Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 59, Number 5, September-October 2025
Page(s) 3041 - 3067
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2025113
Published online 20 October 2025
  • S. An, L. Bo, D. Song and X. Chen, Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 292 (2021) 125–142. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Andreu, D. Neven and S. Piccolo, Price authority and information sharing with competing supply chains. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 88 (2023) 102926. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Avinadav and P. Levy, Value of information in a mobile app supply chain under hidden or known information superiority. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 248 (2022) 108467. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Bai, Y. Yale, M. Jin and X. Xu, Effects of carbon emission reduction on supply chain coordination with vendor-managed deteriorating product inventory. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 208 (2019) 83–99. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Berthiaume, Wayfair swings to loss, misses Street on revenue in tough Q3, retrieved from https://chainstoreage.com/wayfair-swings-loss-misses-street-revenue-tough-q3 (last accessed April 28, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • C.C. Blanco, A classification of carbon abatement opportunities of global firms. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 24 (2022) 2648–2665. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Bodendorf and J. Franke, Multi-perspective analysis of monetary effects of information sharing between supply chain partners. Ind. Market. Manag. 104 (2022) 400–415. [Google Scholar]
  • O. Boyabatli and L.B. Toktay, Stochastic capacity investment and flexible vs. dedicated technology choice in imperfect capital markets. Manag. Sci. 57 (2011) 2163–2179. [Google Scholar]
  • R.L. Bray and H. Mendelson, Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: an empirical investigation. Manag. Sci. 58 (2012) 860–875. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Cao and M. Yu, The bright side of carbon emission permits on supply chain financing and performance. Omega 88 (2019) 24–39. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Cao, L. Du and J. Ruan, Financing preferences and performance for an emission-dependent supply chain: supplier vs. bank. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 208 (2019) 383–399. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Chen, A model of trade credit in a capital-constrained distribution channel. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159 (2015) 347–357. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chen, R. Zhang and B. Liu, New product financing decision: crowdfunding, bank or supply chain? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 249 (2022) 108536. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Chernonog and T. Avinadav, Pricing and advertising in a supply chain of perishable products under asymmetric information. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 209 (2019) 249–264. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Dada and Q.H. Hu, Financing newsvendor inventory. Oper. Res. Lett. 36 (2008) 569–573. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • C.H. Dye and T.P. Hsieh, A sustainable dynamic optimization model of pricing and advertising in the presence of green innovation investment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 315 (2024) 654–667. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Fan, M. Wang and L. Zhao, Production-inventory and emission reduction investment decision under carbon cap-and-trade policy. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 52 (2018) 1043–1067. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Ghosh and J. Shah, Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 319–329. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Gibbard, A model of search with two stages of information acquisition and additive learning. Manag. Sci. 68 (2022) 1212–1217. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Guan and Y.J. Chen, The interplay between information acquisition and quality disclosure. Prod. Oper. Manag. 26 (2017) 389–408. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Guo, The benefits of downstream information acquisition. Market. Sci. 28 (2009) 457–471. [Google Scholar]
  • A.Y. Ha, Q. Tian and S. Tong, Information sharing in competing supply chains with production cost reduction. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 19 (2017) 246–262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • L. He, R. Liu, Z. Zhong, D. Wang and Y. Xia, Can green financial development promote renewable energy investment efficiency? A consideration of bank credit. Renew. Energ. 143 (2019) 974–984. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, Global energy review: carbon dioxide emissions in 2021 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • S.K. Jena, S.S. Padhi and T.C.E. Cheng, Optimal selection of supply chain financing programmes for a financially distressed manufacturer. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 306 (2023) 457–477. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Jiang, L. Tian, Y. Xu and F. Zhang, To share or not to share: demand forecast sharing in a distribution channel. Market. Sci. 35 (2016) 800–809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • B. Jing and A. Seidmann, Finance sourcing in a supply chain. Decis. Support Syst. 58 (2014) 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Kang and B. Tan, Carbon emission reduction investment in sustainable supply chains under cap-and-trade regulation: an evolutionary game-theoretical perspective. Expert. Syst. Appl. 227 (2023) 120335. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Kouvelis and W. Zhao, Supply chain contract design under financial constraints and bankruptcy costs. Manag. Sci. 62 (2016) 2341–2357. [Google Scholar]
