Open Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 56, Number 6, November-December 2022
Page(s) 4063 - 4081
Published online 29 November 2022
  • F. Jia, S. Yin, L. Chen and X. Chen, The circular economy in the textile and apparel industry: a systematic literature review. J. Cleaner Prod. 259 (2020) 120728. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.-J. Cai and T.-M. Choi, A United Nations’ sustainable development goals perspective for sustainable textile and apparel supply chain management. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 141 (2020) 102010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Li, L. Wang and X. Ding, Textile supply chain waste management in China. J. Cleaner Prod. 289 (2021) 125147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.M. Hawley, Understanding and improving textile recycling: a systems perspective, in Sustainable Textiles. Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles, edited by R.S. Blackburn. Woodhead Publishing (2009) 179–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation, A new textiles economy: redesigning fashion’s future. Technical report (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • P.D. Venkatraman, K. Scott and C. Liauw, Environmentally friendly and sustainable bark cloth for garment applications: evaluation of fabric properties and apparel development. Sustainable Mater. Technol. 23 (2020) e00136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Friedrich, What makes bioplastics innovative for fashion retailers? An in-depth analysis according to the triple bottom line principle. J. Cleaner Prod. 316 (2021) 128257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • V. Roy, B.S. Silvestre and S. Singh, Reactive and proactive pathways to sustainable apparel supply chains: manufacturer’s perspective on stakeholder salience and organizational learning toward responsible management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 227 (2020) 107672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Repp, M. Hekkert and J. Kirchherr, Circular economy-induced global employment shifts in apparel value chains: job reduction in apparel production activities, job growth in reuse and recycling activities. Res. Conserv. Recycling 171 (2021) 105621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Friedrich, Comparative analysis of sustainability measures in the apparel industry: an empirical consumer and market study in Germany. J. Environ. Manage. 289 (2021) 112536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Islam, R. Islam, A.H. Pitafi, L. Xiaobei, M. Rehmani, M. Irfan and M.S. Mubarak, The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: the mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Prod. Consumption 25 (2021) 123–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.-W. Ho, Does practicing CSR makes consumers like your shop more? Consumer–retailer love mediates CSR and behavioral intentions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 14 (2017) 1558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Servera-Francés and L. Piqueras-Tomás, The effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer loyalty through consumer perceived value. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 32 (2019) 66–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Global Fashion Agenda and The Boston Consulting Group, Pulse of the fashion industry. Technical report, Global Fashion Agenda & The Boston Consulting Group (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • M.E. Bubicz, A.P.F.D. Barbosa-Póvoa and A. Carvalho, Social sustainability management in the apparel supply chains. J. Cleaner Prod. 280 (2021) 124214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H&M Group, Sustainability performance report 2019. Technical report (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • H&M Group, Sustainability performance report 2020. Technical report (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Levi Strauss & Co, 2020 sustainability report. Technical report (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • K. Govindan and H. Soleimani, A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a journal of cleaner production focus. J. Cleaner Prod. 142 (2017) 371–384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T.-M. Choi, Y. Li and L. Xu, Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 146 (2013) 371–380. [Google Scholar]
  • T.-M. Choi, Optimal return service charging policy for a fashion mass customization program. Serv. Sci. 5 (2013) 56–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Chen, Z. Dong, G. Li and K. He, Remanufacturing process innovation in closed-loop supply chain under cost-sharing mechanism and different power structures. Comput. Ind. Eng. 162 (2021) 107743. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Norris, The limits of ethicality in international markets: imported second-hand clothing in India. Geoforum 67 (2015) 183–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T.-M. Choi, P.-S. Chow, C.H. Lee and B. Shen, Used intimate apparel collection programs: a game-theoretic analytical study. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 109 (2018) 44–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • V. Jain, W. O’Brien and T.P. Gloria, Improved solutions for shared value creation and maximization from used clothes: streamlined structure of clothing consumption system and a framework of closed loop hybrid business model. Cleaner Responsible Consumption 3 (2021) 100039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T.M. Rausch, D. Baier and S. Wening, Does sustainability really matter to consumers? Assessing the importance of online shop and apparel product attributes. J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 63 (2021) 102681. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Alizadeh-Basban and A.A. Taleizadeh, A hybrid circular economy – game theoretical approach in a dual-channel green supply chain considering sale’s effort, delivery time, and hybrid remanufacturing. J. Cleaner Prod. 250 (2020) 119521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Taleizadeh, M.S. Moshtagh and I. Moon, Pricing, product quality, and collection optimization in a decentralized closed-loop supply chain with different channel structures: game theoretical approach. J. Cleaner Prod. 189 (2018) 406–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Taleizadeh, N. Alizadeh-Basban and S.T. Akhavan Niaki, A closed-loop supply chain considering carbon reduction, quality improvement effort, and return policy under two remanufacturing scenarios. J. Cleaner Prod. 232 (2019) 1230–1250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.