EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 58 / No 4 (July-August 2024) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 58 4 (2024) 3569-3596 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 58, Number 4, July-August 2024
Page(s) 3569 - 3596
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024124
Published online 02 September 2024
  • H. Barman, M. Pervin, S.K. Roy and G.-W. Weber, Analysis of a dual-channel green supply chain game-theoretical model under carbon policy. Int. J. Syst. Sci. Oper. Logistics 10 (2023) 2242770. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Barman, S.K. Roy, L. Sakalauskas and G.-W. Weber, Inventory model involving reworking of faulty products with three carbon policies under neutrosophic environment. Adv. Eng. Inf. 57 (2023) 102081. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Benjaafar, G.W. Kong, X. Li and C. Courcoubrtis, Peer-to-peer product sharing: implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Manage. Sci. 65 (2018) 477–493. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Biswas, A. Raj and S.K. Srivastava, Supply chain channel coordination with triple bottom line approach. Transp. Res. Part E 115 (2018) 213–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Chatterjee, C. Ranjan and V. Demetris, Investigating the impacts of microlevel CSR activities on firm sustainability: mediating role of CSR performance and moderating role of top management support. Cross Cultural Strategic Manage. 30 (2023) 123–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Das and S.K. Roy, Effect of variable carbon emission in a multi-objective transportation-p-facility location problem under neutrosophic environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 132 (2019) 311–324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Das, M. Pervin, S.K. Roy and G.W. Weber, Multi-objective solid transportation-location problem with variable carbon emission in inventory management: a hybrid approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 324 (2023) 283–309. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • L.R. Deng, J. Tan and J.W. Dai, Analzsis of decision-making in a green supply chain under different carbon tax policies. Mathematics 11 (2023) 4631. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B.K. Dey, J. Park and H. Seok, Carbon-emission and waste reduction of a manufacturing–remanufacturing system using green technology and autonomated inspection. Oper. Res. 56 (2022) 2801–2831. [Google Scholar]
  • B.K. Dey, I. Yilmaz and H. Seok, A sustainable supply chain integrated with autonomated inspection, flexible eco-production, and smart transportation. Processes 10 (2022) 1775. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B.K. Dey, A. Datta and B. Sarkar, Effectiveness of carbon policies and multi-period delay in payments in a global supply chain under remanufacturing consideration. J. Clean. Prod. 402 (2023) 136539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.A. Dzikriansyah, I. Masudin, F. Zulfikarijah, M. Jihadi and R.D. Jatmiko, The role of green supply chain management practices on environmental performance: a case of indonesian small and medium enterprises. Clean. Logistics Supply Chain 6 (2023) 100100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B.K. Giri and S.K. Roy, Neutrosophic multi-objective green four-dimensional fixed-charge transportation problem. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 13 (2022) 3089–3112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B.K. Giri, S.K. Roy and M. Deveci, Fuzzy robust flexible programming with Me measure for electric sustainable supply chain. Appl. Soft Comput. 145 (2023) 110614. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B.K. Giri, S.K. Roy and M. Deveci, Projection based regret theory on three-way decision model in probabilistic interval-valued q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy set and its application to medicine company. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56 (2023) S3617–S3649. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Guan, X. Zhang, M. Zhou and Y. Dan, Demand information sharing in competing supply chains with manufacturer-provided service. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 220 (2020) 107450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Guo, T.M. Choi and B. Shen, Green product development under competition: a study of the fashion apparel industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 280 (2020) 523–538. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Gyöngyi, Corporate environment responsibility in the supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 16 (2008) 1571–1578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Han, Z.X. Yu and J. Li, Corporate social responsibility, product market competition, and product market performance. Int. Rev. Econ. Finan. 56 (2018) 75–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z.F. Hong and X.L. Guo, Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities. Omega 83 (2018) 155–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Hussain, K. Abbass, M. Usman, M. Rehan and M. Asif, Exploring the mediating role of environmental strategy, green innovations, and transformational leadership: the impact of corporate social responsibility on environmental performance. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 (2022) 76864–76880. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • M.J. Hutchins and J.W. Sutherland, An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J. Clean. Prod. 16 (2008) 1688–1698. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M.-B. Jamali and M. Rasti-Barzoki, A game theoretic approach for green and non-green product pricing in chain-to-chain competitive sustainable and regular dual-channel supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 170 (2018) 1029–1043 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Johari and S.M. Hosseini-Motlagh, Coordination contract for a competitive pharmaceutical supply chain considering corporate social responsibility and pricing decisions. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 54 (2019) 1515–1535. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Khosroshahi, M.R. Barzoki and S.R. Hejazi, A game theoretic approach for pricing decisions considering CSR and a new consumer satisfaction index using transparency-dependent demand in sustainable supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 208 (2019) 1065–1080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • P. Kouvelis and W. Zhao, Supply chain contract design under financial constraints and bankruptcy costs. Manage. Sci. 62 (2016) 2341–2357. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Leppelt, K. Foerstl and E. Hartmann, Corporate social responsibility in buyer–supplier relationships: Is it beneficial for top-tier suppliers to market their capability to ensure a responsible supply chain? BuR – Bus. Res. 6 (2013) 126–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Li and J. Chen, Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 202 (2018) 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Li, Q. Tan and W.R. Liu, Game theoretical perspectives on pricing decisions in asymmetric competing supply chains. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2020 (2020) 9352013. [Google Scholar]