  • V. Kovtun, A. Giloni and C. Hurvich, The value of sharing disaggregated information in supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 277 (2019) 469–478. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Li and H. Zhang, Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer. Omega 50 (2015) 115–125. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Liu, Z. Zhang and Z. Wang, Two-sided matching and game on investing in carbon emission reduction technology under a cap-and-trade system. J. Clean. Prod. 282 (2021) 421–436. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Lu, C. Liao, M. Chen, V. Shi, X. Hu and W. Hu, Platform financing or bank financing in agricultural supply chains: The impact of platform digital empowerment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 315 (2024) 952–964. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Lusiantoro, N. Yates, C. Mena and L. Varga, A refined framework of information sharing in perishable product supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log. 48 (2018) 254–283. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Mardyana and G.C. Mahata, Impacts of dual carbon emission reduction technology and technology spillovers of deterioration reduction on supply chain system’s performances considering government incentives and contract design. J. Clean. Prod. 468 (2024) 142977. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Nouira, R. Hammami, Y. Frein and C. Temponi, Design of forward supply chains: impact of a carbon emissions-sensitive demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 173 (2016) 80–98. [Google Scholar]
  • F.E. Ouardighi, J.E. Sim and B. Kim, Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248 (2016) 982–996. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Parsaeifar, A. Bozorgi-Amiri, A. Naimi-Sadigh and M.S. Sangari, A game theoretical for coordination of pricing, recycling, and green product decisions in the supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 226 (2019) 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Peng, W. Wang, S. Li and E. Veglianti, Competition and cooperation in the dual-channel green supply chain with customer satisfaction. Econ. Anal. Policy 76 (2022) 95–113. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Raz, C.T. Druehl and V. Blass, Design for the environment: life-cycle approach using a newsvendor model. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22 (2013) 940–57. [Google Scholar]
  • J.M. Ries, C.H. Glock and K. Schwindl, The influence of financial conditions on optimal ordering and payment policies under progressive interest schemes. Omega 70 (2017) 15–30. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Sahin and B. Topal, Examination of effect of information sharing on business performance in the supply chain process. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 815–828. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Sarkar and R. Guchhait, Ramification of information asymmetry on a green supply chain management with the cap-trade, service, and vendor-managed inventory strategies. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 60 (2023) 101274. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Shamir and H. Shin, Public forecast information sharing in a market with competing supply chains. Manag. Sci. 62 (2016) 2994–3022. [Google Scholar]
  • S.Y. Wang and S.H. Choi, Decision analysis with green awareness and demand uncertainties under the option-available ETS system. Comput. Ind. Eng. 140 (2020) 106254. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Wang and X. Sun, Dynamic vs. static wholesale pricing strategies in a dual-channel green supply chain. Complexity 11 (2019) 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Wu, S. Amin and A.E. Ozdaglar, Value of information in Bayesian routing games. Oper. Res. 69 (2020) 148–163. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Yan, B.W. Sun, Z.H. Hang and C. Liu, A partial credit guarantee contract in supply chain: financing equilibrium and coordinating strategy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 173 (2016) 122–133. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Yang, W. Zhuo, L. Shao and S. Tallur, Mean-variance analysis of wholesale price contracts with a capital-constrained retailer: trade credit financing vs. bank credit financing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 294 (2021) 525–542. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Yang, X. Chen, L. Li and Y. Sun, Supply chain decision-making of green products considering a retailer’s fairness concerns under a pre-sale model. J. Clean. Prod. 414 (2023) 137457. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Yu, C. Luo, J. Xu and C.T. Ng, To share or not to share: strategic information sharing with store brand encroachment in platform markets. Transp. Res. Pt. e-Logist. Transp. Rev. 189 (2024) 103632. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Zhang and B.R. Nault, Information sharing in an MTO supply chain with upstream adjustments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 308 (2023) 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Zhang, D. Zhao, Z. Qiao, Y. Xiong and J. Jiang, Information sharing for competing manufacturers: the strategic analysis of environmental innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 404 (2023) 136884. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhao, H. Zhou and R. Leus, Recovery from demand disruption: Two-stage financing strategy for a capital-constrained supply chain under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 303 (2022) 699–718. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.