Open Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 57, Number 2, March-April 2023
Page(s) 427 - 446
Published online 15 March 2023
  • R. Esmaeilyfard, Improving detection of web service antipatterns using crowdsourcing. J. Supercomput. 78 (2022) 6340–6370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Mohammadnia, R. Esmaeilyfard and R. Akbari, An efficient method for automatic antipatterns detection of REST web services. J. Web Eng. 20 (2021) 1761–1780. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Engel, P. Fernandez, A. Ruiz-Cortes, A. Megahed and J. Ojeda-Perez, SLA-aware operational efficiency in AI-enabled service chains: challenges ahead. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manage. 20 (2022) 199–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.R. Sanaei and F.M. Sobhani, Information technology and e-business marketing strategy. Inf. Technol. Manage. 19 (2018) 185–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Ye and B. Ma, E-business models, in Internet and Electronic Business in China: Innovation Applications. Emerald Publishing Limited (2017) 13–26. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Alsheyadi, Collaborative e-business efforts and firm performance. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manage. 71 (2022) 100–124. [Google Scholar]
  • C.S. Liao, Do E-business services enhance bank efficiency in Taiwan? Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sector 14 (2022) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • B.G. Hwang, J. Ngo and J.Z.K. Teo, Challenges and strategies for the adoption of smart technologies in the construction industry: the case of Singapore. J. Manage. Eng. 38 (2022) 05021014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Linders, C.Z.-P. Liao and C.-M. Wang, Proactive e-Governance: flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan. Govern. Inf. Q. 35 (2018) S68–S76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T.-M. Yang, L. Zheng and T. Pardo, The boundaries of information sharing and integration: a case study of Taiwan e-Government. Govern. Inf. Q. 29 (2012) S51–S60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Wang and Y. Chen, From potential users to actual users: use of e-government service by Chinese migrant farmer workers. Govern. Inf. Q. 29 (2012) S98–S111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Mayakul, P. Sa-Nga-Ngam, W. Srisawat and S. Kiattisin, A comparison of national enterprise architecture and e-government perspectives, in 2019 4th Technology Innovation Management and Engineering Science International Conference (TIMES-iCON). IEEE (2019) 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Shanks, M. Gloet, I.A. Someh, K. Frampton and T. Tamm, Achieving benefits with enterprise architecture. J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 27 (2018) 139–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Kunchala, J. Yu, S. Yongchareon and C.F. Liu, An approach to merge collaborating processes of an inter-organizational business process for artifact lifecycle synthesis. Computing 102 (2020) 951–976. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Sokiyna and M. Aqel, The role of e-business applications software in driving operational excellence: impact of departments collaboration using sustainable software. Sustainable Comput.: Inf. Syst. 28 (2020) 100445. [Google Scholar]
  • S.S. Shang, Dual strategy for managing user resistance with business integration systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31 (2012) 909–925. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D.Q. Tu, A.S.M. Kayes, W. Rahayu and K. Nguyen, IoT streaming data integration from multiple sources. Computing 102 (2020) 2299–2329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Esmaeilyfard and M. Moghisi, An incentive mechanism design for multitask and multipublisher mobile crowdsensing environment. J. Supercomput. 79 (2023) 5248–5275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Esmaeilyfard and R. Esmaili, A privacy-preserving mechanism for social mobile crowdsensing using game theory. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 33 (2022) e4517. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Shoeleh, M. Seifbarghy and D. Pishva, Modelling pricing, vertical co-op advertising and quality improvement in a non-cooperative three-echelon supply chain using game theory approach. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 53 (2019) 1937–1965. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Dhole, M.V. Thomas and K. Chandrasekaran, An efficient trust-based Game-Theoretic approach for cloud federation formation, in 2016 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS). Vol. 1 IEEE (2016) 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Hadjres, F. Belqasmi, M. El Barachi and N. Kara, A green, energy, and trust-aware multi-objective cloud coalition formation approach. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 111 (2020) 52–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Comi, L. Fotia, F. Messina, D. Rosaci and G.M.J.I.S. Sarné, A partnership-based approach to improve QoS on federated computing infrastructures. Inf. Sci. 367 (2016) 246–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Esmaeilyfard and M. Naderi, Distributed composition of complex event services in IoT network. J. Supercomput. 77 (2021) 6123–6144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Esmaeilyfard, A. Samanipour and M. Paknahad, A cloud-fog software architecture for dental CBCT dose monitoring using the DICOM structured report: automated establishment of DRL. Phys. Med.-Eur. J. Med. Phys. 89 (2021) 147–150. [Google Scholar]
