92 (2018) 495–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Wang, Z. Liu and Y. Zhang, A novel weighting method for finding common weights in DEA. Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res. 34 (2017) 1750027. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Wanke and C.P. Barros, Efficiency in Latin American airlines: a two-stage approach combining Virtual Frontier Dynamic DEA and Simplex Regression. J. Air Transp. Manage. 54 (2016) 93–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Wanke, C.P. Barros and O.R. Nwaogbe, Assessing productive efficiency in Nigerian airports using Fuzzy-DEA. Transp. Policy 49 (2016) 9–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Wanke, C.P. Barros and A. Emrouznejad, Assessing productive efficiency of banks using integrated Fuzzy-DEA and bootstrapping: a case of Mozambican banks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249 (2016) 378–389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.W. Wardana, I. Masudin and D.P. Restuputri, A novel group decision-making method by P-robust fuzzy DEA credibility constraint for welding process selection. Cogent Eng. 7 (2020) 1728057. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Yu, Y. Zhang, A. Zhang, K. Wang and Q. Cui, A comparative study of airline efficiency in China and India: a dynamic network DEA approach. Res. Transp. Econ. 76 (2019) 100746. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Yue, F. Zhang, C. Zhang, H. Zhu, Y. Tang and P. Guo, A full fuzzy-interval credibility-constrained nonlinear programming approach for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty. Agric. Water Manage. 230 (2020) 105961. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8 (1965) 338–353. [Google Scholar]
  • L.A. Zadeh, Possibility theory and its application to information analysis. In: Proc. Int. Colloq. Inf. Theory (CNRS) (1978) 173–182. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhu, Airlines performance via two-stage network DEA approach. J. CENTRUM Cathedra Bus. Econ. Res. J. 4 (2011) 260–269. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • H.J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Sets Theory and its Applications, 4th edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Zohrehbandian, A. Makui and A. Alinezhad, A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: an improvement to Kao and Hung’s approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61 (2010) 604–610. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.