Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 56, Number 6, November-December 2022
Page(s) 3871 - 3893
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022157
Published online 11 November 2022
  • B. Chekima, S.A.W.S.K. Wafa, O.A. Igau, S. Chekima and S.L. Sondoh Jr., Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: Does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing? J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016) 3436–3450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Yang and T. Xiao, Pricing and green level decisions of a green supply chain with governmental interventions under fuzzy uncertainties. J. Clean. Prod. 149 (2017) 1174–1187. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Paul and B.C. Giri, Green sustainable supply chain under cap and trade regulation involving government introspection. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 769–794. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S.V.S. Padiyar, V. Vandana, N. Bhagat, S.R. Singh and B. Sarkar, Joint replenishment strategy for deteriorating multi-item through multi-echelon supply chain model with imperfect production under imprecise and inflationary environment. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 3071–3096. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Panda, N.M. Modak and L. Eduardo Cardenas-Barron, Coordinating a socially responsible closed-loop supply chain with product recycling. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 188 (2017) 11–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.N. Khan, Making sense of the black box: An empirical analysis investigating strategic cognition of CSR strategists in a transitional market. J. Clean. Prod. 196 (2018) 916–926. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Song, X. Yang and K. Yu, How do supply chain network and SMEs’ operational capabilities enhance working capital financing? An integrative signaling view. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 220 (2020) 107447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Poussing, Does corporate social responsibility encourage sustainable innovation adoption? Empirical evidence from Luxembourg. Corp. Soc. Responsib. and Environ. Manag. 26 (2019) 681–689. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y.-H. Li and J.-W. Huang, The moderating role of relational bonding in green supply chain practices and performance. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 23 (2017) 290–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Li, M. Zhu, Y. Jiang and Z. Li, Pricing policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016) 2029–2042. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Luthra, K. Govindan, D. Kannan, S.K. Mangla and C.P. Garg, An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 140 (2017) 1686–1698. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Yang, P. Ding, G. Wang and X. Wu, Green investment in a supply chain based on price and quality competition. Soft Computing 24 (2020) 2589–2608. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Chen, X. Wang and M. Zhou, Firms’ Green R&D Cooperation behaviour in a supply chain: Technological spillover, power and coordination. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 218 (2019) 118–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Zhu and Y. He, Green product design in supply chains under competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258 (2017) 165–180. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang and H. Song, A game theoretic strategic model for understanding the online-offline competition and fairness concern under community group buying. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. (2022). DOI: 10.3934/jimo.2022012 [Google Scholar]
  • M. Sinayi and M. Rasti-Barzoki, A game theoretic approach for pricing, greening, and social welfare policies in a supply chain with government intervention. J. Clean. Prod. 196 (2018) 1443–1458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Sun, Y. Wan, L. Zhang and Z. Zhou, Evolutionary game of the green investment in a two-echelon supply chain under a government subsidy mechanism. J. Clean. Prod. 235 (2019) 1315–1326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.-B. Jamali and M. Rasti-Barzoki, A game theoretic approach for green and non-green product pricing in chain-to-chain competitive sustainable and regular dual-channel supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 170 (2018) 1029–1043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Song and X. Gao, Green supply chain game model and analysis under revenue-sharing contract. J. Clean. Prod. 170 (2018) 183–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Toktas-Palgut, An integrated contract for coordinating a three-stage green forward and reverse supply chain under fairness concerns. J. Clean. Prod. 279 (2021) 123735. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Wang, W. Wang and R. Huang, Supply chain enterprise operations and government carbon tax decisions considering carbon emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 152 (2017) 271–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen, Y. Wang, D. Hu and Z. Zhou, Government R&D subsidies, information asymmetry, and the role of foreign investors: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment on the Shanghai-Hong Kong stock connect. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 158 (2020) 120162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Genovese, J. Morris, C. Piccolo and S.C.L. Koh, Assessing redundancies in environmental performance measures for supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 167 (2017) 1290–1302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Qin and Y. Shao, Supply chain decisions under asymmetric information with cost and fairness concern. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 13 (2019) 1347–1366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Ji, Z. Zhang and L. Yang, Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 187 (2017) 68–84. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hafezalkotob, Modelling intervention policies of government in price-energy saving competition of green supply chains. Comput. Ind. Eng. 119 (2018) 247–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Shao, J. Yang and M. Zhang, Subsidy scheme or price discount scheme? Mass adoption of electric vehicles under different market structures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262 (2017) 1181–1195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.R. Madani and M. Rasti-Barzoki, Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: A game-theoretic approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 105 (2017) 287–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhao and N. Sun, Government subsidies-based profits distribution pattern analysis in closed-loop supply chain using game theory. Neural Comput. Appl. 32 (2020) 1715–1724. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Tharani and R. Uthayakumar, A novel approach to safety stock management in an integrated supply chain with controllable lead time and ordering cost reduction using present value. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 54 (2020) 1327–1346. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Li, V. Jayaraman, A. Paulraj and K.-C. Shang, Proactive environmental strategies and performance: Role of green supply chain processes and green product design in the Chinese high-tech industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54 (2016) 2136–2151. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hafezalkotob, Direct and indirect intervention schemas of government in the competition between green and non-green supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 170 (2018) 753–772. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Yu, X. Han and G. Hu, Optimal production for manufacturers considering consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 182 (2016) 397–408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wu, X. Zhang and J. Chen, Cooperation of green R&D in supply chain with downstream competition. Comput. Ind. Eng. 160 (2021) 107571. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Zhang and H.M.A.U. Yousaf, Green supply chain coordination considering government intervention, green investment, and customer green preferences in the petroleum industry. J. Clean. Prod. 246 (2020) 118984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Wu, B. Xu and D. Zhang, Closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium model with subsidy on green supply chain technology investment. Sustainability 11 (2019) 4403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Qu, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhang, M.I.M. Wahab, G. Zhang and Y. Ye, Optimal strategy for a green supply chain considering shipping policy and default risk. Comput. Ind. Eng. 131 (2019) 172–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Ma, J. Shang and H. Wang, Enhancing corporate social responsibility: contract design under information asymmetry. Omega – Int. J. Manag. Sci. 67 (2017) 19–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Shen, T.-M. Choi and S. Minner, A review on supply chain contracting with information considerations: information updating and information asymmetry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 4898–4936. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Du, H. Shu and Z. Xia, The control strategies for information asymmetry problems among investing institutions, investors, and entrepreneurs in venture capital. Front. Psychol. 11 (2020) 1579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Lai, H. Yang, E. Cao, D. Qiu and J. Qiu, Optimal decisions for a dual-channel supply chain under information asymmetry. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 14 (2018) 1023–1040. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Li, Q. Su and K.K. Lai, The research on abatement strategy for manufacturer in the supply chain under information asymmetry, J. Clean. Prod. 236 (2019) 117514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Hu, Y. Peng, C. Guo, D. Cai and P. Su, Dynamic incentive mechanism design for recycling construction and demolition waste under dual information asymmetry. Sustainability 11 (2019) 2493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.A. Raza, Supply chain coordination under a revenue-sharing contract with corporate social responsibility and partial demand information. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 205 (2018) 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Liu, J. Li, B.-t. Quan and J.-b. Yang, Decision analysis and coordination of two-stage supply chain considering cost information asymmetry of corporate social responsibility. J. Clean. Prod. 228 (2019) 1073–1087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Liu, B.-T. Quan, Q. Xu and J.Y.-L. Forrest, Corporate social responsibility and decision analysis in a supply chain through government subsidy. J. Clean. Prod. 208 (2019) 436–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Wu, K. Li and T. Shi, Supply chain coordination with two-part tariffs under information asymmetry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55 (2016) 2575–2589. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.