EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 57 / No 4 (July-August 2023) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 57 4 (2023) 2025-2043 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 57, Number 4, July-August 2023
Page(s) 2025 - 2043
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023059
Published online 01 August 2023
  • N. Absi, S. Dauzère-Pérès, S. Kedad-Sidhoum, B. Penz and C. Rapine, Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 227 (2013) 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Bai and M. Chen, The distributionally robust newsvendor problem with dual sourcing under carbon tax and cap-and-trade regulations. Comput. Ind. Eng. 98 (2016) 260–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Bai, J. Xu and S.C. Satyaveer, Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy. Comput. Ind. Eng. 142 (2020) 106–324. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Bai, M. Chen, Y. Nikolaidis and J. Xu, Improving sustainability and social responsibility of a two-tier supply chain investing in emission reduction technology. Appl. Math. Model. 95 (2021) 688–714. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Bai, J. Xu, Y. Gong and S.S. Chauhan, Robust decisions for regulated sustainable manufacturing with partial demand information: mandatory emission capacity versus emission tax. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 298 (2022) 874–893. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Benjaafar, Y. Li and M. Daskin, Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10 (2013) 99–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Chai, Z. Xiao, K.H. Lai and G. Zhou, Can carbon cap and trade mechanism be beneficial for remanufacturing? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 203 (2018) 311–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Chelly, I. Nouira, A.B. Hadj-Alouane and Y. Frein, A comparative study of progressive carbon taxation strategies: impact on firms’ economic and environmental performances. Int. J. Prod. Res. 60 (2021) 3476–3500. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen, M. Xu and Z.G. Zhang, A risk-averse newsvendor model under the CVaR criterion. Oper. Res. 57 (2009) 1040–1044. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Dai and W. Meng, A risk-averse newsvendor model under marketing-dependency and price-dependency. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 160 (2015) 220–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Das and S.K. Roy, Effect of variable carbon emission in a multi-objective transportation-p facility location problem under neutrosophic environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 132 (2019) 311–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Das and S.K. Roy, An approximation approach for fixed-charge transportation-p-facility location problem, in LSCM 2020: Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021) 219–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Das, S.K. Roy and G.W. Weber, An exact and a heuristic approach for the transportation-p-facility location problem. Comput. Manag. Sci. 17 (2020) 389–407. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Das, S.K. Roy and G.W. Weber, Heuristic approaches for solid transportation-p-facility location problem. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28 (2020) 939–961. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Das, S.K. Roy and G.W. Weber, Application of type-2 fuzzy logic to a multi objective green solid transportation-location problem with dwell time under carbon tax, cap, and offset policy: fuzzy versus nonfuzzy techniques, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 28 (2020) 2711–2725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Das, M. Pervin, S.K. Roy, G.W. Weber, Multi-objective solid transportation-location problem with variable carbon emission in inventory management: a hybrid approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 324 (2023) 283–309. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Dong, B. Shen, P.S. Chow, L. Yang and C.T. Ng, Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Ann. Oper. Res. 240 (2016) 509–531. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Dou and K. Cao, A joint analysis of environmental and economic performances of closed-loop supply chains under carbon tax regulation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 146 (2020) 106624. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G. Duan, F. Nur, M. Alizadeh, L. Chen, M. Marufuzzaman and J. Ma, Vessel routing and optimization for marine debris collection with consideration of carbon cap. J. Clean. Prod. 263 (2020) 121399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.Y. Fan, M. Wang and L.D. Zhao, Production-inventory and emission reduction investment decision under carbon cap-and-trade policy. RAIRO: OR 52, (2018) 1043–1067. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Ghosh, Optimisation of a production-inventory model under two different carbon policies and proposal of a hybrid carbon policy under random demand. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 14 (2021) 280–292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Ghosh, J.K. JhA and S.P. Sarmah, Optimal lot-sizing under strict carbon cap policy considering stochastic demand. Appl. Math. Model. 44 (2017) 688–704. