Open Access
| Issue |
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 58, Number 2, March-April 2024
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 1359 - 1374 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024031 | |
| Published online | 29 March 2024 | |
- A. Arantes, A. Frias and L. Ferreira, Application of a purchasing portfolio model to define medicine purchasing strategies: an empirical study. Soc.-Econ. Planning Sci. 84 (2022) 101318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Armstrong and D. Kotler, Principles of Marketing. Pearson Australia Publication (2015). [Google Scholar]
- C. Bai, S. Kusi-Sarpong, H. Badri Ahmadi and J. Sarkis, Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decision-support approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 22 (2019) 7046–7067. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Bensaou, Application of buyer–supplier relationships. Sloan Manage. Rev. 40 (1999) 32–35. [Google Scholar]
- S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operation. Pearson Education Inc. Prentice Hall, NJ (2013). [Google Scholar]
- T. Ekstrom, P. Hillelofth and P. Skoglund, Application a purchasing portfolio model for defense procurement – a Delphi study of Swedish defense authorities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 223 (2021) 107996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Fitzsimmon and M. Fitzsimmon, Service Management: Operations, Strategy, Information Technology. Mc Graw-Hill Education Publication. (2011). [Google Scholar]
- M. Formentini, L.M. Ellram, M. Boem and G. Da Re, Finding true north: design and implantation of a strategic sourcing framework. J. Ind. Market. Manage. 50 (2019) 182–197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Fornell and D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18 (1981) 39–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C.J. Gelderman and A.J. Van Weel, Purchasing portfolio models: a critique and update. J. Supply Chain Manage. 3 (2005) 19–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Ghanbarizadeh, J. Heydari, J. Razmi and A. Bozorgi-Amiri, A purchasing portfolio model for the commercial construction industry: a case study in a mega mall. Prod. Planning Control 15 (2019) 1283–1304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Haywood-Farmer and J. Nollet, Service Plus: Effective Service Management. Morin, Boucherville, Québec (1991). [Google Scholar]
- A. Hosseininasab and A. Ahmadi, Selecting a supplier portfolio with value development and risk consideration. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1 (2015) 146–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Johnston and G. Clark, Service Operation Management. Prentice Hall (2008). [Google Scholar]
- P. Kotler, Application Management: Analysis, Planning and Control. Prentice Hall International Editions (1976). [Google Scholar]
- L. Kovac-Alvarado, C. Rivera-Gomez and E. Avalos, Application of the BPM-Kraljic model to improve supply management in an agro-industrial MSE, Application Proceedings of the 7th North American International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, USA (2022). [Google Scholar]
- P. Kraljic, Application must become supply management. Harvard Bus. Rev. 5 (1983) 109–118. [Google Scholar]
- L. Luukkainen and A.K. Kahkonen, Developing the applications model for the Kraljic purchasing portfolio. Int. J. Procurement Manage. 2 (2023) 177–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Mersha and V. Adlkhah, Attributes of service quality: consumers perspective. Int. J. Ser. Ind. Manage. 3 (1992) 34–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Munter, Portfolio models in strategic service purchasing. Master thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology (2019). [Google Scholar]
- J.G. Murray, Local government and private sector purchasing strategy: a comparative study. Eur. J. Purchasing Supply Manage. 2 (2001) 91–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R.P. Olsen and L.M. Ellram, A portfolio approach to supplier relationships. Ind. Marketing Manage. 2 (1997) 101–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Perdana and D. Mulyono, Purchasing strategies in the Kraljic portfolio matrix: a case study in open pit coal mining. Indonesian Mining Prof. J. 3 (2021) 45–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Rezaei and H. Fallah Lajimi, Segmentation suppliers and suppliers: bringing together purchasing portfolio matrix and the supplier portfolio matrix. Int. J. Logistic Res. Appl. 18 (2018) 419–436. [Google Scholar]
- J. Rezaei and R. Ortt, A multi-variable approach to supplier segmentation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 16 (2012) 4593–4611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Rezaei and R. Ortt, Supplier segmentation using fuzzy logic. J. Ind. Marketing Manage. 4 (2013) 507–517. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Scott and R. Westbrook, New strategic tools for supply chain management. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 21 (1991) 23–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Tip, F.G.S. Vos, E. Peters and V. Delke, A Kraljic and competitive rivalry perspective on hospital procurement during a pandemic (COVID-19): a Dutch case study. J. Publ. Procurement 22 (2022) 64–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.M. Wagner and J.L. Johnson, Configuration and managing strategic supplier portfolio. J. Ind. Marketing Manage. 8 (2004) 717–730. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A.S. Yalcin, H.S. Kilic and E. Cevikcan, A novel strategy segmentation methodology integrating Kraljic portfolio metrics and supplier relationship model: a case study from machinery industry. Benchmarking: Int. J. (2023). DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-03-2023-0197. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Ye, Application investigation of Kraljic portfolio matrix. J. Supply Chain Oper. Manage. 19 (2021) 153–177. [Google Scholar]
- K.R. Yin, Applications of Case Study. Sage Publication, London (2012). [Google Scholar]
- M. Zemmy and R. Satiyowati, Strategic framework supply chain through Kraljic purchasing portfolio in O&M powerplant company, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing (2021). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.