Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 57, Number 5, September-October 2023
Page(s) 2411 - 2434
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023119
Published online 19 September 2023
  • Q. Bai, J. Xu and S.S. Chauhan, Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy. Comput. Ind. Eng. 142 (2020) 106324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N. Bakshi, S.H. Kim and N. Savva, Signaling new product reliability with after-sales service contracts. Manage. Sci. 61 (2015) 1812–1829. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Brandenburg, K. Govindan, J. Sarkis and S. Seuring, Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233 (2014) 299–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G.P. Cachon and M.A. Lariviere, Contracting to assure supply: how to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Manage. Sci. 47 (2001) 629–646. [Google Scholar]
  • B.K. Dey, J. Park and H. Seok, Carbon-emission and waste reduction of a manufacturing-remanufacturing system using green technology and autonomated inspection. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 2801–2831. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Ding, Q. Zhao, Z. An, J. Xu and Q. Liu, Pricing strategy of environmental sustainable supply chain with internalizing externalities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 170 (2015) 563–575. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Gao, L. Guo and A. Orsdemir, Dual-channel distribution: the case for cost information asymmetry. Prod. Oper. Manage. 30 (2020) 494–521. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Hong and X. Guo, Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities. Omega 83 (2019) 155–166. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Hu and A. Qi, Optimal procurement mechanisms for assembly. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 20 (2018) 655–666. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Jiang, L. Tian, Y. Xu and F. Zhang, To share or not to share: demand forecast sharing in a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 35 (2016) 800–809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Lai, Y. Tao, F. Wang and Z. Zou, Sustainability investment in maritime supply chain with risk behavior and information sharing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 218 (2019) 16–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Li and J. Zhou, A horizontal capacity reservation game under asymmetric information. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2018) 1103–1118. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Li, S.M. Gilbert and G. Lai, Supplier encroachment as an enhancement or a hindrance to nonlinear pricing. Prod. Oper. Manage. 24 (2014) 89–109. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Li, S.M. Gilbert and G. Lai, Supplier encroachment under asymmetric information. Manage. Sci. 60 (2014) 449–462. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Li, L. Li, T.M. Choi and S.P. Sethi, Green supply chain management in chinese firms: innovative measures and the moderating role of quick response technology. J. Oper. Manage. 66 (2019) 958–988. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Li, M. Liu, Y. Bian and S.P. Sethi, Guarding against disruption risk by contracting under information asymmetry. Decis. Sci. 51 (2020) 1521–1559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • G. Li, H. Wu, S.P. Sethi and X. Zhang, Contracting green product supply chains considering marketing efforts in the circular economy era. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 234 (2021) 108041. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Löoffler, T. Pfeiffer and G. Schneider, Controlling for supplier switching in the presence of real options and asymmetric information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223 (2012) 690–700. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Mondal and B.C. Giri, Investigating strategies of a green closed-loop supply chain for substitutable products under government subsidy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 39 (2021) 253–276. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Ni, J. Zhao and L.K. Chu, Supply contracting and process innovation in a dynamic supply chain with information asymmetry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 288 (2021) 552–562. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Pal and A. Sarkar, Optimal strategies of a dual-channel green supply chain with recycling under retailer promotional effort. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 415–431. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Sarkar, M. Sarkar, B. Ganguly and L.E. Cárdenas-Barrón, Combined effects of carbon emission and production quality improvement for fixed lifetime products in a sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 231 (2021) 107867. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.C. Savaskan, S. Bhattacharya and L.N.V. Wassenhove, Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manage. Sci. 50 (2004) 239–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.A. Taleizadeh, S.T.A. Niaki and N. Alizadeh-Basban, Cost-sharing contract in a closed-loop supply chain considering carbon abatement, quality improvement effort, and pricing strategy. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) S2181–S2219. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Tian, G. Sošić and L. Debo, Manufacturers’ competition and cooperation in sustainability: stable recycling alliances. Manage. Sci. 65 (2019) 4733–4753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Xiao and D. Yang, Risk sharing and information revelation mechanism of a one-manufacturer and one-retailer supply chain facing an integrated competitor. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196 (2009) 1076–1085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Xu, N. Shi, S.h. Ma and K.K. Lai, Contracting with an urgent supplier under cost information asymmetry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206 (2010) 374–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Zhao, D. Wang, A. Younas and B. Zhang, Coordination of closed-loop supply chain considering loss-aversion and remanufactured products quality control. Ann. Oper. Res. (2022). DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04619-1. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Zheng, K. Wen, L. Jin and X. Hong, Alliance or cost-sharing? recycling cooperation mode selection in a closed-loop supply chain. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 32 (2022) 942–955. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhou, R. Zhao and W. Wang, Pricing decision of a manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain with asymmetric information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 278 (2019) 809–820. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.