Open Access
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 55, Number 3, May-June 2021
Page(s) 2035 - 2054
Published online 29 June 2021
  • L. Abdullah and A. Otheman, A new entropy weight for sub-criteria in interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS and its application. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. 2 (2013) 25. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Almeida-Dias, J.R. Figueira and B. Roy, Electre Tri-C: A multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3 (2010) 565–580. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Almeida-Dias, J.R. Figueira and B. Roy, A multiple criteria sorting method where each category is characterized by several reference actions: The Electre Tri-nC method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3 (2012) 567–579. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Angilella, S. Corrente and S. Greco, Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1 (2015) 172–182. [Google Scholar]
  • V. Belton and T. Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer Science & Business Media (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Corrente, S. Greco and R. Słowiński, Multiple criteria hierarchy process in robust ordinal regression. Decis. Support Syst. 3 (2012) 660674. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Corrente, S. Greco and R. Słowiński, Multiple criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega 5 (2013) 820846. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Corrente, S. Greco, M. Kadziński and R. Slowiński, Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Mach. Learn. 23 (2013) 381–422. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Corrente, S. Greco and R. Słowiński, Multiple criteria hierarchy process for ELECTRE tri methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • S. Corrente, M. Doumpos, S. Greco, R. Słowiński and C. Zopounidis, Multiple criteria hierarchy process for sorting problems based on ordinal regression with additive value functions. Ann. Oper. Res. 12 (2017) 117139. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Corrente, J.R. Figueira, S. Greco and R. Słowiński, A robust ranking method extending ELECTRE III to hierarchy of interacting criteria, imprecise weights and stochastic analysis. Omega 73 (2017) 117. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Del Vasto-Terrientes, J. Fernández-Cavia, A. Huertas, A. Moreno and A. Valls, Official tourist destination websites: hierarchical analysis and assessment with ELECTRE-III-H. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 15 (2015) 1628. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Del Vasto-Terrientes, A. Valls, R. Slowinski and P. Zielniewicz, ELECTRE-III-H: an outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria. Expert Syst. Appl. 11 (2015) 49104926. [Google Scholar]
  • J.M. Devaud, G. Groussaud and E. Jacquet-Lagreze, UTADIS: Une méthode de construction de fonctions d’utilité additives rendant compte de jugements globaux. Eur. Work. Group Multicriteria Decis. Aid Boch. (1980) 94. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Fernández-Cavia and A. Huertas-Roig, City brands and their communication through web sites: Identification of problems and proposals for improvement. In: Web Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global (2010) 1174–1297. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Figueira and B. Roy, Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (2002) 317–326. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Greco, J. Figueira and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Ghram and H.M. Frikha, Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process within ARAS method. In 2019 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) (2019) 995–1000. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Greco, V. Mousseau and R. Slowiński, Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions’. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3 (2010) 1455–1470. [Google Scholar]
  • R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. J. Wiley, New York (1976). [Google Scholar]
  • O.V. Podinovskaya and V.V. Podinovski, Criteria importance theory for multicriterial decision making problems with a hierarchical structure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • B. Roy, ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classements fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du CERO 1 (1978) 3–24. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Roy and D. Bouyssou, Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Economica Paris (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • B. Roy, Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Springer Science & Business Media (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill. Inc New York, NY (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • T.L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process: The Organization and Prioritization of Complexity, 1st edition. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • J. Simos, Evaluer l’impact sur l’environnement: une approche originale par l’analyse multicritère et la négociationIn: Evaluer l’impact sur l’environnement: une approche originale par l’analyse multicritère et la négociation. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • P. Vincke, Multicriteria Decision-aid. John Wiley & Sons (1992). [Google Scholar]
  • J.P. Vincke and P. Brans, A preference ranking organization method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag. Sci. 6 (1985) 647–656. [Google Scholar]
  • W. Yu, ELECTRE TRI: Aspects méthodologiques et manuel d’utilisation. Document du LAMSADE. Paris : Université de Paris-Dauphine, Working Paper (1992). [Google Scholar]
  • E.K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, A new Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • M. Zeleny, Multiple Criteria Decision Making Kyoto 1975. Springer Science & Business Media (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos, Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (2002) 229–246. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.