Open Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 57, Number 2, March-April 2023
Page(s) 401 - 425
Published online 15 March 2023
  • H.K. Bhargava, Retailer-driven product bundling in a distribution channel. Market. Sci. 31 (2012) 1014–1021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O. Caliskan-Demirag, Y.F. Chen and J. Li, Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207 (2010) 1321–1326. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Camerer and D. Lovallo, Overconfidence and excess entry: an experimental approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 89 (1999) 306–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Cao, Y. Tang, S. Perera and J. Zhang, Manufacturer-versus retailer-initiated bundling: implications for the supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 157 (2022) 102552. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Chen and X. Wang, Free or bundled: channel selection decisions under different power structures. Omega 53 (2015) 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  • W. Chen, Y.w. Zhou, D. Xiao and Z.R. Liu, Incentive contract design in distribution supply chain with the overconfident retailer. in ICSSSM12. IEEE (2012) 215–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Chen, F. Yang and X. Guo, Optimal bundling in a distribution channel in the presence of substitutability and complementarity. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59 (2020) 1145–1165. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Chen, G. Nan, M. Li, B. Feng and Q. Liu, Manufacturer’s online selling strategies under spillovers from online to offline sales. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2022) 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Chen, G. Nan, Q. Liu, J. Peng and J. Ming, How do consumer fairness concerns affect an e-commerce platform’s choice of selling scheme? J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commerce Res. 17 (2022) 1075–1106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Cheng, Y. Wang, X. Shi and M. Zhou, Fashion retail competition on product greenness with overconfidence. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 101–114. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Du and W. Zhao, Managing a dual-channel supply chain with fairness and channel preference. Math. Prob. Eng. 2021 (2021) 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Du, Q. Liu and G. Li, Coordinating leader-follower supply chain with sustainable green technology innovation on their fairness concerns. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14 (2017) 1357. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Du, H. Zhan, X. Zhu and X. He, The upstream innovation with an overconfident manufacturer in a supply chain. Omega 105 (2021) 102497. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Esmaeili, M.B. Aryanezhad and P. Zeephongsekul, A game theory approach in seller–buyer supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 195 (2009) 442–448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Fehr and K.M. Schmidt, A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114 (1999) 817–868. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.N. Giri, S.K. Mondal and M. Maiti, Bundle pricing strategies for two complementary products with different channel powers. Ann. Oper. Res. 287 (2020) 701–725. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Guan, T. Ye and R. Yin, Channel coordination under nash bargaining fairness concerns in differential games of goodwill accumulation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 285 (2020) 916–930. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Haitao Cui, J.S. Raju and Z.J. Zhang, Fairness and channel coordination. Manage. Sci. 53 (2007) 1303–1314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Huang, Y. Zhang and H. Fan, Research on retail channel decisions considering consumer’s fairness concern. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 23–47. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Jain, J. Hazra and T. Cheng, Sourcing under overconfident buyer and suppliers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 206 (2018) 93–109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Jena and A. Ghadge, Product bundling and advertising strategy for a duopoly supply chain: a power-balance perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 315 (2022) 1729–1753. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Jian, B. Li, N. Zhang and J. Su, Decision-making and coordination of green closed-loop supply chain with fairness concern. J. Cleaner Prod. 298 (2021) 126779. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Leng and M. Parlar, Game theoretic applications in supply chain management: a review. INFOR: Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 43 (2005) 187–220. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Li, N.C. Petruzzi and J. Zhang, Overconfident competing newsvendors. Manage. Sci. 63 (2017) 2637–2646. [Google Scholar]
