EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 3 (May-June 2026) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 60 3 (2026) 1525-1572 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 60, Number 3, May-June 2026
Page(s) 1525 - 1572
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2026041
Published online 19 June 2026
  • F. Ahemad, A.Z. Khan, M.K. Mehlawat, P. Gupta and S.K. Roy, Multi-attribute group decision making for solid waste management using interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy COPRAS. RAIRO Oper. Res. 57 (2023) 1239–1265. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Alghazzawi, H. Alolaiyan, L. Latif, U. Shuaib, H.A.E.-W. Khalifa, H. Alqahtani and Q. Xin, A cutting-edge TOPSIS approach for navigating MCDM challenges under t-intuitionistic fuzzy environments. IEEE Access 12 (2024) 44873–44887. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Alkan and C. Kahraman, Circular intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method: pandemic hospital location selection. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 42 (2021) 295–316. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg (1999) 1–137. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Atanassov, Circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 39 (2020) 5981–5986. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Atanassov and E. Marinov, Four distances for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Mathematics 9 (2021) 1121. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Asif, T. Abdullah, F. Amin, S. Siddique and R. Ali, Hamacher aggregation operators for Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their application in multi-attribute decision making problem. Spec. Oper. Res. 2 (2021) 27–40. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Ayyildiz, Fermatean fuzzy step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development goal-7. Renew. Energy 193 (2022) 136–148. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Bajaj and S. Kumar, Pythagorean fuzzy similarity measure with significance in MCDM and transportation challenges. Evol. Intell. 18 (2025) 93. [Google Scholar]
  • G. Beliakov, A. Pradera and T. Calvo, Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners, Vol. 221. Springer, Berlin (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • A. Biswas, K.H. Gazi, P.S. Mondal and A. Ghosh, A decision making framework for sustainable highway restaurant site selection: AHP-TOPSIS approach based on the fuzzy numbers. Spec. Oper. Res. 2 (2025) 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Canco, D. Kruja and T. Iancu, AHP, a reliable method for quality decision making: a case study in business. Sustainability 13 (2021) 13932. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Çakır and M.A. Taş, Circular intuitionistic fuzzy decision making and its application. Expert Syst. Appl. 225 (2023) 120076. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Çaloğlu Büyükselçuk and Y.C. Sarı, The best whey protein powder selection via VIKOR based on circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Symmetry 15 (2023) 1313. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Chakraborty, R.D. Raut, T.M. Rofin and S. Chakraborty, On solving a healthcare supplier selection problem using MCDM methods in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Opsearch 61 (2024) 680–708. [Google Scholar]
  • H.A. Dağıstanlı, An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR approach for R&D project selection in defense industry investment decisions. J. Soft. Comput. Decis. Anal. 2 (2024) 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Debnath, S.K. Roy, M. Deveci and H. Tomášková, Integrated MADM approach based on extended MABAC method with Aczel–Alsina generalized weighted Bonferroni mean operator. Artif. Intell. Rev. 58 (2024) 27. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Debnath, E.B. Tirkolaee and S.K. Roy, A decision making model with new Dice–Jaccard similarity measure: green hydrogen electrolyzer selection. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 160 (2025) 111817. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Deveci, E.A. Varouchakis, P.R. Brito-Parada, A.R. Mishra, P. Rani, M. Bolgkoranou and M. Galetakis, Evaluation of risks impeding sustainable mining using Fermatean fuzzy score function based SWARA method. Appl. Soft Comput. 139 (2023) 110220. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Diakoulaki, G. Mavrotas and L. Papayannakis, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method. Comput. Oper. Res. 22 (1995) 763–770. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Dombi, A general class of fuzzy operators, the DeMorgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 8 (1982) 149–163. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Fahmi, A. Khan, Z. Maqbool and T. Abdeljawad, Circular intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators for multi-attribute decision making. Sci. Rep. 15 (2025) 5618. [Google Scholar]
  • H. Garg, M. Ünver, M. Olgun and E. Türkaslan, An extended EDAS method with circular intuitionistic fuzzy value features and its application to multi-criteria decision making process. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56 (2023) 3173–3204. [Google Scholar]
  • C.P. Garg, Ö.F. Görçün, P. Kundu and H. Küçükönder, An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach based on Bonferroni functions for selection and evaluation of industrial robots for the automobile manufacturing industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 213 (2023) 118863. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Giri, S.K. Roy and M. Deveci, An MADM model using Frank operations based power aggregation operator under quasi-rung orthopair fuzzy sets for highway selection in war-plane landing. Appl. Soft Comput. 185 (2025) 113918. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Guo, R. Imran, S. Yin, K. Ullah, M. Akram, D. Pamucar and M. Elashiry, Assessment of air purifiers for improving the air quality index using circular intuitionistic fuzzy Heronian means. Complex Intell. Syst. 11 (2025) 258. [Google Scholar]
  • F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma and F. Chiclana, A study of the origin and uses of the ordered weighted geometric operator in multicriteria decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18 (2003) 689–707. [Google Scholar]
