EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 2 (March-April 2026) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 60 2 (2026) 729-760 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 60, Number 2, March-April 2026
Page(s) 729 - 760
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2026011
Published online 10 April 2026
  • L. Abdullah, N. Zulkifli, H. Liao, E. Herrera-Viedma and A. Al-Barakati, An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy DEMATEL method combined with Choquet integral for sustainable solid waste management. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 82 (2019) 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  • O. Ahmadi, S.B. Mortazavi, H.A. Mahabadi and M. Hosseinpouri, Development of a dynamic quantitative risk assessment methodology using fuzzy DEMATEL-BN and leading indicators. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 142 (2020) 15–44. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Ahmadi-Javid, S.H. Fateminia and H.G. Gemünden, A method for risk response planning in project portfolio management. Proj. Manag. J. 51 (2022) 77–95. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Bai and Q. Du, Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 52 (2018) 645–659. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Bai, K. Zhang, H. Shi, M. An and X. Han, Project portfolio resource risk assessment considering project interdependency by the fuzzy Bayesian network. Complexity 2020 (2020) 5410978. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Bai, S. Kang, K. Zhang, B. Zhang and T. Pan, Modeling for external stakeholder risk assessment of project portfolios. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 31 (2024) 737–766. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Ben-David and T. Raz, An integrated approach for risk response development in project planning. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52 (2001) 14–25. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Cheng, L. Liu, X. Cheng and L. Tao, Risk analysis of public-private partnership waste- to-energy incineration projects in China: a hybrid fuzzy DEMATEL-ISM approach. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 31 (2023) 4255–4280. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Chu and Z. Wang, Research on project risk response strategy selection based on grey K-shell algorithm. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 10 (2020) 425–438. [Google Scholar]
  • J. de Andrés-Sánchez, A systematic review of the interactions of fuzzy set theory and option pricing. Expert Sys. Appl. 119 (2023) 119868. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Fan, N.-P. Lin and C. Sheu, Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: an analytical model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 112 (2008) 700–713. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Fazli, R. Kiani Mavi and M. Vosooghidizaji, Crude oil supply chain risk management with DEMATEL-ANP. Oper. Res. 15 (2015) 453–480. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Garg, A new exponential-logarithm-based single-valued neutrosophic set and their applications. Expert Sys. Appl. 238 (2024) 121854. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Geng, X. Wang, X. Li, K. Yu and P. Liu, Some interval neutrosophic linguistic Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making. Symmetry 10 (2018) 127. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Gohain, R. Chutia and P. Dutta, A distance measure for optimistic viewpoint of the information in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 119 (2023) 105747. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Guan, T. Servranckx and M. Vanhoucke, An analytical model for budget allocation in risk prevention and risk protection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 161 (2021) 107657. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Guo, Z. Yang, J. Sun and Y. Zhang, Impact pathways of emerging ITs to mitigate supply chain vulnerability: a novel DEMATEL-ISM approach based on grounded theory. Expert Sys. Appl. 239 (2024) 122398. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Haktanır and C. Kahraman, Intuitionistic fuzzy risk adjusted discount rate and certainty equivalent methods for risky projects. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 257 (2023) 108757. [Google Scholar]
  • S.M. Hatefi and J. Tamõsaitiene, An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model for evaluating construction projects by considering interrelationships among risk factors. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 25 (2019) 114–131. [Google Scholar]
  • L. He, Z. Wu, W. Xiang, M. Goh, Z. Xu, W. Song, X. Ming and X. Wu, A novel Kano- QFD-DEMATEL approach to optimise the risk resilience solution for sustainable supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59 (2021) 1714–1735. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Jiang, W. Wei, W. Shao, Y. Liang and Y. Qu, Research on large-scale bi-level particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Access 9 (2021) 56364–56375. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Kloock and B. Alrifaee, Coordinated cooperative distributed decision-making using synchronization of local plans. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 8 (2023) 1292–1306. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Li and K. Xu, A combined fuzzy DEMATEL and cloud model approach for risk assessment in process industries to improve system reliability. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 37 (2021) 2110–2133. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Li, Z. Han, R. Zhang, Y. Zhang and L. Zhang, Risk assessment of hydrogen generation unit considering dependencies using integrated DEMATEL and TOPSIS approach. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45 (2020) 29630–29642. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Liu, J. You and C. Duan, An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 207 (2019) 163–172. [Google Scholar]