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Krass, T. Nedorezov and A. Ovchinnikov, Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22 (2013) 1035–1055. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Kumar, B. Sarkar and A. Kumar, Fuzzy reverse logistics inventory model of smart items with two warehouses of a retailer considering carbon emissions. RAIRO: OR 55 (2021) 2285–2307. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Li, Q. Su and L. Ma, Production and transportation outsourcing decisions in the supply chain under single and multiple carbon policies. J. Clean. Prod. 141 (2017) 1109–1122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Liu and C. Hu, Study on green supply chain cooperation and carbon tax policy considering consumer’s behavior. Math. Prob. Eng. 2020 (2020) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Meng, Z. Yao, J. Nie, Y. Zhao and Z. Li, Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: effects of the power structure. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 200 (2018) 224–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.M.A. Mohammad and Z.S. Shokri, Risk-averse multi-product selective newsvendor problem with different market entry scenarios under CVaR criterion. Comput. Ind. Eng. 103 (2017) 250–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G.C. Pflug, A value-of-information approach to measuring risk in multi-period economic activity. J. Bank. Financ. 26 (2006) 1443–1471. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Qi, J. Wang and Q. Bai, Pricing decision of a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and two retailers under a carbon cap regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 151 (2017) 286–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Qi, R. Zhang and Q. Bai, Joint decisions on emission reduction and order quantity by a risk-averse firm under cap-and-trade regulation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 162 (2021) 107783. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Rami, M. Hariga and A. Shamayleh, Sustainable dynamic lot sizing models for cold products under carbon cap policy. Comput. Ind. Eng. 149 (2020) 106800. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2 (2000) 21–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Bank. Financ. 26 (2002) 1443–1471. [Google Scholar]
  • M.D. Roy and S.S. Sana, Multi-echelon green supply chain model with random defectives, remanufacturing and rework under setup cost reduction and variable transportation cost. Sādhanā 46 (2021) 211. [Google Scholar]
  • M.D. Roy and S.S. Sana, The return and remanufacturing rates in a multi-stage green supply chain system with rework, variable shipping cost and ordering cost reduction. Int. J. Syst. Sci. Oper. Logist. 10 (2023) 2113174 [Google Scholar]
  • R. Schur, J. Gönsch and M. Hassler, Time-consistent, risk-averse dynamic pricing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 277 (2019) 587–603. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.E. Schweitzer and G.P. Cachon, Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: experimental evidence. Manag. Sci. 46 (2000) 404–420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Shaw, S.K. Das and S.K. Roy, Location-allocation problem for resource distribution under uncertainty in disaster relief operations. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 82 (2022) 101232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Sun and J.K. Gao, Research on the carbon emission regulation and optimal state of market structure: based on the perspective of evolutionary game of different stages. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 2351–2366. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Sun and J. Yang, Optimal decisions for competitive manufacturers under carbon tax and cap-and-trade policies. Comput. Ind. Eng. 156 (2021) 107244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Wang, S. Dimitrov and L. Jian, Optimal inventory decisions for a risk-averse retailer when offering layaway. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 284 (2020) 108–120. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Wu, S. Zhu and R.H. Teunter, The risk-averse newsvendor problem with random capacity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 231 (2013) 328–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Xu, C.C. Chan and A. Langevin, Coping with risk management and fill rate in the loss-averse newsvendor model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195 (2018) 296–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Xu, C. Wang, Z. Miao and J. Chen, Governmental subsidy policies and supply chain decisions with carbon emission limit and consumer’s environmental awareness. RAIRO: OR 53 (2019) 1675–1689. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Xu, Z. Meng, R. Shen, M. Jiang and P. Ji, Optimal decisions for the loss-averse newsvendor problem under CVaR. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 146–159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Xue, L. Ma and H. Shen, Optimal inventory and hedging decisions with CVaR consideration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 162 (2015) 70–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Yang and W. Chen, Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharing. Omega (2017) 1–13. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.