EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 / No 2 (March-April 2022) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 56 2 (2022) 529-564 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 56, Number 2, March-April 2022
Page(s) 529 - 564
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022003
Published online 25 March 2022
  • M. Armstrong, Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econ. 37 (2006) 668–691. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Arya and B. Mittendorf, The changing face of distribution channels: partial forward integration and strategic investments. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22 (2013) 1077–1088. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Arya, B. Mittendorf and D.E.M. Sappington, The bright side of supplier encroachment. Mark. Sci. 26 (2007) 651–659. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Belleflamme, M. Peitz, Price disclosure by two-sided platforms, Int. J. Ind. Organ. 67 (2019) 102529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Boudreau, Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. Devolving control. Manage. Sci. 56 (2010) 1849–1872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Brandenburg and T. Rebs, Sustainable supply chain management: a modeling perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 229 (2015) 213–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Cattani, W. Gilland, H.S. Heese and J. Swaminathan, Boiling frogs: pricing strategies for a manufacturer adding a direct channel that competes with the traditional channel. Prod. Oper. Manag. 15 (2006) 40–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chai, H. Li, W. Yan and Y. Li, Should a retailer sell its own extended warranties or resell those from the manufacturer when confronting supplier encroachment? J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72 (2020) 2046–2058. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chai, W. Yan, Y. Li, M. Palmer and Q. Huang, Selling vertically differentiated products under one channel or two? A quality segmentation model for differentiated distribution channels. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 71 (2020) 1180–1198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Chen, Salesforce incentives, market information, and production/inventory planning, Manage. Sci. 51 (2005) 60–75. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Chen, B. Li and H. Huang, Decision policies on players’ different risk combination under supplier encroachment. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 54 (2020) 1057–1075. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chen, W. Zhang and Z. Liu, Joint pricing, services and quality decisions in a dual-channel supply chain. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 54 (2020) 1041–1056. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • W.Y.K. Chiang, D. Chhajed and J.D. Hess, Direct-marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Manage. Sci. 49 (2003) 1–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Chu and P. Manchanda, Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Mark. Sci. 35 (2016) 870–893. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.T. Coughlan, Chapter 13 salesforce compensation: a review of MS/OR advances. Handb. Oper. Res. Manage. Sci. 5 (1993) 611–651. [Google Scholar]
  • P.S. Desai, Quality segmentation in spatial markets: when does cannibalization affect product line design? Mark. Sci. 20 (2001) 265–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Ha, X. Long and J. Nasiry, Quality in supply chain encroachment. M&SOM-Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 18 (2016) 280–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hagiu, Merchant or two-sided platform?, Rev. Netw. Econ. 6 (2007) 115–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Haviv, Y. Huang, N. Li, Intertemporal demand spillover effects on video game platforms, Manage. Sci. 66 (2020) 4788–4807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Jiang, K. Jerath and K. Srinivasan, Firm strategies in the “mid tail” of platform-based retailing. Mark. Sci. 30 (2011) 757–775. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Li and Y. Zhang, More market awareness, more profit? Competitive environments, business expansions, and two-sided markets. Manag. Decis. Econ. 42 (2021) 249–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Li, S. Mallik and D. Chhajed, Design of extended warranties in supply chains under additive demand. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21 (2012) 730–746. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Li, S.M. Gilbert and G. Lai, Supplier encroachment under asymmetric information. Manage. Sci. 60 (2013) 449–462. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Li, S.M. Gilbert and G. Lai, Supplier encroachment as an enhancement or a hindrance to nonlinear pricing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 24 (2015) 89–109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Lin, S. Li and A. Whinston, Innovation and price competition in a two-sided market. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 28 (2011) 171–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Liu, S. Gupta and Z.J. Zhang, Note on self-restraint as an online entry-deterrence strategy. Manage. Sci. 52 (2006) 1799–1809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Mantin, H. Krishnan and T. Dhar, The strategic role of third-party marketplaces in retailing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 23 (2014) 1937–1949. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D.P. McIntyre and A. Srinivasan, Networks, platforms, and strategy: emerging views and next steps. Strateg. Manage. J. 38 (2017) 141–160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Mukhopadhyay, X. Su and S. Ghose, Motivating retail marketing effort: optimal contract design. Prod. Oper. Manag. 18 (2009) 197–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E. Ofek, Z. Katona and M. Sarvary, “Bricks and Clicks”: the impact of product returns on the strategies of multichannel retailers. Mark. Sci. 30 (2011) 42–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K.F. Park, R. Seamans and F. Zhu, Homing and platform responses to entry: historical evidence from the U.S. Newspaper industry. Strateg. Manage. J. 42 (2021) 684–709. [Google Scholar]
  • J.-C. Rochet and J. Tirole, Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 1 (2003) 990–1029. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.C. Savaskan, S. Bhattacharya and L.N.V. Wassenhove, Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manage. Sci. 50 (2004) 239–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Sriram, P. Manchanda, M.E. Bravo, J. Chu, L. Ma, M. Song, S. Shriver and U. Subramanian, Platforms: a multiplicity of research opportunities. Mark. Lett. 26 (2015) 141–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statista, Percentage of paid units sold by third-party sellers on amazon platform as of 4th quarter 2016. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00147.x (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • X. Sun, W. Tang, J. Chen, S. Li and J. Zhang, Manufacturer encroachment with production cost reduction under asymmetric information. Transp. Res. Pt. e-Logist. Transp. Rev. 128 (2019) 191–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Sun, R.H. Teunter, M.Z. Babai and G. Hua, Optimal pricing for ride-sourcing platforms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 278 (2019) 783–795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Tsay and N. Agrawal, Channel conflict and coordination in the e-commerce age. Prod. Oper. Manag. 13 (2004) 93–110. [Google Scholar]
  • R.K. Tyagi, Technological advances, transaction costs, and consumer welfare. Mark. Sci. 23 (2004) 335–344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Xiong, W. Yan, K. Fernandes, Z.-K. Xiong and N. Guo, “Bricks vs. Clicks”: The impact of manufacturer encroachment with a dealer leasing and selling of durable goods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 217 (2012) 75–83. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • D.-H. Yoon, Supplier encroachment and investment spillovers. Prod. Oper. Manag. 25 (2016) 1839–1854. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.