EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 / No 4 (July-August 2022) RAIRO-Oper. Res., 56 4 (2022) 2513-2534 References
Open Access
Issue
RAIRO-Oper. Res.
Volume 56, Number 4, July-August 2022
Page(s) 2513 - 2534
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022117
Published online 09 August 2022
  • A. Arabmaldar, E.K. Mensah and M. Toloo, Robust worst-practice interval DEA with non-discretionary factors. Expert Syst. Appl. 182 (2021) 115256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Y. Bian, S. Yan and H. Xu, Efficiency evaluation for regional urban water use and wastewater decontamination systems in China: A DEA approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 83 (2014) 15–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Programming with linear fractional functions. Nav. Res. Logist. Quart. 9 (1962) 181–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford and J. Stutz, Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J. Econom. 30 (1985) 91–107. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Chen and J. Zhu, Additive slacks-based measure: Computational strategy and extension to network DEA. Omega 91 (2020) 102022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford and J. Zhu, Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 71 (2004) 151–172. [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Cui and Y. Li, CNG2020 strategy and airline efficiency: a network epsilon-based measure with managerial disposability. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 12 (2018) 313–323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Cui and Y. Li, Airline environmental efficiency measures considering materials balance principles: an application of a network range-adjusted measure with weak-G disposability. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 61 (2018) 2298–2318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Cui and Z. Jin, Airline environmental efficiency measures considering negative data: An application of a modified network modified slacks-based measure model. Energy 207 (2020) 118–221. [Google Scholar]
  • R. Färe and S. Grosskopf, Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: comment. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85 (2003) 1070–1074. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • H. Fukuyama and W.L. Weber, A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega 38 (2010) 398–409. [Google Scholar]
  • J. Gerami, M.R. Mozaffari, P.F. Wanke and H.L. Correa, Improving information reliability of non-radial value efficiency analysis: An additive slacks based measure approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 298 (2022) 967–978. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Grant, S. Boyd and Y. Ye, Cvx: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.0 beta (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • R.H. Green, W. Cook and J. Doyle, A note on the additive data envelopment analysis model. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 48 (1997) 446–448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • A. Hailu and T.S. Veeman, Non-parametric pr oductivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 83 (2001) 605–616. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Hu, Sh Yan, X. Li, L. Yao and Zh Luo, Evaluating the oil production and wastewater treatment efficiency by an extended two-stage network structure model with feedback variables. J. Environ. Manage. 251 (2019) 109578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Kao, Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 255 (2016) 778–786. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • C. Kao, A classification of slacks-based efficiency measures in network data envelopment analysis with an analysis of the properties possessed. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270 (2018) 1109–1121. [Google Scholar]
  • T. Kuosmanen, Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87 (2005) 1077–1082. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • T. Kuosmanen and V. Podinovski, Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 91 (2009) 539–545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Lozano, Slacks-based inefficiency approach for general networks with bad outputs: An application to the banking sector. Omega 60 (2016) 73–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • S. Lozano, E. Gutiérrez and P. Moreno, Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Appl. Math. Model. 37 (2013) 1665–1676. [Google Scholar]
  • M. Salahi, M. Toloo and N. Torabi, A new robust optimization approach to common weights formulation in DEA. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72 (2021) 1390–1402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Shakouri and M. Salahi, Performance measurement and resource sharing among business sub-units in the presence of non-discretionary factors. J. Model. Manag. 17 (2022) 100–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R.W. Shephard, Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press (1970). [Google Scholar]
  • R. Shi, A. Emrouznejad and W. Yu, Overall efficiency of operational process with undesirable outputs containing both series and parallel processes: A SBM network DEA model. Expert Syst. Appl. 178 (2021) 115062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Song, S. Wang and W. Liu, A two-stage DEA approach for environmental efficiency measurement. Environ. Monit. Assess. 186 (2014) 3041–3051. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • M. Toloo, E.K. Mensah and M. Salahi, Robust optimization and its duality in data envelopment analysis. Omega 108 (2022) 102583. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • K. Tone, A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130 (2001) 498–509. [Google Scholar]
  • K. Tone and M. Tsutsui, Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197 (2009) 243–252. [Google Scholar]
  • T.W. Yang, J.H. Na and H.K. Ha, Comparative analysis of production possibility frontier in measuring social efficiency with data envelopment analysis: An Application to Airports. Sustainability 11 (2019) 2181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • F. Yang, D. Wang, L. Zhao and F. Wei, Efficiency evaluation for regional industrial water use and wastewater treatment systems in China: A dynamic interactive network slacks-based measure model. J. Environ. Manage. 279 (2021) 111–721. [Google Scholar]
  • N. Zarbakhshnia and T.J. Jaghdani, Sustainable supplier evaluation and selection with a novel two-stage DEA model in the presence of uncontrollable inputs and undesirable outputs: A plastic case study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 97 (2018) 2933–2945. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • X. Zhou, R. Luo, L. Yao, S. Cao, S. Wang and B. Lev, Assessing integrated water use and wastewater treatment systems in China: A mixed network structure two-stage SBM DEA model. J. Clean. Prod. 185 (2018) 533–546. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Z. Zhu, K. Wang and B. Zhang, Applying a network data envelopment analysis model to quantify the eco-efficiency of products: a case study of pesticides. J. Clean. Prod. 69 (2014) 67–73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Q. Zhu, F. Li, J. Wu and J. Sun, Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on the perspective of fairness utility. Comput. Ind. Eng. 151 (2021) 106926. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.