  • C.H. Liao, An analysis of strategies for adopting blockchain in green supply chains under corporate social responsibility. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 (2023) 81189–81205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Liu and Z. Xu, Stackelberg game models between two competitive retailers in fuzzy decision environment. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 13 (2014) 33–48. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Z.G. Liu, T.D. Anderson and J.M. Cruz, Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218 (2012) 602–613. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Liu, G.S. Cai and A.A. Tsay, Advertising in asymmetric competing supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manage. 23 (2014) 1845–1858. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Liu, B.T. Quan, Q. Xu and J.Y.-L. Forrest, Corporate social responsibility and decision analysis in a supply chain through government subsidy. J. Clean. Prod. 208 (2019) 436–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Luthra, D. Garg and A. Haleem, An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: an Indian perspective. Resour. Policy 46 (2015) 37–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.R. Madani and M. Rasti-Barzoki, Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: a game-theoretic approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 105 (2017) 287–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Mahmoudi, K. Govindan, D. Shishebori and R. Mahmoudi, Product pricing problem in green and non-green multi-channel supply chains under government intervention and in the presence of third-party logistics companies. Comput. Ind. Eng. 159 (2021) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Maiti and S.K. Roy, Analysing interval and multi-choice bi-level programming for Stackelberg game using intuitionistic fuzzy programming. Math. Oper. Res. 16 (2020) 354–375. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Maiti and S.K. Roy, Bi-level programming for Stackelberg game with intuitionistic fuzzy number: a ranking approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Chin. 9 (2021) 131–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.I. Malik, B. Sarkar, M.W. Iqbal, M. Ullah, I. Khan and M.B. Ramzan, Coordination supply chain management in flexible production system and service level constraint: a Nash bargaining model. Comput. Ind. Eng. 177 (2023) 109002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • N.M. Modak, N. Kazemi and L.E. Cárdenas-Barrón, Investigating structure of a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain using social work donation as a corporate social responsibility practice. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 207 (2018) 19–33. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Mondal, B.K. Giri and S.K. Roy, An integrated sustainable bio-fuel and bio-energy supply chain: a novel approach based on DEMATEL and fuzzy-random robust flexible programming with Me measure. Appl. Energy 343 (2023) 121225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Mridha, B. Sarkar, L.E. Cárdenas-Barrón, G.V. Ramana and L. Yang, Is the advertisement policy for dual-channel profitable for retailing and consumer service of a retail management system under emissions-controlled flexible production system? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 78 (2024) 103662. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D. Ni and K.W. Li, A game-theoretic analysis of social responsibility conduct in two-echelon supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 138 (2012) 303–313. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Pal and A. Sarkar, Optimal strategies of a dual-channel green supply chain with recycling under retailer promotional effort. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 415–431. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Panda, Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract. Transp. Res. Part E 67 (2014) 92–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Panda, N.M. Modak, M. Basu and S.K. Goyal, Channel coordination and profit distribution in a social responsible three-layer supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 168 (2015) 224–233. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Panda, N.M. Modak and L.E. Cárdenas-Barrón, Coordinating a socially responsible closed-loop supply chain with product recycling. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 188 (2017) 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Pun and G.D. Deyong, Competing with copycats when customers are strategic. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 19 (2017) 403–418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Romani, S. Grappi and R.P. Bagozzi, Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: the role of gratitude and altruistic values. J. Bus. Ethics 114 (2013) 193–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • J.P. Rotter, P.E. Airike and C. Mark-Herbert, Exploring political corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. J. Bus. Ethics 125 (2014) 581–599. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Roy and S.K. Maiti, Reduction methods of type-2 fuzzy variables and their applications to Stackelberg game. Appl. Intell. 50 (2020) 1398–1415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Saha, Z. Banaszak, G. Bocewicz and I.E. Nielsen, Pricing and quality competition for substitutable green products with a common retailer. Oper. Res. 22 (2022) 3713–3746. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Saxena, B. Sarkar, H.-M. Wee, S. Reong, S.R. Singh and Y.L. Hsiao, A reverse logistics model with eco-design under the Stackelberg–Nash equilibrium and centralized framework. J. Clean. Prod. 387 (2023) 135789. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W.F. Shang, L.L. Teng, J.-B. Yang, Optimization of competitive supply chains with retailers’ horizontal cooperation and consumers’ green preference. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (2021) 68426–68447. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • L. Song, Q. Xin, H.L. Chen, L. Liao and Z.Y. Chen, Optimal decision-making of retailer-led dual-channel green supply with fairness concerns under government subsidies. Mathematics 11 (2023) 284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Swami and J. Shah, Channel coordination in green supply chain management. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64 (2013) 336–351. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • R.T. Takeng, Uncertain production environment and communication structure. J. Math. Econ. 102 (2022) 102744. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Tayyab, M.S. Habib, M.S.S. Jajja and B. Sarkar, Economic assessment of a serial production system with random imperfection and shortages: a step towards sustainability. Comput. Ind. Eng. 171 (2022) 108398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A.V. Thakor, Fintech and banking: What do we know? J. Finan. Intermed. 41 (2020) 100833. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D.P. Wen, T.J. Xiao and M. Dastani, Pricing and collection rate decisions in a closed-loop supply chain considering consumers’ environmental responsibility. J. Clean. Prod. 262 (2020) 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhao, W.S. Tang, R.Q. Zhao and J. Wei, Pricing decisions for substitutable products with a common retailer in fuzzy environments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216 (2012) 409–419. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhe and L. Li, Oligopolistic markets with leadership, cooperative followers and a multivalued inverse demand function. Oper. Res. Lett. 50 (2022) 685–692. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • W. Zhou and H.Z. Liu, Complexity analysis of dynamic R&D competition between high-tech firms. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 118 (2023) 107029. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W.G. Zhu and Y.J. He, Green product design in supply chains under competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258 (2017) 165–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.