  • W. Mao, W. Wang, D. Luo and H. Sun, Analyzing interactions between risk factors for ice disaster in Ning-Meng reach of Yellow River based on grey rough DEMATEL method. Nat. Hazards 97 (2019) 1025–1049. [Google Scholar]
  • A.C. Marques, E.A. Frej and A.T. de Almeida, Multicriteria decision support for project portfolio selection with the FITradeoff method. Omega 111 (2022) 102661. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Mican, G. Fernandes and M. Araújo, A method for project portfolio risk assessment considering risk interdependencies a network perspective. Procedia Comput. Sci. 196 (2022) 948–955. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Mokhtari and F. Aghagoli, Project portfolio risk response selection using Bayesian belief networks. Iran. J. Manag. Stud. 13 (2020) 197–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Rong, L. Yu, Y. Liu, V. Simic and H. Garg, The FMEA model based on LOPCOW-ARAS methods with interval- valued Fermatean fuzzy information for risk assessment of R&D projects in industrial robot offline programming systems. Comput. Appl. Math. 43 (2024) 25. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Salehi, S.M.J. Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, S.M. Moattar Husseini and S.H. Ghodsypour, A bi-level multi-follower optimization model for R&D project portfolio: an application to a pharmaceutical holding company. Ann. Oper. Res. 323 (2023) 331–360. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Samvedi and V. Jain, A study on the interactions between supply chain risk management criteria using fuzzy DEMATEL method. Int. J. Oper. Res. 18 (2013) 255–271. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Seker, F. Recal and H. Basligil, A combined DEMATEL and grey system theory approach for analyzing occupational risks: a case study in Turkish shipbuilding industry. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 23 (2017) 1340–1372. [Google Scholar]
  • A.G. Talouki, A. Koochari and S.A. Edalatpanah, Image completion based on segmentation using neutrosophic sets. Expert Sys. Appl. 238 (2024) 121769. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Wang, Q. Cao and L. Zhou, Research on the influencing factors in coal mine production safety based on the combination of DEMATEL and ISM. Saf. Sci. 103 (2018) 51–61. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Wang, Y. Song, R. Ding and M. Goh, Delay-oriented risk network model for project risk response decisions. Comput. Ind. Eng. 171 (2022) 108370. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Wu, J. Li, T. Xia, C. Bao, Y. Zhao and Q. Dai, A multiobjective optimization method considering process risk correlation for project risk response planning. Inf. Sci. 467 (2018) 282–295. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Wu, X. Zhu, J. Wan, C. Bao and J. Li, A multiobjective optimization approach for selecting risk response strategies of software project: from the perspective of risk correlations. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making 18 (2019) 339–364. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Xiao, L.J. Osterweil, J. Chen, Q. Wang and M. Li, Search based risk mitigation planning in project portfolio management, in Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process (2013) 146–155. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Ye, Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. J. Int. Fuzzy Syst. 26 (2014) 165–172. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Ye, Some aggregation operators of interval neutrosophic linguistic numbers for multiple attribute decision making. J. Int. Fuzzy Syst. 27 (2014) 2231–2241. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhang, Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34 (2016) 819–830. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhang and Z. Fan, An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32 (2014) 412–422. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhang and X. Guan, Selecting project risk preventive and protective strategies based on bow-tie analysis. J. Manag. Eng. 34 (2018) 04018009. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhang and X. Guan, Budget allocation decisions for project risk response. Kybernetes 50 (2021) 3201–3221. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhang and F. Zuo, Selection of risk response actions considering risk dependency. Kybernetes 45 (2016) 1652–1667. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Zhang, L. Bai, K. Zhang, S. Kang and X. Zhou, Dynamic assessment of project portfolio risks from the life cycle perspective. Comput. Ind. Eng. 176 (2023) 108922. [Google Scholar]
  • X. Zhang, M. Goh, S. Bai, Z. Wang and Q. Wang, Project risk response decision making under uncertain project interdependencies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 71 (2023) 7364–7378. [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Zhang, J. Liu, X. Xie, C. Wang and L. Bai, Modeling of project portfolio risk evolution and response under the influence of interactions. Mathematics 11 (2023) 4091. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Zheng, X. Liu, W. Wang and S. Han, A hybrid HFACS model using DEMATEL-ORESTE method with linguistic Z-number for risk analysis of human error factors in the healthcare system. Expert Syst. Appl. 235 (2024) 121237. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Zuo and K. Zhang, Selection of risk response actions with consideration of secondary risks. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 36 (2018) 241–254. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Zuo, E. Zio and Y. Yuan, Risk-Response strategy optimization considering limited risk- related resource allocation and scheduling. J Constr. Eng. Manag. 148 (2022) 04022123. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Zuo, E. Zio and Y. Xu, Bi-objective optimization of the scheduling of risk-related resources for risk response. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 237 (2023) 109391. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.