-J. Cai, T.-M. Choi and T. Zhang, Commercial used apparel collection operations in retail supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 298 (2022) 169–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Yan, F. Yao and J. Sun, Manufacturer’s cooperation strategy of closed-loop supply chain considering corporate social responsibility. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 3639–3659. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Taleizadeh, E. Sane-Zerang and T.-M. Choi, The effect of marketing effort on dual-channel closed-loop supply chain systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 48 (2018) 265–276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Taleizadeh and R. Sadeghi, Pricing strategies in the competitive reverse supply chains with traditional and e-channels: a game theoretic approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 215 (2019) 48–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Sane Zerang, A.A. Taleizadeh and J. Razmi, Analytical comparisons in a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with price and marketing effort-dependent demand: game theory approaches. Environ. Dev. Sustainability 20 (2018) 451–478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • I.M. Sandvik and W. Stubbs, Circular fashion supply chain through textile-to-textile recycling. J. Fashion Marketing Manage. Int. J. 23 (2019) 366–381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.H. Bajgiran, J. Jang, X. Fang and J.H. Peoples, A biofuel supply chain equilibrium analysis with subsidy consideration. Int. J. Energy Res. 43 (2019) 1848–1867. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Chen, L. Fang and S.-I. Ivan Su, The value of offline channel subsidy in bricks and clicks: an O2O supply chain coordination perspective. Electron. Commerce Res. 21 (2021) 599–643. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Liu, B. Ting Quan, Q. Xu and J.Y.-L. Forrest, Corporate social responsibility and decision analysis in a supply chain through government subsidy. J. Cleaner Prod. 208 (2019) 436–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Fu, X. Chen and Q. Hu, Subsidizing strategies in a sustainable supply chain. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 69 (2018) 283–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Cheng, J. Wang and B. Gong, Game-theoretic analysis of price and quantity decisions for electric vehicle supply chain under subsidy reduction. Comput. Econ. 55 (2020) 1185–1208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T.-C. Weng and C.-K. Chen, Competitive analysis of collection behavior between retailer and third-party in the reverse channel. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 50 (2016) 175–188. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Ma, Z. Zhao and H. Ke, Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226 (2013) 221–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. He, Y. He and H. Xu, Channel structure and pricing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 213 (2019) 108–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chai, H. Li, C.-H. Lee, S.-B. Tsai and H. Chen, Shareholding operation of product remanufacturing – from a sustainable production perspective. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) S1529–S1549. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Yang and X. Xu, A differential game model for closed-loop supply chain participants under carbon emission permits. Comput. Ind. Eng. 135 (2019) 1077–1090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang and Y. Zhang, Do state subsidies increase corporate environmental spending? Int. Rev. Financial Anal. 72 (2020) 101592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Majumdar, S.K. Sinha and K. Govindan, Prioritising risk mitigation strategies for environmentally sustainable clothing supply chains: insights from selected organisational theories. Sustainable Prod. Consumption 28 (2021) 543–555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Sadeghi, A.A. Taleizadeh, F.T.S. Chan and J. Heydari, Coordinating and pricing decisions in two competitive reverse supply chains with different channel structures. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 2601–2625. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Taleizadeh, S.T.A. Niaki and N. Alizadeh-Basban, Cost-sharing contract in a closed-loop supply chain considering carbon abatement, quality improvement effort, and pricing strategy. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) S2181–S2219. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Dhir, M. Sadiq, S. Talwar, M. Sakashita and P. Kaur, Why do retail consumers buy green apparel? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective. J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 59 (2021) 102398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Sadiq, K. Bharti, M. Adil and R. Singh, Why do consumers buy green apparel? The role of dispositional traits, environmental orientation, environmental knowledge, and monetary incentive. J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 62 (2021) 102643. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Guo, T.-M. Choi and B. Shen, Green product development under competition: a study of the fashion apparel industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 280 (2020) 523–538. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • K.K.-L. Moon, C. Youn, J.M.T. Chang and A.W.H. Yeung, Product design scenarios for energy saving: a case study of fashion apparel. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 146 (2013) 392–401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang, Z. Wang, B. Li, Z. Liu, X. Zhu and Q. Wang, Closed-loop supply chain models with product recovery and donation. J. Cleaner Prod. 227 (2019) 861–876. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Chen, X. Wang and H.K. Chan, Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: a power perspective. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 97 (2017) 268–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.-Y. Chen, S. Dimitrov and H. Pun, The impact of government subsidy on supply chains’ sustainability innovation. Omega 86 (2019) 42–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.