  • J.P.R. Coronado and J. Altmann, Model for incentivizing cloud service federation, in International Conference on the Economics of Grids, Clouds, Systems, and Services. Springer (2017) 233–246. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Cohen and L. Echabbi, Pricing composite cloud services: the cooperative perspective, in 2014 International Conference on Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS). IEEE (2014) 335–342. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Octavian and C. Sergiu, Physical integration of heterogeneous web based data. Inf. Econ. 23 (2019) 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Sani, N.N. Pusparini, A. Octaviano, S. Noris and B. Pasupati, Integration of e-business in a technological and environmental context with TAM among Indonesian SMEs, in in 2021 9th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM). IEEE (2021) 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • A. de Jong, K. de Ruyter, D.I. Keeling, A. Polyakova and T. Ringberg, Key trends in business-to-business services marketing strategies: developing a practice-based research agenda. Ind. Market. Manage. 93 (2021) 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C.K. Gomathy and S. Rajalakshmi, A efficient business process integration and quality service for service-oriented architectures. ACADEMICIA: Int. Multi. Res. J. 12 (2022) 434–442. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Vilnai-Yavetz and O. Levina, Motivating social sharing of e-business content: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, or crowding-out effect? J. Comput. Human Behav. 79 (2018) 181–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B.Q. Al Nidawy, S. Sidek, S.A. Al-Shami and A. Elzamly, E-government trust model (egov-trust) that enhances the usage of e-government services among users in Iraq. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 98 (2020) 402–418. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Kabrilyants, B.Y. Obeidat, M. Alshurideh and R. Masadeh, The role of organizational capabilities on e-business successful implementation. Int. J. Data Network Sci. 5 (2021) 417–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.A. Oyekunle and M.A. Tiamiyu, Interrelationships of organisation and e-business strategies with e-business readiness, intensity and impact in Nigerian Universities. Heliyon 8 (2022) e09719. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Ferrell, K. Ellis, P. Kaminsky and C. Rainwater, Horizontal collaboration: opportunities for improved logistics planning. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58 (2020) 4267–4284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • I. Falagara Sigala and T. Wakolbinger, Outsourcing of humanitarian logistics to commercial logistics service providers: an empirical investigation. J. Humanitarian Logistics Supply Chain Manage. 9 (2019) 47–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Selviaridis, Who’s to blame or praise? Performance attribution challenges in outsourced service provision in supply chains. Supply Chain Manage. 21 (2016) 513–533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H.A. Mahdiraji, E. Razghandi and A. Hatami-Marbini, Overlapping coalition formation in game theory: a state-of-the-art review. Expert Syst. App. 174 (2021) 114752. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Sklab, S. Aknine, O. Shehory and A. Tari, Coalition formation with dynamically changing externalities. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 91 (2020) 103577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Hadjres, N. Kara, M. El Barachi and F. Belqasmi, An SLA-Aware cloud coalition formation approach for virtualized networks. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 9 (2021) 475–491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.U. Arif, Robot coalition formation against time-extended multi-robot tasks. Int. J. Intell. Unmanned Syst. 10 (2022) 468–481. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Luo, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, X. Chen and W. Wu, Incentive-aware micro computing cluster formation for cooperative fog computing. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 19 (2020) 2643–2657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L.H. Zhou, K. Lu and W.Y. Liu, An approach for community detection in social networks based on cooperative games theory. Expert Syst. 33 (2016) 176–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F.Y. Meng, L. Wu and J.F. Chu, Allocating the fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis in view of the Shapley value. Expert Syst. 37 (2020) e12539. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Anglano, M. Canonico, P. Castagno, M. Guazzone and M. Sereno, A game-theoretic approach to coalition formation in fog provider federations, in 2018 Third International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC). IEEE (2018) 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Bagheri, A. Ebrahimzadeh and M. Najimi, Game-theory-based lifetime maximization of multi-channel cooperative spectrum sensing in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks 26 (2020) 4705–4721. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Winter, The shapley value. Handb. Game Theory Econ. App. 3 (2002) 2025–2054. [Google Scholar]
  • D.R. Ferreira, Enterprise Systems Integration: A Process-Oriented Approach. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.-C. Chen, N.V. Long and X. Luo, Iterated strict dominance in general games. Games Econ. Behav. 61 (2007) 299–315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.