Open Access
Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 56, Number 5, September-October 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 3429 - 3447 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022156 | |
Published online | 12 October 2022 |
- R.T. Lund and W.M. Hauser, Remanufacturing – an American perspective. In: 5th International Conference on Responsive Manufacturing e Green Manufacturing (ICRM), January 2010 (2010) 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Wang and B.T. Hazen, Consumer product knowledge and intention to purchase remanufactured products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181 (2016) 460–469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J.Q.F. Neto and M. Dutordoir, Mapping the market for remanufacturing: an application of “Big Data” analytics. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 230 (2020) 107807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Liu, C. Wang, L. Liu and X. Lang, Which group should governmental policies target? Effects of incentive policy for remanufacturing industry. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 1579. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- A.A. Taleizadeh, S.T.A. Niaki and N. Alizadeh-Basban, Cost-sharing contract in a closed-loop supply chain considering carbon abatement, quality improvement effort, and pricing strategy. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 2181. [Google Scholar]
- H. Qiao and Q. Su, Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 151 (2021) 102338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Örsdemir, E. Kemahloğlu-Ziya and A.K. Parlaktürk, Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manage. 23 (2014) 48–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.K. Thorn and P. Rogerson, Take it back: remanufacturing is a viable alternative to disposal of products that have outlived their usefulness–but only if engineers can unearth sound economic justifications. IIE Sol. 34 (2002) 34–40. [Google Scholar]
- M. Matsumoto and Y. Umeda, An analysis of remanufacturing practices in Japan. J. Remanuf. 1 (2011) 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.T. Hazen, R.E. Overstreet, L.A. Jones-Farmer and H.S. Field, The role of ambiguity tolerance in consumer perception of remanufactured products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135 (2012) 781–790. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Sharifi and S. Shokouhyar, Promoting consumer’s attitude toward refurbished mobile phones: a social media analytics approach. Res. Conserv. Recycling 167 (2021) 105398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Eurobarometer, Europeans’ attitudes towards the issue of sustainable consumption and production. Flash Eurobarometer 256 (2009) 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- K. White, D.J. Hardisty and R. Habib, The elusive green consumer. Harvard Bus. Rev. 11 (2019) 124–133. [Google Scholar]
- C. Michaud and D. Llerena, Green consumer behaviour: an experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products. Bus. Strategy Environ. 20 (2011) 408–420. [Google Scholar]
- C.H. Huynh, K.C. So and H. Gurnani, Managing a closed-loop supply system with random returns and a cyclic delivery schedule. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 255 (2016) 787–796. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Chai, H. Li, C.H. Lee, S.B. Tsai and H. Chen, Shareholding operation of product remanufacturing–from a sustainable production perspective. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) S1529–S1549. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- C. Franke, B. Basdere, M. Ciupek and S. Seliger, Remanufacturing of mobile phones – capacity, program and facility adaptation planning. Omega 34 (2006) 562–570. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Liu, K.W. Li, B.Y. Li, J. Huang and J. Tang, Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 124 (2019) 75–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Xia, D. Tan and B. Wang, Use of a product service system in a competing remanufacturing market. Omega 102 (2021) 102387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.H. Wu, OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product. Omega 41 (2013) 287–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.H. Wu, Product-design and pricing strategies with remanufacturing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222 (2012) 204–215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Subramanian, M.E. Ferguson and L. Beril Toktay, Remanufacturing and the component commonality decision. Prod. Oper. Manage. 22 (2013) 36–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Kleber, M. Reimann, G.C. Souza and W. Zhang, On the robustness of the consumer homogeneity assumption with respect to the discount factor for remanufactured products. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 269 (2018) 1027–1040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J.M. Chen and C.I. Chang, Dynamic pricing for new and remanufactured products in a closed-loop supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 146 (2013) 153–160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J.D. Abbey, M.G. Meloy, V.D.R. Guide Jr and S. Atalay, Remanufactured products in closed-loop supply chains for consumer goods. Prod. Oper. Manage. 24 (2015) 488–503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Huang, B. Zheng and Z. Wang, The value of information sharing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 2001–2022. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- H.S. Heese, K. Cattani, G. Ferrer, W. Gilland and A.V. Roth, Competitive advantage through take-back of used products. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164 (2005) 143–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Ferrer and J.M. Swaminathan, Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203 (2010) 370–379. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Zhang, W. Chen and Q. Li, Third-party remanufacturing mode selection for a capital-constrained closed-loop supply chain under financing portfolio. Comput. Ind. Eng. 157 (2021) 107315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Majumder and H. Groenevelt, Competition in remanufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manage. 10 (2001) 125–141. [Google Scholar]
- A. Atasu and G.C. Souza, How does product recovery affect quality choice? Prod. Oper. Manage. 22 (2013) 991–1010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Chen and F. Chen, On the competition between two modes of product recovery: remanufacturing and refurbishing. Prod. Oper. Manage. 28 (2019) 2983–3001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Garvin, Competing on the eight dimensions of quality. Harv. Bus. Rev. (1987) 101–109. [Google Scholar]