  • J.-Y. Huang, Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27 (2014) 505–513. [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hussain, T. Abdullah, F. Amin, S. Siddique and R. Ali, Advanced decision making with complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy Muirhead mean models. Spec. Decis. Mak. Appl. 3 (2021) 316–338. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Ijaz, T. Abdullah, F. Amin, S. Siddique and R. Ali, Dynamic aggregation operators for selection of optimal communication system in the rescue department under complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Spec. Decis. Mak. Appl. 3 (2021) 339–363. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Joshi and S. Kumar, Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making. Egypt. Inform. J. 15 (2014) 97–104. [Google Scholar]
  • C. Kahraman and I. Otay, Extension of VIKOR method using circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets, in International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (2021) 48–57. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Kawecka, A. Perec and A. Radomska-Zalas, Use of the simple multicriteria decision making (MCDM) method for optimization of the high-alloy steel cutting process by the abrasive water jet. Spec. Mech. Eng. Oper. Res. 1 (2024) 111–120. [Google Scholar]
  • V. Keršuliene, E.K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 11 (2010) 243–258. [Google Scholar]
  • M.J. Khan, W. Kumam and N.A. Alreshidi, Divergence measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 116 (2022) 105455. [Google Scholar]
  • M.R. Khan, K. Ullah, Z. Ali, E. Rak, D. Pamucar and Y. Shang, The MCDM approach using preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation for intuitionistic fuzzy sets with AHP based weight information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2025) 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Klement, R. Mesiar and E. Pap, Triangular norms. Position paper II: general constructions and parameterized families. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 145 (2004) 411–438. [Google Scholar]
  • D. Li, W. Zeng and J. Li, Geometric bonferroni mean operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31 (2016) 1181–1197. [Google Scholar]
  • Item R. Liang, S. He, J. Wang, K. Chen and L. Li, An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision making problems based on correlative inputs of intuitionistic fuzzy information. Comput. Appl. Math. 38 (2019) 112. [Google Scholar]
  • P. Liu and S.-M. Chen, Group decision making based on Heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 47 (2016) 2514–2530. [Google Scholar]
  • I. Otay and C. Kahraman, A novel circular intuitionistic fuzzy AHP&VIKOR methodology: an application to a multi-expert supplier evaluation problem. Pamukkale Univ. Muh. Bilim. Derg. 28 (2022) 194–207. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Opricovic and G.-H. Tzeng, Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178 (2007) 514–529. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Petchimuthu and A.K. Singh, Sustainable urban development: q-Rung orthopair fuzzy MCDM with generalized power prioritized Yager aggregation. Spectr. Oper. Res. 3 (2021) 275–309. [Google Scholar]
  • E. Rak, J. Sarzyński and R. Rak, Effectiveness of an ensemble technique based on the distributivity equation in detecting suspicious network activity. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 488 (2024) 109015. [Google Scholar]
  • S. Rani and S. Dhanasekar, Type-2 trapezoidal Pythagorean fuzzy number with novel entropy measure and aggregation operators extended to MCDM. Complex Intell. Syst. 11 (2025) 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Rukhsar, K. Ullah, Z. Ali and A. Hussain, Analysis of power aggregation operators through circular intuitionistic fuzzy information and their applications in machine learning analysis. Eng. Rev. 44 (2024) 141–159. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Sahoo, B.K. Debnath and A. Saha, An integrated Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for best supplier selection in sustainable agile manufacturing. RAIRO Oper. Res. 59 (2025) 2577–2606. [Google Scholar]
  • B. Schweizer and A. Sklar, Statistical metric spaces. Pac. J. Math. 10 (1960) 313–334. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Senapati, G. Chen, R. Mesiar and R.R. Yager, Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators in the framework of Aczel–Alsina triangular norms and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 212 (2023) 118832. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Tavana, M. Soltanifar and F.J. Santos-Arteaga, Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution. Ann. Oper. Res. 326 (2023) 879–907. [Google Scholar]
  • Y.-J. Wang and H.-S. Lee, Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision making. Comput. Math. Appl. 53 (2007) 1762–1772. [Google Scholar]
  • T.-C. Wang and Y.-H. Chen, Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP. Inf. Sci. 178 (2008) 3755–3765. [Google Scholar]
  • W.W. Wang and X.W. Liu, Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 26 (2011) 1049–1075. [Google Scholar]
  • W.-D. Wang, J. Guo, L.-G. Fang and X.-S. Chang, A subjective and objective integrated weighting method for landslides susceptibility mapping based on GIS. Environ. Earth Sci. 65 (2012) 1705–1714. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Xu and Q.-L. Da, An overview of operators for aggregating information. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18 (2003) 953–969. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Xu and R.R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 35 (2006) 417–433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 18 (2002) 183–190. [Google Scholar]
  • R.R. Yager, Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, in Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS). IEEE (2013) 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  • R.R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 25 (2016) 1222–1230. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Yazdani, A.E. Torkayesh, E.D.R. Santibanez-Gonzalez and S.K. Otaghsara, Evaluation of renewable energy resources using integrated Shannon entropy–EDAS model. Sustain. Oper. Comput. 1 (2020) 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  • L. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8 (1965) 338–353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Zhao, Z. Xu, M. Ni and S. Liu, Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25 (2010) 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Zhang, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Frank aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making. Neural Comput. Appl. 28 (2017) 1471–1501. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.