  • W. Liu, D. Wang, O. Tang and D. Zhu, The impacts of logistics service integrator’s overconfidence behaviour on supply chain decision under demand surge. Eur. J. Ind. Eng. 12 (2018) 558. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Liu, H. Zhou, M. Wan and L. Liu, How does overconfidence affect decision making of the green product manufacturer? Math. Prob. Eng. 2019 (2019). DOI: 10.1155/2019/5936940. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Lou, F. Hou, X. Lou and T. Ma, Game-theoretical models of a two-echelon supply chain involving two substitutable products. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 30 (2021) 307–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Lu, P&G’s collaborative supply chain transformation. Enterprise Manage. 10 (2016) 79–80. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Meyer and V. Shankar, Pricing strategies for hybrid bundles: analytical model and insights. J. Retailing 92 (2016) 133–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D.A. Moore and P.J. Healy, The trouble with overconfidence. Psychol. Rev. 115 (2008) 502. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Pan and S. Zhou, Optimal bundling and pricing decisions for complementary products in a two-layer supply chain. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 26 (2017) 732–752. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Parsaeifar, A. Bozorgi-Amiri, A. Naimi-Sadigh and M.S. Sangari, A game theoretical for coordination of pricing, recycling, and green product decisions in the supply chain. J. Cleaner Prod. 226 (2019) 37–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X.J. Pu and R.J. Zhuge, Bilateral efforts of supply chains considering supplier’s overconfidence and fairness. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. Beijing 20 (2014) 1462–1470. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Ranjbar, H. Sahebi, J. Ashayeri and A. Teymouri, A competitive dual recycling channel in a three-level closed loop supply chain under different power structures: pricing and collecting decisions. J. Cleaner Prod. 272 (2020) 122623. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Shao and S. Li, Bundling and product strategy in channel competition. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 26 (2019) 248–269. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Sharma, Game-theoretic analysis of pricing models in a dyadic supply chain with fairness concerns. Int. J. Strat. Decis. Sci. (IJSDS) 10 (2019) 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Stremersch and G.J. Tellis, Strategic bundling of products and prices: a new synthesis for marketing. J. Marketing 66 (2002) 55–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Taleizadeh, M.S. Moshtagh and I. Moon, Optimal decisions of price, quality, effort level and return policy in a three-level closed-loop supply chain based on different game theory approaches. Eur. J. Ind. Eng. 11 (2017) 486–525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.S. Tang and R. Yin, Joint ordering and pricing strategies for managing substitutable products. Prod. Oper. Manage. 16 (2007) 138–153. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang, S. Mei and W. Zhong, Advertising or recommender systems? A game-theoretic analysis of online retailer platforms’ decision-making. Manage. Decis. Econ. 43 (2022) 2199–2132. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Wang, Z. Zhang, C. Li, L. Xu and C. You, Optimal ordering and disposing policies in the presence of an overconfident retailer: a stackelberg game. Math. Prob. Eng. 2015 (2015). DOI: 10.1155/2015/385289. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Wei, Z. Li and Z. Zou, Ordering policies and coordination in a two-echelon supply chain with nash bargaining fairness concerns. J. Manage. Anal. 4 (2017) 55–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Xiao, L. Chen, M. Xie and C. Wang, Optimal contract design in sustainable supply chain: interactive impacts of fairness concern and overconfidence. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2020) 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Yan and S. Bandyopadhyay, The profit benefits of bundle pricing of complementary products. J. Retailing Consumer Ser. 18 (2011) 355–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Yoshihara and N. Matsubayashi, Channel coordination between manufacturers and competing retailers with fairness concerns. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 290 (2021) 546–555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Zhang, C. Li, P. Du and L. Xu, Does overconfident effect affect the performance of a duopoly market? A theoretical analysis, in 2015 12th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM). IEEE (2015) 1–6. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Zhang, P. Wang, M. Wan, J. Guo and C. Luo, Interactive impacts of overconfidence and fairness concern on supply chain performance. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manage. 15 (2020) 277–294. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhao, Optimal decision-making for green supply chain based on overconfidence under the carbon emission constraint. J. Eur. Syst. Autom. 52 (2019) 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Zhijian, P. Wang, M. Wan, J. Guo and J. Liu, Supply chain decisions and coordination under the combined effect of overconfidence and fairness concern. Complexity 2020 (2020). DOI: 10.1155/2020/3056305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Zhou, Can cost sharing contracts coordinate green supply chains based on manufacturers’ overconfidence, in E3S Web of Conferences. Vol 236. EDP Sciences (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • H. Zhou, L. Liu, W. Jiang and S. Li, Green supply chain decisions and revenue-sharing contracts under manufacturers’ overconfidence. J. Math. 2022 (2022). DOI: 10.1155/2022/1035966. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.