- A. Genovese, A.A. Acquaye, A. Figueroa and S.L. Koh, Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: evidence and some applications. Omega 66 (2017) 344–357. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G.D. Hatcher, W.L. Ijomah and J.F.C. Windmill, Design for remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs. J. Cleaner Prod. 19 (2011) 2004–2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W.L. Ijomah, C.A. McMahon, G.P. Hammond and S.T. Newman, Development of robust design-for-remanufacturing guidelines to further the aims of sustainable development. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45 (2007) 4513–4536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Pekkarinen and P. Ulkuniemi, Modularity in developing business services by platform approach. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 19 (2008) 84–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D.W. Steeneck and S.C. Sarin, Product design for leased products under remanufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 202 (2018) 132–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.K. Mukhopadhyay and R. Setoputro, Optimal return policy and modular design for build-to-order products. J. Oper. Manage. 23 (2005) 496–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Kim and D. Chhajed, Commonality in product design: cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 125 (2000) 602–621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P.S. Desai, Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. 20 (2001) 265–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Reimann, Y. Xiong and Y. Zhou, Managing a closed-loop supply chain with process innovation for remanufacturing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 276 (2019) 510–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K.V. Katsikopoulos and G. Gigerenzer, Behavioral operations management: a blind spot and a research program. J. Supply Chain Manage. 49 (2013) 3–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Kegui, W. Xinyu, H. Min and S. Xuefeng, Price strategies and salesforce compensation design with overconfident sales agent. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 54 (2020) 1347–1368. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- X. Su and F. Zhang, Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance. Manage. Sci. 54 (2008) 1759–1773. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Papanastasiou and N. Savva, Dynamic pricing in the presence of social learning and strategic consumers. Manage. Sci. 63 (2017) 919–939. [Google Scholar]
- L. Xia, W. Hao, J. Qin, F. Ji and X. Yue, Carbon emission reduction and promotion policies considering social preferences and consumers’ low-carbon awareness in the cap-and-trade system. J. Cleaner Prod. 195 (2018) 1105–1124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.O. Olsen, A.A. Tudoran, P. Honkanen and B. Verplanken, Differences and similarities between impulse buying and variety seeking: a personality-based perspective. Psychol. Marketing 33 (2016) 36–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Hartwig, K. Inderfurth, A. Sadrieh and G. Voigt, Strategic inventory and supply chain behavior. Prod. Oper. Manage. 24 (2015) 1329–1345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Roy, S.M. Gilbert and G. Lai, The implications of visibility on the use of strategic inventory in a supply chain. Manage. Sci. 65 (2019) 1752–1767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Hu, C. Meng, D. Xu and Y.J. Son, Three-echelon supply chain coordination with a loss-averse retailer and revenue sharing contracts. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 179 (2016) 192–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Choi and P.R. Messinger, The role of fairness in competitive supply chain relationships: an experimental study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 251 (2016) 798–813. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J.S. Frankish, R.G. Roberts, A. Coad, T.C. Spears and D.J. Storey, Do entrepreneurs really learn? Or do they just tell us that they do? Ind. Corporate Change 22 (2013) 73–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E.B. Mohamed, N. Garoui and K. Naoui, Do optimistic managers destroy firm value? J. Behav. Exp. Finance 26 (2020) 100292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Jin, X. Zhang, Y. Xiong and Y. Zhou, Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 295 (2021) 131–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Galasso and T.S. Simcoe, CEO overconfidence and innovation. Manage. Sci. 57 (2011) 1469–1484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Jiang and C. Liu, Managerial optimism in a competitive market. Prod. Oper. Manage. 28 (2019) 833–846. [Google Scholar]
- M.R. Galbreth, T. Boyac and V. Verter, Product reuse in innovative industries. Prod. Oper. Manage. 22 (2013) 1011–1033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Xu and T. Xiao, Pricing and entry strategies for competitive firms with optimistic entrant. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 29 (2021) 1159–1187. [Google Scholar]
- M. Pazoki and G. Zaccour, A mechanism to promote product recovery and environmental performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 274 (2019) 601–614. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Giutini and K. Gaudette, Remanufacturing: the next great opportunity for boosting US productivity. Bus. Horizons 46 (2003) 41–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R.C. Savaskan and L.N. Van Wassenhove, Reverse channel design: the case of competing retailers. Manage. Sci. 52 (2006) 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Raz, C.T. Druehl and V. Blass, Design for the environment: life-cycle approach using a newsvendor model. Prod. Oper. Manage. 22 (2013) 940–957. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Yan, Y. Xiong, Z. Xiong and N. Guo, Bricks vs. clicks: Which is better for marketing remanufactured products? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 242 (2015) 434–444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Ma, Y. He, R. Gu and S. Li, Sustainable supply chain management considering technology investments and government intervention. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 149 (2021) 102290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Yang, Y. Hu and L. Huang, Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 287 (2020) 480–496. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Yang, X. Hu, J. Sun and Y. Zhang, Flexible versus simple trade-in strategy for remanufacturing. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72 (2021) 2472–2489. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.